On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, David Young wrote:
2. kern/kern_sleepq.c:sleepq_insert()
The only place this is called aside from that file is compat_sa.c so its
probably a gross invasion of the API.
Probably a gross invasion.
considering what to do about this one, I thought to make it static
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:27:41PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
however, I'm not that enamoured of the name, and considering the following
(mostly MI) instances that I have found:
1. dev/ic/ad1848.c:ad_read()
ad_write()
ad_xread()
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:27:41PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
returning to GNUC vs C99 semantics for inline functions, this is now
partly handled with a __c99inline keyword but there are several files in
the kernel containing functions marked
Hi
returning to GNUC vs C99 semantics for inline functions, this is now
partly handled with a __c99inline keyword but there are several files in
the kernel containing functions marked inline that yet require external
linkage as they are also called from other source modules.. this is
provided by
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:27:41PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
returning to GNUC vs C99 semantics for inline functions, this is now
partly handled with a __c99inline keyword but there are several files in
the kernel containing functions marked inline that yet require external
linkage as they
