On Mon, 9 May 2011 14:55:36 +0200
Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 12:44:54 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:29:01PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2011 12:44:54 +
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
ok then, why do some devices have 'outputs.dac' yet others have
'inputs.dac'? what is the difference to the user? which is more
correct?
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
I always thought that the idea behind the *ctl programs is to provide a
way to configure totally different things in a similar manner.
Therefore *ctl programs should behave as similarily as possible.
so where is your diff to
Hi.
Sviatoslav Chagaev 0x1392 () gmail ! com
I have absolutely no idea. I'm not an audio equipment manufacturer.
I have used many consoles ... digital and analogue ones ... live and
in studios.
I also have an electronics background - digital and analogue ... and
repaired many consoles.
I've
At the sake of running out of internet here's a little clarification ...
... this ...
- input channela
channela output -
- input channelb
channelb output -
- input channelc
channelc output -
- input channeld
channeld output -
- input groupA (ab)
groupA (ab) output -
- input groupB (cd)
groupB
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
* sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
* it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
output;
* hierarchical variable names yet
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
acam...@verlet.org wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Sviatoslav Chagaev
sviatoslav.chag...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Am I missing something?
$ sysctl | sort /tmp/sysctl_sorted
$ sysctl | cmp -s /tmp/sysctl_sorted /dev/stdin ||
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
* sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
* it's easier to find the variable
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:56:28PM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
* sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
* it's easier to find the variable
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Sviatoslav Chagaev
sviatoslav.chag...@gmail.com wrote:
* sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
* it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
output;
* hierarchical variable names yet unordered? doesn't make sense;
* this way mixerctl's
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:32:49AM +0300, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote:
* sorted output looks cleaner, prettier;
* it's easier to find the variable you're looking for in a sorted
output;
* hierarchical variable names yet unordered? doesn't make sense;
* this way mixerctl's behaviour will be
12 matches
Mail list logo
