Continuing to convert uvm_km_valloc() calls to km_alloc(), sparc64's
struct cpu_info wants to be allocated on an 8 page boundary, so it needs
a custom kmem_va_mode. My T5120 didn't blow up with this, so I think it
works.
ok?
Index: arch/sparc64/sparc64/cpu.c
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:01:58AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In revision 1.87 of ip_icmp.c claudio@ added ignoring reject routes
> to icmp_mtudisc_clone(). Otherwise TCP would clone these routes
> for PMTU discovery. They will not work, even after dynamic routing
> has found a
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:19:10PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> There are thousands of people with smtpd configurations, and sysmerge
> is not going to handle this.
>
> We cannot expect them all to change their files. This is madness.
Well, it wouldn't be the first time. But I agree that such
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses.
> This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug:
Thanks for looking into this. Looks like I got distracted while
ripping out
Hi,
scope is there, just not shown. While there, use proper constants for
two sizes.
-Otto
Index: ktrstruct.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/kdump/ktrstruct.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -p -r1.28 ktrstruct.c
---
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 07:13, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:36:32PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Whenever a rule with a local action (mbox, maildir, lmtp or mda) is matched,
>> smtpd will
>> attempt to search for a ~/.forward file in the recipient
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 02:09, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
> I like this direction but I worry about breaking existing configs.
> How are we going to alert existing users that they need to update
> their configs if the behavior silently changes?
>
> - todd
I agree and this diff was more to suggest
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 10:03, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
>
>
>> On 20 Dec 2020, at 07:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> There are thousands of people with smtpd configurations, and sysmerge
>> is not going to handle this.
>>
>> We cannot expect them all to change their files. This is madness.
>>
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 10:14, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:19:10PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> There are thousands of people with smtpd configurations, and sysmerge
>> is not going to handle this.
>>
>> We cannot expect them all to change their files. This is
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 02:34:09PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > scope is there, just not shown. While there, use proper constants for
> > two sizes.
> >
> > -Otto
> >
> >
> > Index: ktrstruct.c
> >
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:48:01AM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> >
> > as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses.
> > This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug:
>
>
Rewrite parse_netprefix to no longer use isc_sockaddr_fromin{,6}.
Since this was the last user of those functions we can delete them.
That turd seems to be reasonably shiny with this...
OK?
diff --git dighost.c dighost.c
index 116de3a1c6d..b822a92c756 100644
--- dighost.c
+++ dighost.c
@@
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 07:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> There are thousands of people with smtpd configurations, and sysmerge
> is not going to handle this.
>
> We cannot expect them all to change their files. This is madness.
>
> Gilles, I think you should be adding an option that blocks it
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 03:21, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
>> I like this direction but I worry about breaking existing configs.
>> How are we going to alert existing users that they need to update
>> their configs if the behavior silently changes?
>
> I think the
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> scope is there, just not shown. While there, use proper constants for
> two sizes.
>
> -Otto
>
>
> Index: ktrstruct.c
> ===
> RCS file:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 02:34:09PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > scope is there, just not shown. While there, use proper constants for
> > two sizes.
> >
> > -Otto
> >
> >
> > Index: ktrstruct.c
> >
Ping ?
> On 14 Dec 2020, at 11:34, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Upon termination, the parent process will call parent_shutdown() which will
> in turn call mproc_clear() to properly terminate IPC with child processes.
>
> In mproc_clear(), event_del() is called but a check is lacking
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:51:35AM +0100, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
>
>
> > On 20 Dec 2020, at 07:13, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:36:32PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Whenever a rule with a local action (mbox, maildir, lmtp or mda) is
> >>
Hi,
Interesting diff.
I did not have time to look at it thoroughly, but here are a few
observations:
- why do you keep the symmetric filter coefficients? (this could halve
your while-loop computations too, right?)
- the diff's mainlobe look kind of strange at the end, why is that?
What
Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 02:34:09PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > scope is there, just not shown. While there, use proper constants for
> > > two sizes.
> > >
> > > -Otto
> > >
> > >
Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 2020-12-18, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > So I ended up in doas again, this time with the CFLAGS I use for most of
> > my other projects. This popped up a few new not very exciting warnings.
> > Diff below compiles clean with both clang and gcc on amd64.
>
> > static
> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:53:16 -0600
> From: Scott Cheloha
>
> I want to see if a process is waiting in sigsuspend(2) from top(1).
> The current sleep string is "pause", which leaves me wondering what
> the process is actually doing. The string "sigsuspend" would make it
> unambiguous.
>
>
> On 20 Dec 2020, at 18:15, Chris Bennett
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:51:35AM +0100, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Dec 2020, at 07:13, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:36:32PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
Hello,
Whenever a
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:11:07PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:53:16 -0600
> > From: Scott Cheloha
> >
> > I want to see if a process is waiting in sigsuspend(2) from top(1).
> > The current sleep string is "pause", which leaves me wondering what
> > the process is
John,
I'm now able to clone the repo from windows following this commit:
https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/6e49571c59fe1f1e78405e5a57a1e8dc40029e00
Two caveats:
1) if you wanted to bisect the repo on windows or checkout any earlier
commit than the one above, it won't be possible to do from
Short version:
Please test if this patch breaks suspend or hibernate on your
machine. Reply with the results of your test and your dmesg.
Both are still working on my Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 6.
Long version:
This patch converts the remaining tick sleeps in dev/acpi to
nanosecond sleeps.
Playing around with the filter API I want an easier way to send mail
with authentication instead of doing the transaction manually via
openssl or via bloated mailclients. Turns out we already have all the
plumbing in place and just need to hook it up.
OK?
martijn@
Index: smtpc.c
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:07:41 -0300
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 18/12/20(Fri) 08:04, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:34:39 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > Anyway, your analysis is right. When a kernel thread wants to use
> > > pmap_extract(9) on a userland pmap,
I want to see if a process is waiting in sigsuspend(2) from top(1).
The current sleep string is "pause", which leaves me wondering what
the process is actually doing. The string "sigsuspend" would make it
unambiguous.
ok?
Index: kern_sig.c
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Interesting diff.
>
> I did not have time to look at it thoroughly, but here are a few
> observations:
>
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this.
- why do you keep the symmetric filter coefficients? (this could halve your
>
Scott Cheloha writes:
> Short version:
>
> Please test if this patch breaks suspend or hibernate on your
> machine. Reply with the results of your test and your dmesg.
>
> Both are still working on my Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 6.
This breaks resume from zzz on HP EliteBook 840 G1. The
I tested this by diff'ing sysctl output before/after on amd64. Since
there's a bunch of ifdef'ness I verified RAMDISK still builds.
I deliberately didn't fix the indentation to keep this diff a pure line
motion (would run over 80 chars otherwise). I can either fix that it in
a separate commit or
32 matches
Mail list logo
