Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes: [...] Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback? Regardless of the

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Kenneth Westerback
On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes: [...] Does no one want to

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Kenneth Westerback
On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Fritjof

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes: Hi tech, Hi, if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this: - comparison between signed and unsigned - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression I'm not quite sure if the typecasts are at the correct place, but these diffs

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:35:11PM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote: On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2014

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:01:52PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes: Hi tech, Hi, if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this: - comparison between signed and unsigned - signed and unsigned type in conditional

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-09 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 18:50, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: But if you like OpenRCS as it is and don't want to get any diffs unless security fixes, then just say it. Or if you work on other stuff and you don't have time for that, then just say it. Personally, I don't much like to see diffs

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-07 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech, if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this: - comparison between signed and unsigned - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression I'm not quite sure if the typecasts are at the correct place,

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-07 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes: [...] Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback? Regardless of the content of your diff, the date of your mail was: Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:57:57 +0200 I doubt there are developers that are paid full-time to improve rcs,

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

2014-05-07 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: Fritjof Bornebusch frit...@alokat.org writes: [...] Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback? Regardless of the content of your diff, the date of your mail was: Date: Tue, 6 May 2014