On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Bob Beck wrote:
>
> But what if I like json and I am already set up to be a hipster and
> feed all the untrusted inputs through jq..
>
> (ok beck@)
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:37:25PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> > not helpful:
> > $ doas acme-client
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 6:35 PM Sven F. wrote:
> Dear reader,
>
> i tested 6.8-beta and WG
>
> After going for behind NAT to behind NAT experiment ,
> i went for two 'clients' behind a NAT to an openBSD device with a public IP
> called here 'Server'
>
> First of all
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 2:07 PM Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:06:32PM -0400, Sven F. wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM sven falempin
> > wrote:
> >
>
> Can you send a proper diff please for review please ?
>
bpf.c is sor
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:11 AM Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 01:25:14PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 05/08/20(Wed) 12:50, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > pipex(4) and pppx(4) are ready to became a little bit more MP capable.
> > > Diff below moves pppx(4) related
-- Forwarded message -
From: Vitaliy Makkoveev
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: pppx(4): move ifnet out of KERNEL_LOCK()
To: Sven F.
What reaction do you expect? Look, you did something and you got panic
with *not* modified system. What is expected you will do
Never seen before crash ( 6. 7 stable )
My devices run a lot of things in, load is easily 4
which is good for breaking lock code ?
uvm_fault(0xfd820a916cc0, 0x8, 0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at bridge_brlconf+0x24:movq0x8(%rdi),%rax
ddb{1}>
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:14 AM Sven F. wrote:
>
> Never seen before crash ( 6. 7 stable )
>
> My devices run a lot of things in, load is easily 4
> which is good for breaking lock code ?
>
> uvm_fault(0xfd820a916cc0, 0x8, 0, 1) -> e
> kernel: page f
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:27 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 29 Jul 2020, at 00:09, sven falempin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:42 PM Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:10:01PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I am running some
Dear readers,
pfctl -vv -ss shows detailed information on states.
I would like to improve the information provided about specific TCP connections,
regarding the latency of the network.
An obvious way seems to be to measure the time to get ACKs back.
Another way would be to use packets timestamps.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:53 AM Alexandr Nedvedicky
wrote:
>
> Hello Sven,
>
> your change makes me wonder: 'what is the actual problem you are trying to
> solve'?
>
> the reason I'm asking is that latency is just one factor, which contributes to
> TCP connection performance. The other factor
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:51 PM David Gwynne wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:50:12AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > >
> > > ok. i don't know how to split up the rest of the change though.
> > >
> > > here's an updated diff that includes the rest of the kernel changes
Index: rdomain.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/rdomain.4,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 rdomain.4
--- rdomain.4 24 Sep 2020 11:05:32 - 1.17
+++ rdomain.4 19 May 2021 14:51:37 -
@@ -139,7 +139,8
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:55 AM Sven F. wrote:
> Index: rdomain.4
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/rdomain.4,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -u -p -r1.17 rdomain.4
> --- rdomain.4 24 Sep 2020 11:05:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:21 PM Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:55:11AM -0400, Sven F. wrote:
> > Index: rdomain.4
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/rdomain.4,v
> > retrie
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:29 PM Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 01:42:51PM -0400, Sven F. wrote:
> > Line 120 , in renice.8
> >
> > https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/usr.bin/renice/renice.8#L120
> >
> > # renice -n +1 987
Line 120 , in renice.8
https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/usr.bin/renice/renice.8#L120
# renice -n +1 987 -u daemon root -p 32
should be
# renice -n +1 -g 987 -u daemon root -p 32 ?
--- usr.bin/renice/renice.8.orig 2021-04-06 13:41:09.272347600 -0400
+++ usr.bin/renice/renice.8
Bienvenue,
--- /usr/sbin/sysupgrade.oldTue May 16 18:53:13 2023
+++ /usr/sbin/sysupgradeTue May 16 19:04:46 2023
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
case ${_LINE} in
*\ ${_KEY})SIGNIFY_KEY=/etc/signify/${_KEY} ;;
*\ ${_NEXTKEY})SIGNIFY_KEY=/etc/signify/${_NEXTKEY} ;;
+*\ *.pub)
17 matches
Mail list logo
