Yes,
ok yasuoka
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 03:02:55 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> This time pipex(4) related ioctl(2) calls PIPEX{S,G}MODE are pretty
> dummy and were kept for backward compatibility reasons. The diff below
> removes them.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: share/man/man4/pipex.4
> ==
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:54:36 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> Does anybody please review my code?
>
> Yasuoka-san is my coleague of my work.
> So, he is interested in this topic. That’s why I CCed this mail.
> I don’t mean he is an reviewer.
>
>> 2021/01/12 11:27、Yuichiro NAITO のメール:
>> I have
Yes,
ok yasuoka
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:32:39 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Since OpenBSD 6.7 npppd(8) can't work over tun(4) anymore. I propose to
> remove dummy TUNSIFMODE ioctl(2) call.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
> ===
> RCS
ok yasuoka
Thanks,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:06:08 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> `sc_dead' is used to prevent pppac_ioctl() be called on dying pppac(4)
> interface. But now if_detach() makes dying `ifp' inaccessible and waits
> for references which are in-use. This logic is not required anymore.
Hi,
My vaio repeatedly crashed by "Data modified on freelist"(*1) or other
memory corruptions. After my long time debug, I found the route cause
is a handling of references of LocalX, like the following:
If ((SMRW (0x0B, 0x16, 0x21, RefOf (Local0)) == Zero))
In the called co
Hi,
Let me update "diff #2".
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:42:32 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> My vaio repeatedly crashed by "Data modified on freelist"(*1) or other
> memory corruptions. After my long time debug, I found the route cause
> is a handling of r
Hi,
efiboot cannot load the kernel properly on some machines if booted
from CD-ROM. In that case boot fails with a message like follow:
booting cd0a:. [359648read symbols: Unknown error: code 255
As far as Asou and my test, this happens on hosts on VMware ESXi 6.7,
7.0 and asou's physica
versed..
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:35:41 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> efiboot cannot load the kernel properly on some machines if booted
> from CD-ROM. In that case boot fails with a message like follow:
>
>booting cd0a:. [359648read symbols: Unknown error: code 255
>
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:15:58 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:35:41 +0900 (JST)
>> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > efiboot cannot load the kernel properly on some machines if booted
>> > from CD-ROM. In that case boot fa
Hi,
I hit a problem which is caused by going back of monotonic time. It
happens on hosts on VMware ESXi.
I wrote the program which repeats the problem.
% cc -o monotime monotime.c -lpthread
% ./monotime
194964 Starting
562210 Starting
483046 Starting
148865 Starting
148865 Back 991.80804
like 900, 900, 900, 900, 0, 900, 900, 900 you pick 0 which could lead
> to some problems, right? Or am I missing something?"
>
> So could people give the minimum skew approach a spin on real machines
> to see if there are any issues popping up?
>
> All the best,
> Paul
>
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:30:43 +0100
Jan Klemkow wrote:
> If you want to boot OpenBSD on an HP EliteBook 830 G7/G8, the bootloader
> will hang while loading the kernel. Because, the UEFI loads the
> bootloader on the same place in memory, where the bootloader will copy
> the kernel. We are un
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:43:23 +0900 (JST)
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:30:43 +0100
>> Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> > If you want to boot O
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:41:35 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Scott Cheloha
>> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:18:04 -0500
>> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:40:21PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Which diff did you apply? Yasuoka provided two diffs.
>>
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:43:00 +0300
Paul Irofti wrote:
> On 05.04.2021 06:13, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 02:00:01PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:41:35 +0100 (CET)
>>> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>>>> From: S
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 19:14:49 +0900 (JST)
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:43:00 +0300
>> Paul Irofti wrote:
>> > On 05.04.2021 06:13, Scott
pr 2021 09:21:40 +0200
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 07:14:49PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Another issue that I see is that people have not reported, at least
> [...]
>> > publicly, that this runs fine on their normal OpenBSD
Hello,
Let me ask "ok",
The diff fixes the problem as follows:
Configure wg0 without wgrtable
# ifconfig wg0 create wgport 7111 wgkey `openssl rand -base64 32` up
# ifconfig wg0
wg0: flags=80c3 mtu 1420
index 6 priority 0 llprio 3
ok yasuoka
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:31:47 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> We don't use "static" keyword for functions declaration to allow ddb(4)
> debug. Also, many "Static" functions are called by pppx(4) layer outside
> pipex(4) layer.
>
> This is the mostly mechanic diff, except the `pipex_pp
ok yasuoka
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:50:37 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> pipex(4) doesn't rely on netlock anymore.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pppx.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.119
> diff -u -p
b64decode(8) fails if a long line is given.
% wc test
1 11370 test
%
% ./b64decode -r test > /dev/null
b64decode: test: /dev/stdout: error decoding base64 input stream
%
uudecode.c
426 static int
427 base64_decode(void)
428 {
429 int n;
430
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:56:53 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:18:01AM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> @@ -423,11 +423,13 @@ uu_decode(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +#define ROUNDDOWN(x,y) (((x)/(y)) * (y))
>> +
>> static
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:09:40 +0200
Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 01:01:47PM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:56:53 +0200
>> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:18:01AM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> >
Hi,
Tested.
ok yasuoka
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:41:29 +0200
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looks like syzkaller has found a missing input validation in pipex.
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c7ac769bd7ee15549b8a2be188bcee07d98a5357
>
> As I have no pipex setup, can anyone test thi
Hello,
For HTTP request body, if neither "Content-Encoding: chunked" nor
"Content-Length" is specified, it should mean body length is 0.
In RFC 9112 Section 6.3, 7.:
| 7. If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then
| the message body length is zero (no message body
Hi,
The diff is to fix a problem in a complex setup.
Normal setup of divert-reply for TCP connection:
client --- relayd --- server
- transparently forward TCP connections
- divert-reply is configured the outbound connection to the server
- so that the PF state is removed when the PCB is de
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:40:13 +0200
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:04:34PM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> The diff is to fix a problem in a complex setup.
>>
>> Normal setup of divert-reply for TCP connection:
>>
>>
ok yasuoka
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:44:29 +0200
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> + now = READ_ONCE(tcp_now);
> +
> /*
>* Determine length of data that should be transmitted,
>* and flags that will be used.
> @@ -228,7 +231,7 @@ tcp_output(struct tcpcb *tp)
>* to send, then
Hello,
My colleague hit the following kernel panic when he is doing "psctl
-ss" repeatedly by a script during a performance test.
uvm_fault(0xfd811b869110, 0x10, 0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at pf_state_export+0x42: movq0x10(%rax),%rcx
TIDPIDUI
Hello,
On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:37:35 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:58:13 -0600
>> Userland may not ask the kernel to allocate such a huge object. The
>> kernel address space is quite small. First off, huge allocations will
>> fail.
>>
>> But
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:58:20 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:37:35 +0900 (JST)
> Masato Asou wrote:
>> From: "Theo de Raadt"
>> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:58:13 -0600
>>> Userland may not ask the kernel to allocate such a huge obj
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:41:18 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:58:20 +0900 (JST)
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:37:35 +0900 (JST)
>> Masato Asou wrote:
>>> From: "Theo de Raadt"
>>> Date: Tue, 04 Oct
It doesn't seem to have a problem. Sorry for my delay.
ok yasuoka
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 13:24:21 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> ping...
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:16:02PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Push netlock down to pppx_add_session(). The 'pppx_if' structure has
>> the `pxi_read
Hi,
asr_run.3 is explaining that ar_rrsetinfo must be freed only for the
blocking function, but I think it must be freed regardless of the
function blocking type.
ok?
Index: lib/libc/asr/asr_run.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/asr
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:14:47 +0300
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> After changing tcp now tick to milliseconds, it will wrap around
> after 49 days of uptime. That may be a problem in some places of
> our stack. Better use a 64 bit counter.
I agree since we sometimes hit a problem from where we could n
Hi,
Does using 64 bit for timer in tcpcb require this?
ok?
Index: sys/netinet/tcp.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp.h,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 tcp.h
--- sys/netinet/tcp.h 19 May 2023 01:04:39 -
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:43:21 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> @@ -411,7 +412,7 @@ tcp_stats_display(unsigned long long tot
>> P(tcpi, rcv_up, "%u")
>> P(tcpi, rcv_wscale, "%hhu")
>> P(tcpi, rfbuf_cnt, "%u")
>> -P(tcpi,
Hi,
This netstat diff is already needed to avoid compiler warnings since
it uses struct tcpcb directly.
ok?
Index: usr.bin/netstat/inet.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c,v
retrieving revision 1.177
diff -u -p -r1.177 i
Hi,
I'd like to expand the counters in struct mbstat from u_short to u_long.
When I was debugging a mbuf leak, I saw the result of "netstat -m"
---
28647 mbufs in use:
28551 mbufs allocated to data
4 mbufs allocated to packet headers
92 mbufs allocated to socket names and
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:56:42 +0200
Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:53:33PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote:
>> I am planning to restructure the APM/sleep APIs to make it easier to suspend
>> from more places like as a suspend keyboard shortcut.
>>
>> The acpiioctl handler is x86 speci
Hi,
The diff makes the mbstat be the same size which is actually used.
Also revert the previous that the mbstat is located on the stack.
ok?
Index: sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c,v
retrieving re
On Sat, 08 Jul 2023 21:58:30 +0300 (EEST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> The diff makes the mbstat be the same size which is actually used.
> Also revert the previous that the mbstat is located on the stack.
The userland program also needed to be changed.
ok?
Index: sys/kern/kern_sy
Hi,
I noticed that the keyboard doesn't work for RAMDISK kernel on HP DL20
Gen10. The kernel assigns wsdisplay0 for VGA and wsdisplay1 for
efifb. But actually the glass console is efieb but it doesn't have
any keyboard assigned because the keyboard is assigned to wsdisplay0.
GENERIC kernel does
Hello,
New vaio has an audio device which is not configured.
"Intel 700 Series HD Audio" rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
0:31:3: Intel unknown
0x: Vendor ID: 8086, Product ID: 51ca
0x0004: Command: 0006, Status: 0010
0x0008: Class: 04 Multimedia,
Hi,
Update the AC status when the battery notification is happened.
Because the AC status notification doesn't happen on some machines.
My vaio actually has this problem.
Also Linux is doing the same thing
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.4/drivers/acpi/ac.c#L165-L183
ok? comments?
In
pm」を使うことができます。
>
> Battery level (percent) checking/バッテリーのレベル（パーセント）を確認するため：apm -l
> Estimated battery duration (minutes)/バッテリーが持つ予定の時間まで（分）を確認するため：apm -m
>
> On 2023年08月17日 16:12, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Update the AC status when the battery notifi
Let me clarify some.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:12:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Update the AC status when the battery notification is happened.
> Because the AC status notification doesn't happen on some machines.
At that time (plugging or unpluggin the AC), a battery n
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:07:27 -0500
joshua stein wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 16:12:07 +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Update the AC status when the battery notification is happened.
>> Because the AC status notification doesn't happen on some machin
Hi,
After 6.9 packets passed by "route-to" started to be evaluated when
output. As the result, states are created for output direction,
because it is not considered about "direct server return", has some
problems (eg. the state is deleted because the state tracking is
failed.)
relayd(8) creates
ping.
I think we have no reason not having this.
Alternatively acpiac_notify_triggered can be deleted and doing the
triggering unconditionally is also good because it's simpler.
comments? ok?
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:12:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Update the
A leak may happens when wgpeer is deleted.
ok?
The state queue should be freeed when wg_peer is destroyed.
diff from IIJ.
Index: sys/net/if_wg.c
===
RCS file: /disk/cvs/openbsd/src/sys/net/if_wg.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:38:40 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> This makes ifnet protection consistent. Execute vmt_tclo_tick() timeout
> handler in process context to allow context switch within
> vmt_tclo_broadcastip().
ok yasuoka
> Index: sys/dev/pv/vmt.c
> =
Hi,
Thank you for your test and feedback.
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:38:24 -0600
Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:41 PM YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The problems you are pointing seem to be the same problem.
>>
>> > I&#
Hi,
Sorry for my silence.
ok yasuoka for the daemon part.
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:27:10 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 31/03/20(Tue) 23:16, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 06:15:46PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > Well better fix npppd(8), no? Not crashing
ok yasuoka
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 19:54:20 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Deny to create pipex_session which is already exist. Newly created
> session will be placed to list head so the caller of
> pipex_*_lookup_session() will receive wrong session.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
>
Hi,
The diff followings fixes panics when using pppac(4) with "pipex no".
Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pppx.c,v
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -p -r1.83 if_pppx.c
--- sys/net/if_pppx.c 10 Apr 2020 07
Hi,
I'd like to conclude this issue.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:09:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> I am testing a new hardware, HPE DL20 Gen10.
>
> When efiboot starts the kernel, the video display becomes distorted
> and never recovered until CPU reset.
>
&
On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:01:48 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to conclude this issue.
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:09:07 +0900 (JST)
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> I am testing a new hardware, HPE DL20 Gen10.
>>
>> When efiboot sta
On Thu, 28 May 2020 12:31:31 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:01:48 +0900 (JST)
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to conclude this issue.
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:09:07 +0900 (JST)
>>
Hi,
pf.conf:
anchor {
pass in on rdomain 102 quick proto tcp to 10.0.0.101 port 8080 \
keep state ( sloppy ) route-to \
least-states sticky-address
}
table {
10.0.0.11@pair102
}
this doesn't work. All packets going to 10.0.0.101 are dropped with
'no-route'. The pr
Hello,
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:30:56 +0200
Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> I'm OK with your change.
Thank you for your review and comment.
> However I would like to ask you to do yet another test. I wonder if things
> will eventually work on unfixed PF if rules will be constructed as follows:
>
>
The line in etc/mtree/special should be updated as well.
npppd.conf type=file mode=0640 uname=root gname=wheel
other than that, ok yasuoka
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:48:44 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> We installing `npppd-users' with uid:gid root:wheel and mode 0600
> because it consists
Yes, this seems right.
ok yasuoka
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 23:53:25 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> While pppac(4) destroy sessions by pipex_iface_fini() or by
> pipex_ioctl() with PIPEXSMODE command, some sessions can be linked to
> `state_list'. This case is not checked and sessions will never be
Hi,
When "::/0" is used as "default",
# route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em0: Invalid argument
route command trims the sockaddr to { .len = 2, .family = AF_INET6 }
for "::/0", but rtable_satoplen() refuses it. I think it should be
accepted.
ok?
Allow sockaddr for p
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:23 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>>
>> # route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
>> add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:45:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:23 +0200
> Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:18:17 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:55:10PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> The function mask_addr() doesn't mask address for IPv4 and IPv6. Does
>> any address family other than IPv4 or IPv6 require #1142:1148? The
>&
Hi,
Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients
behind a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
There is two problems. First is pipex(4) doesn't pass the proper
ipsecflowinfo to ip_output(). Second is the IPsec po
On Wed, 12 May 2021 17:26:51 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:11:09PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind a NAT
>> cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>>
&g
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:15:29 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> On 12 May 2021, at 18:42, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 May 2021 17:26:51 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:11:09PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>>>
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind
> a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>
> https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
>
> There is two problems.
Hi,
> The next command of GDB does not work properly.
> I use OpenBSD 6.3 and /usr/bin/gdb (GDB 6.3).
It seems that gdb can't read the dwarf generated by clang properly.
I found a better fix at the upstream.
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca5f395d6255337974262b
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:37:33 +0100
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/07/12 16:16, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > The next command of GDB does not work properly.
>> > I use OpenBSD 6.3 and /usr/bin/gdb (GDB 6.3).
>>
>> It seems that gdb can't read the dwarf gen
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:14:19 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On 2018/07/12 16:16, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> > The next command of GDB does not work properly.
>>> > I use OpenBSD 6.3 and /usr/bin/gdb (GDB 6.3).
>>>
>>> It seems that gdb
Hi,
> panic: trap type 0x34 (mem address not aligned): pc=15864ec
> npc=15864f0 pstate=99820006
(snip)
> o...@eigenstate.org and I put together the following diff. I haven't been able
> to check with the original reporter, and I don't have a machine to test it on,
> so comments and/or tests would
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:05:08 -0700
Ori Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:38:28 +0900 (JST), YASUOKA Masahiko
> wrote:
>> As far as I know, switch(4) assumes it receives packets located at 64
>> bit aligned memory. So if the code like below
>>
>>
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:50:13 +0200
Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
>> I haven't been able to type the passphrase of my softraid device on
>> boot when using an external keyboard on my Thinkpad X260. Finally I
>> had some time to debug this pr
Hi,
I think the diff should be brought to arm64 as well. ok?
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:21:57 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:50:13 +0200
> Theo Buehler wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
>>> I haven&#x
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:52 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:50:51AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I think the diff should be brought to arm64 as well.
Hi,
Committed the diff for command. Thanks.
As for the man page, it makes sense for me.
ok yasuoka
On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:33:37 +0200
Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Solene Rapenne wrote:
>> Naoki Fukaumi wrote:
>> > hi tech@,
>> >
>> > new cpu state, CP_SPIN, was added,
>> > https://marc.info/?l
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:00:14 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> When I use /usr/bin/bc command with MALLOC_OPTIONS=UJ, SEGV was
> occurred in libedit.
>
> $ MALLOC_OPTIONS=UJ /usr/bin/bc
> 10 + 20 + 30 + 40 + 50 + 60 + 70 + 80 +
> 90 + Segmentation fault (c
Hi,
# drop ccing misc@
The diff seems ok for me.
ok to commit it in?
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:42:04 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> Following patch changes pkg_add to return a error code,
> if a package name is wrong.
>
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
> b/usr.sbin/pkg_add/Ope
I'd like to clarify "aes" in ipsec.conf accepts 128:256 bits.
sbin/ipsecctl/ike.c:
201 case ENCXF_AES:
202 enc_alg = "AES";
203 key_length = "128,128:256";
204 br
ok?
Clarify that ANY can be used for several parameters of IPsec transform.
Index: sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.135
diff -u -p -r1.135 isakmpd.conf.5
--- sbin/
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:03:43 +
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:02:07PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> I'd like to clarify "aes" in ipsec.conf accepts 128:256 bits.
>>
>> sbin/ipsecctl/ike.c:
>> 201
Hi,
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind
> a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>
> https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
>
> There is two p
Hi,
Let me update the diff. Previous has a problem in ipsp_spd_lookup()
which uses "rn" without initialization.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:44:20 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Radek reported a
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 00:27:06 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:53:34PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This question is mostly for bluhm@. Should the gettdbbyflow() grab the
>> extra reference on returned `tdbp' like other other gettdb*() do? I'm
>> pointing th
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:20:49 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I don't know much about l2tp, pipex or npppd. So I cannot say if
> the new logic is correct. But I guess you have tested that.
Yes, I've tested some L2TP/IPsec cases already.
> The tdb mutex and ref counting looks correct.
>
>>
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:20:46 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:25:20PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Yes, if there is another better idea, it will be welcome.
>> For this moment, the diff is the best idea for me.
>
> Sorry, no better idea.
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:55:04 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> Note that IPsec still has the workaround to disable multiple queues.
>
> I think we can remove the ipsec_in_use workaround now. The IPsec
> path is protected wi
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 21:50:47 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 04:16:28PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > > - npppd l2pt ipsecflowinfo is not MP safe
>> >
>>
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:42:02 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:00:30AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> inet_makenetandmask() had required another treatment.
>>
>> Also -prefixlen 0 for -inet has a bug
>>
>> % doas ./obj/route -T1
Let me updated the diff.
On Mon, 06 Jul 2020 17:54:30 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:42:02 +0200
> Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:00:30AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> inet_makenetandmask() had required another tre
Hi,
Currently when using the real mac address for carp(4) interface, all
packets are treated as their receive inteface is carp. This causes
some problems.
For example, IPv6 ndp doesn't work on an interface which is used for
carpdev. Because it is assumed that reply packets are received with
the
The problem I was to fix had been fixed by dlg@'s commit today.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=159538265604770&w=2
So the diff is not needed any more. Pointed out by dlg@.
Thanks,
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:24:32 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current
Hi,
Last month, I fixed the problem "route-to least-state" in an anchor
didn't work.
https://marc.info/?t=15911745782&r=1&w=2
I noticed the same problem happens on "random" and "srchash" as well.
ok?
Use the table on root always if current table is not active.
Index: sys/net/pf_lb.c
=
Hi,
The diff fixes 2 problems of "least-states":
- states whose address is selected by sticky-address is not counted
for the number of states.
- interface is not selected properly if selected table entry specifies
an interface.
ok?
Increase state counter for least-states when the address is
Hi,
Thank you for your review.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:25:42 +0200
Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
>> - interface is not selected properly if selected table entry specifies
>> an interface.
>
> to be honest I don't quite understand what's going on here.
> can you share some details of confi
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:44:43 +0200
Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:01:18PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Last month, I fixed the problem "route-to least-state" in an anchor
>> didn't work.
>>
>>
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
