> well because X docs are third party, and we don't usually make local
> changes to third party docs. having said that, there are exceptions,
> and i know we have changed some docs (forget which) to mention
> xenodm. so that's why i said i'd leave it to the X folks ;)
oh. duh. maintenance burden
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:23:14AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>
> > On Apr 23, 2017, at 2:44 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > [...] but note that all this text is doing is giving an example of a
> > window manager and, as such, it's not wrong.
>
> My thinking is that preventing stuff like
>
> On Apr 23, 2017, at 2:44 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> [...] but note that all this text is doing is giving an example of a
> window manager and, as such, it's not wrong.
My thinking is that preventing stuff like
$ man xdm
man: No entry for xdm in the manual.
where possible
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 05:49:59PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Index: xinit.man
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/xinit/man/xinit.man,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -r1.3 xinit.man
> --- xinit.man 30 Aug 2015 13:32:02 -
Index: xinit.man
===
RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/xinit/man/xinit.man,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 xinit.man
--- xinit.man 30 Aug 2015 13:32:02 - 1.3
+++ xinit.man 21 Apr 2017 21:51:16 -
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@