On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Martin S. Weber wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
- A port's MONOLITHIC kernel should include features that
traditionally would have been present in a non-modular GENERIC
kernel, and it may or may not include options MODULAR, at the
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:09:58AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Martin S. Weber wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
- A port's MONOLITHIC kernel should include features that
traditionally would have been present in a non-modular GENERIC
On 09/22/11 02:00, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
On 21.09.2011 17:47, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi,
when I boot latest -current dom0 kernel I get this panic:
Mutex error: lockdebug_barrier: spin lock held
lock address : 0xa00023604790 type : spin
initialized : 0x803276c0
shared holds :
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:53:53AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
What is the difference between MONOLITHIC and MODULAR with 'built-in'
modules? And wouldn't the latter be a better aim??
I think that by MODULAR with built-in modules, you mean a barebones
kernel linked with some .kmod's? I would
It would appear that wapbl is only relevant for ffs file systems (and in
particular, only for ffs filesystems with a V2 superblock format).
Yet the current modularization of wapbl is not dependant on the ffs
module. (wapbl's required-list is empty.)
I realize that even though wapbl
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:24:48AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
I realize that even though wapbl registers itself as a module, it is
not built as a loadable module - ie, it must be built-in. I
intend to try to change this, so I would like to know if wapbl is
ever intended for non-ffs file
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:24:48AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
I realize that even though wapbl registers itself as a module, it is
not built as a loadable module - ie, it must be built-in. I
intend to try to change this, so I would like to know
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:08:02AM -0500, David Young wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:53:53AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
What is the difference between MONOLITHIC and MODULAR with 'built-in'
modules? And wouldn't the latter be a better aim??
I think that by MODULAR with built-in modules,
