gwes wrote:
>
>
> On 02/08/19 15:35, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >
> > I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
> > scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
> >
> > ok?
> >
> >
> > --- scan_ffs.8.~1.16.~ Mon Mar 24 00:28:46 2008
> > +++ scan_ffs.8 Fri Feb 8 21:31
On 02/08/19 15:35, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
ok?
--- scan_ffs.8.~1.16.~ Mon Mar 24 00:28:46 2008
+++ scan_ffs.8 Fri Feb 8 21:31:10 2019
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ you out of a jam when they
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08 2019, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I think it's fair to give the user a chance t
On Fri, Feb 08 2019, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
>> > scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
>> >
>> > ok?
>> >
>>
>> h
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
> > scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
> >
> > ok?
> >
>
> hi.
>
> i'm not sure if it's a bug, but it sure seems rele
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:35:35PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
> I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
> scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
>
> ok?
>
hi.
i'm not sure if it's a bug, but it sure seems relevant. i would be
tempted to be much more upfront
I think it's fair to give the user a chance to understand why
scan_ffs(8) won't help in this case.
ok?
--- scan_ffs.8.~1.16.~ Mon Mar 24 00:28:46 2008
+++ scan_ffs.8 Fri Feb 8 21:31:10 2019
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ you out of a jam when they happen.
.Sh SEE ALSO
.Xr disklabel 8
.Sh BUGS
-It
