On 25.6.2022. 22:29, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> There is a bug in the firmware of ix(4) NICs, at least with chip 82599 and
> x540. I could not test it with x550 chips, but i guess they have the same
> bug.
Hi,
I've tested tso with latest snapshot on x552 with or without vlan and
everything seems to
On 10.6.2022. 0:24, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried with trunk lacp and tagged vlan700 over trunk0 and it's working
> as expected. Everything is the same as before, only aggr0 is now trunk0.
>
> with tso
> [ 4] 17.00-18.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.39 Gbits/sec 22622 KBytes
> [ 4]
On 10.6.2022. 10:37, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> while sending traffic from linux to openbsd ix0 with tso
netstat while sending traffic
smc24# netstat -sp tcp
tcp:
1933441 packets sent
3923 data packets (684390 bytes)
0 data packets (0 bytes)
On 10.6.2022. 10:20, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
>> On 10 Jun 2022, at 08:24, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>
>> On 9.6.2022. 19:25, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> On 9.6.2022. 19:11, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:25:22AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 8.6.2022. 22:01, Hrvoje
> On 10 Jun 2022, at 08:24, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>
> On 9.6.2022. 19:25, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 9.6.2022. 19:11, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:25:22AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
On 8.6.2022. 22:01, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 8.6.2022. 15:04, Jan
On 9.6.2022. 19:25, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 9.6.2022. 19:11, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:25:22AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> On 8.6.2022. 22:01, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
On 8.6.2022. 15:04, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Could you show me, how your setup and your
On 9.6.2022. 19:11, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:25:22AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 8.6.2022. 22:01, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> On 8.6.2022. 15:04, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Could you show me, how your setup and your configuration looks like?
>>> Yes, of course ..
>>>
>>>
On 8.6.2022. 22:01, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 8.6.2022. 15:04, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> Could you show me, how your setup and your configuration looks like?
> Yes, of course ..
>
> All my lab boxes are connected to switch (no flow-control). In this
> setup ix0 and ix1 are in aggr and vlans 700 and
On 8.6.2022. 15:04, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Could you show me, how your setup and your configuration looks like?
Yes, of course ..
All my lab boxes are connected to switch (no flow-control). In this
setup ix0 and ix1 are in aggr and vlans 700 and 800 are tagged on aggr3.
I have tried tcpbench and
On 4.6.2022. 21:23, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 1.6.2022. 11:21, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> I moved the switch to ifconfig(8) in the diff below.
>>
>> # ifconfig ix0 tso
>> # ifconfig ix0 -tso
>>
>> I named it tso (TCP segment offloading), so I can reuse this switch
>> also for the sending part. TSO
On 4.6.2022. 21:23, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've put this diff in production on clean source from this morning and
> got panic. I'm not 100% sure if it's because of TSO because in a last
> monts i had all kinds of diffs on production boxes.
> Now I will run spanshot maybe clean
On 1.6.2022. 11:21, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> I moved the switch to ifconfig(8) in the diff below.
>
> # ifconfig ix0 tso
> # ifconfig ix0 -tso
>
> I named it tso (TCP segment offloading), so I can reuse this switch
> also for the sending part. TSO is the combination of LRO and LSO.
>
> LRO: Large
Might need "make obj"
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 31 May 2022 10:22:46 Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
On 27.5.2022. 18:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
The following diff enables the TCP Large Receive Offloading feature for
ix(4) interfaces. It also includes a default off
On 31.5.2022. 11:36, Theo Buehler wrote:
>> smc24# cd /usr/src && make includes
>
> Do 'cd /usr/src && make obj' first.
>
Yes, thank you ...
> smc24# cd /usr/src && make includes
Do 'cd /usr/src && make obj' first.
On 27.5.2022. 18:25, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff enables the TCP Large Receive Offloading feature for
> ix(4) interfaces. It also includes a default off sysctl(2) switch.
>
> The TCP single stream receiving performance increased from 3.6 Gbit/s to
> 9.4 Gbit/s. Measured
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 06:25:00PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff enables the TCP Large Receive Offloading feature for
> ix(4) interfaces. It also includes a default off sysctl(2) switch.
>
> The TCP single stream receiving performance increased from 3.6 Gbit/s to
> 9.4
I really do not think sysctl makes sense for this. We do not
create global knobs that affect network drivers like this. If
there is going to be a knob, it should be per-interface, via
ifconfig.
Additionally, I am *extremely sceptical this code works. If the sysctl
is changed, network
18 matches
Mail list logo
