I'm not sure if user-words and/or whitelist characters are supported by
LSTMs engines (versions>= 4.00) Last news I had about this it was only
suported on legacy engines (v3.x) with the --oem 0 option. Maybe someone
can prove correct me if I'm wrong?
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 11:38:46 AM
Samuel,
Do the user-words work as expected after making this change?
Which version of tesseract are you using?
ShreeDevi
भजन - कीर्तन - आरती @ http://bhajans.ramparivar.com
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Samuel backus
I had to recompile tesseract after updating dict.h and dict.cpp for this
change to take effect.
On Monday, October 3, 2011 at 3:20:05 AM UTC-4, Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
>
> Dne 2.10.2011 1:36, pi�e B.J.:
> > I ran into this problem recently. Here is the solution (I'm using
> > Tesseract
Perhaps this is just a misunderstanding or bad documentation. The
--print-parameters dump shows the input parameters, and the user_words_file
/ user_patterns_file parameters, if they're not set on the command line,
will always be empty.
The actual file name that gets loaded gets computed on
Thanks for this clarification.
Stef
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015 20:30:51 UTC+2 schrieb Tom Morris:
>
> Perhaps this is just a misunderstanding or bad documentation. The
> --print-parameters dump shows the input parameters, and the user_words_file
> / user_patterns_file parameters, if
Tom,
I wasn't aware of the new possiblity to specify user words on the command
line. Instead I used the config file method with the following command
lines and outputs:
tesseract.exe --version
tesseract 3.05.00dev
leptonica-1.72
libgif 4.1.6(?) : libjpeg 8d (libjpeg-turbo 1.3.1) : libpng
Hi Stef,
They have indeed no effect as far as I have found. The idea is great, but
unfortunately it just does not seem to work.
I have found no working demonstrations of it after looking for quite an
amount of time.
We have instead found a strong ambiguous character set combined with
On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 9:29:39 AM UTC-4, Stef wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use user wordlists with the bazaar config but it seems to
> have no effect on the OCR result in my case. Therefore I printed the
> current parameters to verify whether the user-words list is used. This
> confirmed
8 matches
Mail list logo
