On 09:42:32, 9.03.16, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> On 22:47:08, 8.03.16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > > p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it.
> >
> > Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted
> > rules when we read
On 22:47:08, 8.03.16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it.
>
> Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted
> rules when we read code is that comments are always lying. So I doubt
> anyone
On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it.
Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted
rules when we read code is that comments are always lying. So I doubt
anyone will object fixing them.
Could you send a single diff
