On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 14:06:22 -0800, enh wrote:
> it seems like OpenBSD did cherrypick this FreeBSD regex fix...
>
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/981dd2aa38f37e4d0dd86225c619e900fc0
> 3d82e#diff-d7c26714f9432399b202eefcedb97491
>
> ...but not this one, which also seems to apply to the
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:00 PM Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> enh wrote:
> > it seems like OpenBSD did cherrypick this FreeBSD regex fix...
> >
> > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/981dd2aa38f37e4d0dd86225c619e900fc03d82e#diff-d7c26714f9432399b202eefcedb97491
>
> That's an odd way to phrase apply
The architecture already has big PIE. The issue is that clang doesn't
support secure-plt for small pic. I haven't entirely figured out
what's going on here and we probably need some further fixes to clang
here. On the other hand I think it is probably time to recognize
there is more and more blo
This is quite hilarious. The powerpc assembly code in LLVM's
libunwind can't be compiled by clang's integrated assembler. Now I do
agree that using ";" is a strange character to use to start comments
and I prefer writing %r3 instead of r3 myself as well. So this diff
converts the code. There ar
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:50:25PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
On 4 Feb 2019, at 22:00, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:07:22PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
Currently you can change a tun interface from being point to point to
being a broadcast interface. Why?
I'm using broadc
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:59 PM Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> The architecture already has big PIE. The issue is that clang doesn't
> support secure-plt for small pic. I haven't entirely figured out
> what's going on here and we probably need some further fixes to clang
> here. On the other hand I th
