Moving from ports@.
Quick intro:
A library (gstreamer1) uses functions from another library (libsoup)
which exists in two incompatible versions (libsoup-2.4.so.XX and
libsoup-3.0.so.XX).
Other software calling gstreamer might use one or other of these two
libsoups for its own purposes, so
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:45:44PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2022/08/10 15:07:15 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 11:10:22AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > blob - ddf83f965d0e6a99ada695694bea77b775bae2aa
> > > blob + 1d577ba63efca388ca3644d1a52d9b3d9f246014
> > > ---
On 2022-08-11 11:39 +02, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:45:44PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
>> On 2022/08/10 15:07:15 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 11:10:22AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
>> > Should slowcgi kill the command if SCRIPT_DONE is not set?
>>
>>
On 2022/08/10 19:37, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 02:22:08AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10 2022, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > 1. Our ksh(1) already checks for stdout errors in the echo builtin.
> >
> > So do any of the scripts in our
Hi,
ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() do nearly the same thing, but they
are implemented differently.
The idea of this diff is to move things around. Then only differences
from the IP standards but not in coding style remain. This allows
to compare both functions easily.
In IPv4 assume that
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:49:12AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2022-08-11 11:39 +02, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:45:44PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> >> On 2022/08/10 15:07:15 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 11:10:22AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
>
subscribe
There is no need to make a deep copy of the certificate that was
deserialized as part of the d2i_CMS_ContentInfo() call. We can as
well keep a reference to it.
While X509_dup() can actually fail, X509_up_ref() can't. It seems
cleaner to have a check.
Index: cms.c
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 06:05:30PM +0100, Laurence Tratt wrote:
> The Framework clickpad (a PixArt PIXA3854) announces that it has 4 buttons
> which defeats the normal heuristic of "2 or more buttons means it's a
> touchpad". When it's identified as a touchpad, right hand mouse clicks don't
>
Hi,
The IPv6 routing header type 0 check should modify *offp only in
case of an error, so that the genrated icmp6 packet has the correct
pointer. After successful return, *offp should not be modified.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet6/ip6_input.c
Reading through the fcgi code of httpd I wonder if HEAD requests are
handled correctly. In server_fcgi_read() the function just returns when it
hits the HEAD case but I think this is not correct since it does not drain
the clt_srvevb buffer and it kind of ignores possible padding bytes.
I think
Hi,
There are some places in ip and ip6 input where operations fail due
to out of memory. I think a generic idropped counter is useful for
those.
ok?
bluhm
Index: sys/netinet/ip_input.c
===
RCS file:
On 2022/08/11 19:37:08 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Reading through the fcgi code of httpd I wonder if HEAD requests are
> handled correctly. In server_fcgi_read() the function just returns when it
> hits the HEAD case but I think this is not correct since it does not drain
> the clt_srvevb
This is a good one.
$ renice -n -1 -p 1 ; echo $?
renice: setpriority: 1: Operation not permitted
1
$ renice -n -1 -p 1 1 ; echo $?
renice: setpriority: 1: Operation not permitted
renice: setpriority: 1: Operation not permitted
2
$ renice -n -1 -p 1 1 1 ; echo $?
renice: setpriority: 1: Operation
Hi,
I recently purchased a VisionFive board (8GB of RAM + video) and
wanted to run OpenBSD on it. The FAQ states that this board
needs "Some firmware configuration tweaks" to boot OpenBSD.
I have searched the mailing list archives on marc.info and was
unable to find anything on this. I have
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 08:41:43PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2022/08/11 19:37:08 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Reading through the fcgi code of httpd I wonder if HEAD requests are
> > handled correctly. In server_fcgi_read() the function just returns when it
> > hits the HEAD case but I think
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:08 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Fix is to just set error instead of incrementing it.
Sure. OK millert@
- todd
enh writes:
> is there a CVE or PoC for the zlib bug? it seems like OpenBSD is the
> only place where this has been fixed, and none of the various
> upstreams/forks of zlib (of which there are far too many!) seem to
> have this?
>
See upstream:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:07:53PM -0700, enh wrote:
> is there a CVE or PoC for the zlib bug? it seems like OpenBSD is the
> only place where this has been fixed, and none of the various
> upstreams/forks of zlib (of which there are far too many!) seem to
> have this?
Details are here:
Hello OpenBSD devs,
Background
--
As some might know, FreeBSD gained an interface for querying ESRT
about a year ago ([1], [2]), which was done as part of [3].
[1]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/rGd12d651f8692cfcaf6fd0a6e8264c29547f644c9
[2]:
Hello OpenBSD devs,
Background
--
As some might know, FreeBSD gained an interface for querying ESRT
about a year ago ([1], [2]), which was done as part of [3].
[1]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/rGd12d651f8692cfcaf6fd0a6e8264c29547f644c9
[2]:
Hello,
Added support for utf-8 editing in emacs mode and vi mode for ksh,
and fixed some utf-8 encoding issues.
it is good?
Index: bin/ksh/emacs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/emacs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -p -u
Hello,
Added support for utf-8 editing in emacs mode and vi mode for ksh,
and fixed some utf-8 encoding issues.
it is good?
Index: bin/ksh/emacs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/emacs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -p -u
Hello,
Added support for utf-8 editing in emacs mode and vi mode for ksh,
and fixed some utf-8 encoding issues.
it is good?
Index: bin/ksh/emacs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/emacs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -p -u
Errata patches for zlib have been released for OpenBSD 7.0 and 7.1.
Binary updates for the amd64, i386 and arm64 platform are available
via the syspatch utility. Source code patches can be found on the
respective errata page:
https://www.openbsd.org/errata70.html
Booting off softraid on arm64 is supported but installboot(8) has no
softraid(4) support on arm64.
This means installboot always copies the single bootstrap efiboot on the
root volume and completely ignores softraid chunks, so root on softraid
on arm64 is unable to boot unless one manually drops
26 matches
Mail list logo
