Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-02-25 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:17:48PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > > currently

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-02-05 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 08:07:42PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > On Feb 05 17:35:46, o...@drijf.net wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 05:22:50PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > > > > On Feb 02 00:04:37, alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-02-05 Thread Jan Stary
On Feb 05 17:35:46, o...@drijf.net wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 05:22:50PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > > On Feb 02 00:04:37, alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > > > Are you running with any malloc flags? > > > > > > > >

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-02-05 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 05:22:50PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > On Feb 02 00:04:37, alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > > Are you running with any malloc flags? > > > > > > This bug report enabled me to find a bug that would pop up

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-02-05 Thread Jan Stary
On Feb 02 00:04:37, alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > Are you running with any malloc flags? > > > > This bug report enabled me to find a bug that would pop up if G mode > > is enabled. > > > > New diff below. New tests

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-02-01 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:00:36AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > Are you running with any malloc flags? > > This bug report enabled me to find a bug that would pop up if G mode > is enabled. > > New diff below. New tests appreciated. It passed a full regress run on amd64 with vm.malloc_conf

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:17:48PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > > > size. This

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-28 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > > size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very > > quick to check. >

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-28 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very > quick to check. > > Some programs allocate and deallocate larger allocations in a frantic >

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-25 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:25:25AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:42:47AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in >

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-22 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:42:47AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > > size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very > >

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-16 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very > quick to check. > > Some programs allocate and deallocate larger allocations in a

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-13 Thread Leo Unglaub
Hey, On 1/9/22 14:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote: currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very quick to check. Some programs allocate and deallocate larger allocations in a frantic way. Accodomate those

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-13 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hi Otto, * Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very > quick to check. > > Some programs allocate and deallocate larger allocations in a frantic > way. Accodomate

Re: request for testing: malloc and large allocations

2022-01-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/01/09 14:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > currently malloc does cache a number of free'ed regions up to 128k in > size. This cache is indexed by size (in # of pages), so it is very > quick to check. > > Some programs allocate and deallocate larger allocations in a frantic > way. Accodomate