On 17.12.2019 09:16, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> Module Name: htdocs
>> Committed By: christos
>> Date: Tue Dec 17 01:03:49 UTC 2019
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> htdocs/support/security: advisory.html index.html
>>
>> Log Message:
>> new advisory
>>
>>
>> To generate a diff of this
On 17.12.2019 14:19, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 17/12/2019 à 12:34, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
>> On 17.12.2019 09:16, Maxime Villard wrote:
Module Name: htdocs
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Dec 17 01:03:49 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
Le 17/12/2019 à 14:32, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
On 17.12.2019 14:19, Maxime Villard wrote:
Le 17/12/2019 à 12:34, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
On 17.12.2019 09:16, Maxime Villard wrote:
Module Name: htdocs
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Dec 17 01:03:49 UTC 2019
Modified
Module Name:htdocs
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Dec 17 01:03:49 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
htdocs/support/security: advisory.html index.html
Log Message:
new advisory
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.140 -r1.141
Please note that we do have a way of installing new syscalls (via the
syscall_{,dis}establish() mechanism), but that only works for syscalls
that are not currently in use. We don't have a (clean) way to replace
an already-installed syscall (no way to retrieve the current function
pointer).
On
Le 17/12/2019 à 12:34, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
On 17.12.2019 09:16, Maxime Villard wrote:
Module Name: htdocs
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Dec 17 01:03:49 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
htdocs/support/security: advisory.html index.html
Log Message:
new advisory
To
> > > Typically with a character device, the kmod can get unloaded while an
> > > ioctl
> > > is being executed on it.
That's solvable. Conceptually I think the main stumbling block is that
there are two layers at play which need to reconciled: specfs and devsw. It
could also be an opportunity
On 17.12.2019 15:44, Andrew Doran wrote:
Typically with a character device, the kmod can get unloaded while an ioctl
is being executed on it.
>
> That's solvable. Conceptually I think the main stumbling block is that
> there are two layers at play which need to reconciled: specfs and
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 04:06:12PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 17.12.2019 15:44, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Typically with a character device, the kmod can get unloaded while an
> ioctl
> is being executed on it.
> >
> > That's solvable. Conceptually I think the main stumbling
A bit off on a tangent, but my intent was to keep this stuff very simple and
distinct from the general (evcnt) type case because these are special to my
mind due to their well established use and how clustered they are.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 05:07:12AM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> It is
Le 17/12/2019 à 15:44, Andrew Doran a écrit :
Typically with a character device, the kmod can get unloaded while an ioctl
is being executed on it.
That's solvable. Conceptually I think the main stumbling block is that
there are two layers at play which need to reconciled: specfs and devsw.
11 matches
Mail list logo
