> Any reason to not replace the somewhat arbitary earlier test
> for this?
I chose to keep the condition simpler and the existing constraints intact for
minimal impact, but I would agree it's better to consolidate with the existing
check.
Your diff looks good to me, +1.
Try sp...@openbsd.org Markus.
See: http://www.OpenBSD.Org/mail.html
> From: John Troy
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:56:24 -0400
>
> On 4/28/16 2:30 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > So here are just the bits that add DMA support. Since Theo likes this
> > so much, I'd like to move forward with this.
> >
> > ok?
> >
> Hi Mark,
> This diff seems to break
> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:34:59 +0100
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Try sp...@openbsd.org Markus.
Not a particularly useful suggestion for something that doesn't look
like an problem that is specific to sparc64.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:00:32PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Markus Lude wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > with latest snapshot I've short hangs on my (good old) SUN Blade 100.
> > The desktop clocks often shows jumps for several seconds.
> > I
The diff below adds support for changing the bus width to the sdmmc
subsystem and the sdhc(4) controller. By default controllers and card
use a 1-bit bus. But most SD cards actually have support fora 4-bit
bus. This can be checked by looking atthe SCR register. In theory
using the 4-bit bus
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 09:50:15PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below adds support for changing the bus width to the sdmmc
> subsystem and the sdhc(4) controller. By default controllers and card
> use a 1-bit bus. But most SD cards actually have support fora 4-bit
> bus. This can be
When matching by PID, we'd better return ESRCH expicitly rather
than zero entries. This makes, for example, fstat(1) behaviour
more consistent and makes it easier to replace "if lsof -p ..."
checks in third-party code with "if fstat -p ...".
For libkvm, I explicitly test for ESRCH to avoid going