On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 Feb 2018, at 5:00 pm, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>> Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 21:20:20 -0800:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Flo
> On 22 Feb 2018, at 5:00 pm, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>> Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 21:20:20 -0800:
>>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Am 20.02.2018 um 11:15 schrieb Klem
Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.21 23:00:22 -0800:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 21:20:20 -0800:
> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Am 20.02.2018 um 1
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:00:22PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
> Ah, right. I hope I can just update the man page to explicitly mention
> this. I've also made it a bit more concise as jmc had suggested.
Looks good and works as advertised in a quick test. ok stsp@
> Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.8
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 21:20:20 -0800:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 20.02.2018 um 11:15 schrieb Klemens Nanni :
> > >>
> > >>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58
Hi Ayaka, All,
the diff from a user experience point of view :) ... ill stop right there...
I was going to ask another slightly related question regarding
ifconfig output consistency
would there be a way to display the rdomain of interfaces that are in
the default rdomain , as rdomain
just
>From be...@openbsd.org Wed Feb 21 07:48:51 2018
>Delivered-To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:48:49 +0100
>From: Sebastian Benoit
>To: Theo de Raadt
>Cc: akosh...@openbsd.org, r...@openbsd.org, k...@openbsd.org, tech@openbsd.org
>Subject: Re: ifconfig
Theo de Raadt(dera...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 22:27:27 -0700:
>
> If you read through all the options in the manual page carefully,
> ifconfig is not consistant. As a result it cannot use getopt.
> It isn't a POSIX argument grammar. It grew up with that funky
> table, and there we are.
>
> B
Ayaka Koshibe(akosh...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.20 21:20:20 -0800:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> >
> >> Am 20.02.2018 um 11:15 schrieb Klemens Nanni :
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
> >>> This diff would allow saying 'ifconfig fo
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:49:30PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I haven't tested this idea, though.
> > Does your change work without the new function unsetrdomain?
> > I.e. a diff which only adds this to ifconfig.c:
> >
> > + { "-
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
>> Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c,v
>> retrieving revision
If you read through all the options in the manual page carefully,
ifconfig is not consistant. As a result it cannot use getopt.
It isn't a POSIX argument grammar. It grew up with that funky
table, and there we are.
Both cases occur. "-option argument" and "-option". There is
even at least one
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
>> Am 20.02.2018 um 11:15 schrieb Klemens Nanni :
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
>>> This diff would allow saying 'ifconfig foo -rdomain' instead of 'ifconfig
>>> foo rdomain 0'.
>> I can see where you'r
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
> Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.353
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.353 ifconfig.c
> --- sbin/ifconfi
> Am 20.02.2018 um 11:15 schrieb Klemens Nanni :
>
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
>> This diff would allow saying 'ifconfig foo -rdomain' instead of 'ifconfig
>> foo rdomain 0'.
> I can see where you're coming from but this breaks semantics: `-option'
> clears
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 05:09:58PM -0800, Ayaka Koshibe wrote:
> This diff would allow saying 'ifconfig foo -rdomain' instead of 'ifconfig foo
> rdomain 0'.
I can see where you're coming from but this breaks semantics: `-option'
clears an optional parameter or deconfigures functionality whereas
`r
16 matches
Mail list logo
