this moves knowledge of where the inbound doorbell on chips is out
of code and into the structure that stores the chip differences.
ive tested this on a perc5 (which is the xscale gen). id like a
skinny user to give it a spin too.
Index: mfi.c
On 10 August 2012 09:09, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
this moves knowledge of where the inbound doorbell on chips is out
of code and into the structure that stores the chip differences.
ive tested this on a perc5 (which is the xscale gen). id like a
skinny user to give it a spin too.
Add support to re(4) for the D-Link DGE-530T C1 adapter.
Index: sys/dev/pci/if_re_pci.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_re_pci.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -p -r1.34 if_re_pci.c
--- sys/dev/pci/if_re_pci.c 9
El E-mail no se muestran correctamente? Verlo en el navegador.
www.mega-publicidad.com
0810-333-4927
sábado, 07 de julio de 2012
Diseño de Páginas Web
Campañas Publicitarias...
La publicidad a través del posicionamiento de Sitios Web, se ha convertido
en uno de
Hi,
Hope you are doing well.
I was expecting your response on my email detailed below.
Let me know if you are interested and we can discuss this further.
Kind regards
Jak
Business development Manager
_
From: Email
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:40 PM
To: tech@openbsd.org
Subject:
On 09/08/12(Thu) 12:31, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 03:30:16PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Thanks to mpi@, libusb now has some support for communicating
with devices even though they're not attached to ugen(4).
What do people think about removing the UQ_BAD_HID
On 2012/08/10 13:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
I'm also in favor of removing quirks however I would suggest to remove
them on a case-by-case basis until libusb have full support for
communicating with any usb device (hopefully in this release cycle).
Many items on that list are UPS which share
On 10/08/12(Fri) 13:13, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/08/10 13:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
I'm also in favor of removing quirks however I would suggest to remove
them on a case-by-case basis until libusb have full support for
communicating with any usb device (hopefully in this release
Quoting Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
On 2012/08/10 13:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
I'm also in favor of removing quirks however I would suggest to remove
them on a case-by-case basis until libusb have full support for
communicating with any usb device (hopefully in this release
