> On 20 Nov 2015, at 11:23 PM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:40PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
>>
>> perhaps a better check is to see whether there are pending packets
>> on the send
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:27:05PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 20 Nov 2015, at 11:23 PM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:40PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
> >>
> >> perhaps a
On 20.11.2015. 6:36, David Gwynne wrote:
> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
>
> perhaps a better check is to see whether there are pending packets
> on the send queue?
>
> i could also argue we dont need the check at all, but this is less
> of a semantic change.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:40PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
>
> perhaps a better check is to see whether there are pending packets
> on the send queue?
>
> i could also argue we dont need the check at all, but this is less
> of
> On 20 Nov 2015, at 8:18 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On 20/11/15(Fri) 15:36, David Gwynne wrote:
>> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
>
> As discussed earlier, I'd still love to have a document (manpage?)
> describing these flags so we can
On 20.11.2015. 13:26, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 20.11.2015. 6:36, David Gwynne wrote:
>> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
>>
>> perhaps a better check is to see whether there are pending packets
>> on the send queue?
>>
>> i could also argue we dont need the check
On 20/11/15(Fri) 15:36, David Gwynne wrote:
> IFF_OACTIVE means the hardware ring is full, not if it is busy.
As discussed earlier, I'd still love to have a document (manpage?)
describing these flags so we can agree on when to use them.
> perhaps a better check is to see whether there are
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:27:05PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > > On 20 Nov 2015, at 11:23 PM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:40PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > >>