On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:37:06AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Matthias Kretschmer wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:42:27PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
How about using fss for it instead.
1. fss is still marked experimental.
oh, I have overlooked that.
2. does fss work
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Kretschmer wrote:
How about using fss for it instead.
1. fss is still marked experimental.
oh, I have overlooked that.
I'm not sure that should stop you though. Or the marking should be
removed. People use it, it seems to work, it's been
How about using fss for it instead.
Well, the point is not that I primarily don't want the atimes to reflect
the backup access. I primarily want to save the time spent on the update.
A find is aproximately twice as fast with noatime.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
How about using fss for it instead.
1. fss is still marked experimental.
oh, I have overlooked that.
2. does fss work with WAPL at all?
I don't know that.
It seems to work for me! All my FS are WAPBL-enabled, and I always
use backup -X for
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:45:53PM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
Although it's useful to mount random media more safely than it would be
using kernel-space, I noticed that using 64KB reads, the kernel cd9660
will gladly read ~20MB/s from a DVD, but that rump_cd9660 using
64KB reads is limited
