Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-04-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 11:56 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:18 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 08:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > > > broken on certain printers. As a

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-03-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 2:53 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > IMHO Stephen meant it as driverless 'driver' or IPP everywhere enabled > printer, since 'generic IPP driver' does not exist. OK. > > > > What supports IPP Everywhere out of the box? > > > > Any computer running CUPS 1.5 or later > I beg

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-03-11 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:56 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > "Work" is defined as the output from the device matching a preview > shown on the GNOME print preview display. (Note that non-ridiculous > differences in color

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-02-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I just realized I only responded to Zdenek the other day. Re-sending my response now. On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:13 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi, > > comments are in the text: > > On 2/11/19 9:17 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Chris Murphy > > wrote: > >> On

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-02-11 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
On 2/11/19 3:17 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: Sorry that it's taken me so long to get back to this. I think the feedback on this has been mostly positive on the Beta criteria, but

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-02-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Sorry that it's taken me so long to get back to this. > > > > I think the feedback on this has been mostly positive on the Beta > > criteria, but I'd like to tweak the

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-02-11 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:18 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 08:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > > > broken on certain printers. As

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-02-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:18 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 08:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > > broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became > > apparent that there was no

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-11-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 08:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became > apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which > seems like an

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was >> broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became >> apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which >> seems like an

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Peter Robinson
> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became > apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which > seems like an oversight. > > I discussed this briefly with Matthias Clasen this

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 7:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:33 AM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for > Fedora 30+: > > > * Printing must work

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:33 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora > > 30+: > > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > > "Work" is

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Ben Cotton
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:33 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > "Work" is defined as the output from the device matching a preview > shown on the

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:40 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora > 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > > and this to Final for Fedora 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one

Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which seems like an oversight. I discussed this briefly with Matthias Clasen this morning and

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2018-09-20 Thread Petr Ĺ abata
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:33:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became > apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which > seems like an