In article <20190927125444.gb12...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>,
Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
>May be we should take a look at how SNMP did tables in MIB, b/c we are
>trying to create just such a table indexed by module name.
I think it is simpler than that.
>
>Also, I'm not that sure about autoload of compa
On Fri 27 Sep 2019 at 21:12:13 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Thank you for the analysis. Please prepare a patch and commit. Please
> add in the message:
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+68c37d09c833f8ec1...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
How about this patch. I managed to avoid getting into 64-bit
calculati
On 27.09.2019 20:50, Rhialto wrote:
> On Fri 27 Sep 2019 at 15:53:47 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 27.09.2019 10:19, Rhialto wrote:
>>> On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 01:15:23 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
Is this patch correct?
http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00168-kern_rndq.c-avoid-o
On Fri 27 Sep 2019 at 15:53:47 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 27.09.2019 10:19, Rhialto wrote:
> > On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 01:15:23 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> Is this patch correct?
> >>
> >> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00168-kern_rndq.c-avoid-overflow.txt
> >>
> >> This code will ma
> I guess the main fear is that the attacker can put a malicious (and likely
> explicitly crafted for a certain bug in NetBSD's linux compat) binary on
> your machine and exectue it.
Yes, I guess that's the (valid) point.
My impression (I stay corrected) is that compat_linux is mostly used to run
> and I'm making a proposal to disable this feature, to prevent this trouble
> in the future. Nothing controversial about that, it just makes sense.
>
> You are not worth my time.
Would you mind taking a deep breath and realize that I'm NOT OBJECTING
to your proposal?
I was just trying to say t
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:41:53AM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> > Do you want to contribute and do all the actual dirty work for once,
> > or you're just here to talk and give your random opinions on things
> > you've never invested yourself in? What is your background? What is
> > your portfolio?
>
>
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Valery Ushakov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:36:08 -, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} I propose something very slightly different that can preserve the current
} functionality with user action:
}
} 1. Remove them from standard kernels in architectures where modules are
}
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:36:08 -, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >} I propose something very slightly different that can preserve the current
> >} functionality with user action:
> >}
> >} 1. Remove them from standard kernels in architectures where modules are
> >}supported. Users can add the
On 27.09.2019 10:19, Rhialto wrote:
> On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 01:15:23 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> Is this patch correct?
>>
>> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00168-kern_rndq.c-avoid-overflow.txt
>>
>> This code will map the corner case into defined semantics, treating
>> delta INT32_MIN as INT
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:57:12 +0200, Jarom?r Dole?ek wrote:
> Le jeu. 26 sept. 2019 ? 18:08, Manuel Bouyer a ?crit
> :
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:10:01PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > > issues for a clearly marginal use case, and given the current general
> > ^
In article <201909262031.x8qkvnpv021...@server.cornerstoneservice.ca>,
John Nemeth wrote:
>On Sep 26, 7:40pm, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>} In article <390f4c81-bf1c-443f-f7a9-a379c46b7...@m00nbsd.net>,
>} Maxime Villard wrote:
>} >I recently made a big set of changes to fix many bugs and vulnerab
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 08:30:40AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:40:22PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > If the vulnerabilities can only be exploited by running Linux binaries,
> > IMHO, the point is moot: the ones that don't run Linux binaries are not
> > affect
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
> [...]
> Given the history, to me it's completely clear compat_linux shouldn't
> be on by default. Any possible linux-specific exploits should only be
> problem for people actually explicitly enabling it. Let's just stop
> pretending
Le jeu. 26 sept. 2019 à 18:08, Manuel Bouyer a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:10:01PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > issues for a clearly marginal use case, and given the current general
> ^^^
>
> This is where we dissagree. You guess it's marginal bu
On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 01:15:23 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Is this patch correct?
>
> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00168-kern_rndq.c-avoid-overflow.txt
>
> This code will map the corner case into defined semantics, treating
> delta INT32_MIN as INT32_MIN+1.
I don't know if it is important
from Kamil Rytarowski:
> I have managed to get light cross-toolchain producing Linux binaries.
> The only dependency is musl (+gmake to build it).
Is it necessary to use musl, as opposed to uClibc-ng or glibc?
Did you cross-compile from NetBSD to get the cross-toolchain, or did you need
some L
17 matches
Mail list logo
