[tesseract-ocr] Re: issue with simple reading of numbers 9 and 8

It has a hard time with the letter Q for some reason now. Thanks for your help, it seems just using the included traineddata is more accurate than just the font, don't know why that is.

Re: [tesseract-ocr] Re: issue with simple reading of numbers 9 and 8

Thanks for letting me know. No I haven't had a chance. I will try 4.0 although I have never manually dealt with tesseract. I've been using programs for 3.x that trained and made box files automatically. On Apr 24, 2017 12:43 AM, "ShreeDevi Kumar" wrote: > James, > > Were

Re: [tesseract-ocr] Re: issue with simple reading of numbers 9 and 8

James, Were you able to get this to work for you with 3.04/3.05? I get accurate results using Tesseract 4.0 alpha, though it takes longer with --oem 1 than --oem 0. ./troublewith98-300.jpg Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine v4.00.00alpha-385-gab41465 with Leptonica real0m1.203s user

Re: [tesseract-ocr] Re: issue with simple reading of numbers 9 and 8

Try training using more samples of 8, 9, B etc. What results do you get with the provided eng.traineddata? Are they better or worse? Have you tried changing DPI of image to 300? - excuse the brevity, sent from mobile On 22-Apr-2017 10:29 PM, "James Abney" wrote: > Oh yes

Re: [tesseract-ocr] Re: issue with simple reading of numbers 9 and 8

Oh yes I guess I forgot to include that information, I did train using only that font and with the same size font. I am on windows 7 and I used 3.05 to train, although the .net wrapper i use is 3.04. I don't see how it has difficulty with the 9 and 8, seems very odd. On Friday, April 21, 2017

Re: [tesseract-ocr] Re: issue with simple reading of numbers 9 and 8

Which version of Tesseract. Which o/s? If all your text is in tungsten-semibold, have you tried training with just that font? - excuse the brevity, sent from mobile On 22-Apr-2017 12:50 AM, "James Abney" wrote: The font is tungsten semibold On Friday, April 21, 2017 at