On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 06:57 +, Joachim Frieben wrote:
> Unfortunately, I still ignore the current policy for reopening a
> closed bug, in particular those resolved as ERRATA. The documentation
> page "BugStatusWorkFlow" should get really amended in this respect.
To be totally honest, that page
Unfortunately, I still ignore the current policy for reopening a closed bug, in
particular those resolved as ERRATA. The documentation page "BugStatusWorkFlow"
should get really amended in this respect.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 18:40 +, Joachim Frieben wrote:
> The page BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow displays the work flow which
> applies to a Fedora bug. However, no policy is given about reopening
> a closed bug. At the bottom of the page, the reader is referred to "A
> Bug's Life Cycle" for furth
The page BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow displays the work flow which applies to a
Fedora bug. However, no policy is given about reopening a closed bug. At the
bottom of the page, the reader is referred to "A Bug's Life Cycle" for further
information. Here, we read
"CLOSED
This bug fix has been r
