Re: [Request To Review] Testcases for dnf modular
> Dear Sumantro, > > Did you talk to DNF QE team? I suggest you coordinate your work with Karel > Srot from DNF > QE team. There is a tool to test DNF and I know Karel already has a good set > of tests > which covers Modular side of DNF [1], just missing some user stories. We're also trying to keep track of the places where automated testing happens as part of the Fedora module developer's guide at https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/development/building-modules/testing.html I think the key item we have there that hasn't been mentioned in the thread yet is your own automated tests at https://github.com/fedora-modularity/compose-tests Cheers, Nick. P.S. It's entirely plausible that we're missing some aspects of the automated testing setup for the modular server builds, so issue reports and PRs to correct omissions at https://pagure.io/modularity are most welcome. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 26 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing: Age URL 220 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1bf5a0ce01 python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-2.fc26 159 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2522df3526 nodejs-brace-expansion-1.1.7-1.fc26 114 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1c053de325 memcached-1.4.39-1.fc26 110 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ccb5c8d1e7 docker-distribution-2.6.2-1.git48294d9.fc26 39 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6e6f4f95e6 ruby-2.4.2-84.fc26 25 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6bff3cf26c suricata-3.2.4-1.fc26 19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b52f851dea calamares-3.1.7-1.fc26 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45044b6b33 hostapd-2.6-6.fc26 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fa89dbf50d php-PHPMailer-5.2.26-1.fc26 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-357fa6205d ImageMagick-6.9.9.22-1.fc26 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-31519ecf40 knot-resolver-1.5.0-1.fc26 knot-2.6.1-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ea72793352 fedpkg-1.30-4.fc26 rpkg-1.51-2.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1560290881 roundcubemail-1.3.3-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-69e06543c1 perl-Net-Ping-External-0.15-11.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3915878e18 ldns-1.7.0-4.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1f1fdab532 postgresql-9.6.6-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f87ce166c5 chromium-62.0.3202.89-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5f358346f5 firefox-57.0-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-60c61b6e79 python-copr-1.84-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ebee750022 backintime-1.1.24-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1f52998c8b konversation-1.7.3-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-13f0fd3028 jbig2dec-0.14-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dbec196dd8 openssl-1.1.0g-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7f30914972 compat-openssl10-1.0.2m-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4d5618a962 webkitgtk4-2.18.3-1.fc26 The following Fedora 26 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 43 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-621a9b4828 iproute-4.13.0-1.fc26 34 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8e91b32f31 python3-3.6.3-2.fc26 32 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19f599ecd6 chrony-3.2-1.fc26 21 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-04dc465e5b ModemManager-1.6.10-1.fc26 19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-34b7ce4fee libappstream-glib-0.7.3-1.fc26 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-861946053e python-productmd-1.9-1.fc26 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2727dc1ce8 iio-sensor-proxy-2.4-1.fc26 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f10b769a7e pcre2-10.23-10.fc26 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-349fb51b4d pungi-4.1.20-1.fc26 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-da5d015449 pcre-8.41-3.fc26 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ad679ebc50 menu-cache-1.1.0-1.fc26 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-24caef8611 gnome-online-accounts-3.24.4-3.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5f358346f5 firefox-57.0-1.fc26 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4a095800d2 gnutls-3.5.16-2.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-928612cbf8 qt5-qtbase-5.9.2-5.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4d5618a962 webkitgtk4-2.18.3-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7f30914972 compat-openssl10-1.0.2m-1.fc26 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dbec196dd8 openssl-1.1.0g-1.fc26 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 26 updates-testing R-curl-3.0-1.fc26 babl-0.1.36-1.fc26 bind-9.11.1-3.P3.fc26 borgbackup-1.1.2-1.fc26 caja-1.18.5-1.fc26 cinnamon-3.6.2-1.fc26 cinnamon-control-center-3.6.2-2.fc26 cinnamon-desktop-3.6.2-3.fc26 cinnamon-screensaver-3.6.1-1.fc26 cinnamon-translations-3.6.2-1.fc26 cjs-3.6.1-1.fc26 clevis-8-1.fc26 clufter-0.77.0-1.fc26 compat-openssl10-1.0.2m-1.fc26 cri-o-1.0.4-1.git4aceede.fc26 ghc-cond-0.4.1.1-1.fc26 ghc-htoml-1.0.0.3-1.fc26 ghc-quickcheck-io-0.2.0-1.fc26 ghc-vector-algorithms-0.7.
Fedora-Modular 27-20171114.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 18/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171113.n.1): ID: 169977 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169977 ID: 169991 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169991 ID: 169997 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169997 ID: 16 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/16 ID: 170004 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170004 ID: 170005 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170005 ID: 170041 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170041 ID: 170042 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170042 ID: 170043 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170043 ID: 170044 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170044 ID: 170046 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170046 ID: 170047 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170047 ID: 170048 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170048 ID: 170057 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170057 ID: 170058 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170058 ID: 170059 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170059 ID: 170063 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170063 ID: 170064 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170064 ID: 170069 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170069 ID: 170082 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170082 ID: 170083 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170083 ID: 170086 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170086 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/94 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in 27-20171113.n.1): ID: 169989 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169989 ID: 169994 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169994 Passed openQA tests: 68/94 (x86_64), 15/19 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in 27-20171113.n.1): ID: 169979 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169979 ID: 170027 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170027 ID: 170056 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170056 ID: 170073 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170073 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.06 to 0.17 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169760#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169975#downloads Installed system changes in test i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.35 to 0.16 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169783#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169998#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: System load changed from 0.18 to 0.07 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169836#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170051#downloads Installed system changes in test i386 universal install_package_set_kde: System load changed from 0.18 to 0.06 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169856#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170071#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 25 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing: Age URL 321 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb exim-4.87.1-1.fc25 220 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25 159 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5d7498559f nodejs-brace-expansion-1.1.7-1.fc25 113 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-99c0118c0c memcached-1.4.39-1.fc25 110 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2232fe97b4 docker-distribution-2.6.2-1.git48294d9.fc25 31 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6967efb3f0 thunderbird-52.4.0-2.fc25 25 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7089c6e789 suricata-3.2.4-1.fc25 17 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-51f49ebbce apr-1.6.3-1.fc25 17 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f563b201ba apr-util-1.5.4-4.fc25 17 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45ed341e61 httpd-2.4.29-1.fc25 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ab57a100f3 rpm-4.13.0.2-1.fc25 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cfb950d8f4 hostapd-2.6-6.fc25 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-803a99828d php-PHPMailer-5.2.26-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f5ad4107cc fedpkg-1.30-4.fc25 rpkg-1.51-2.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c7514691cb perl-Net-Ping-External-0.15-11.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6e67e4e45b poppler-0.45.0-10.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0188f21212 postgresql-9.5.10-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-481e4f6f8c ldns-1.6.17-22.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5bbb657c5 chromium-62.0.3202.89-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2391f0551d firefox-57.0-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1a9068594d python-copr-1.84-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8016cc0bd0 backintime-1.1.24-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f58db0 konversation-1.7.3-1.fc25 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-55a3247cfd openssl-1.0.2m-1.fc25 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-077334783e webkitgtk4-2.18.3-1.fc25 The following Fedora 25 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 164 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-613a72e282 lorax-25.22-1.fc25 43 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3fc5429e7e iproute-4.12.0-1.fc25 31 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6967efb3f0 thunderbird-52.4.0-2.fc25 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b89e9f62d8 bind99-9.9.10-3.P3.fc25 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b9a00d98e5 python-productmd-1.9-1.fc25 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dbf347055a hwdata-0.306-1.fc25 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ab57a100f3 rpm-4.13.0.2-1.fc25 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e64b02d1b1 pcre2-10.23-10.fc25 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-65b10e63d5 pungi-4.1.20-1.fc25 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ec5efbcfc6 pcre-8.41-3.fc25 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e91585cd60 ethtool-4.13-1.fc25 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-560cebc111 menu-cache-1.1.0-1.fc25 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a7f307017b python-lxml-4.1.1-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e82231f2c7 libglvnd-1.0.0-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2391f0551d firefox-57.0-1.fc25 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6e67e4e45b poppler-0.45.0-10.fc25 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-077334783e webkitgtk4-2.18.3-1.fc25 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-55a3247cfd openssl-1.0.2m-1.fc25 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 25 updates-testing bind-9.10.5-3.P3.fc25 caja-1.18.5-1.fc25 haxe-3.4.4-1.fc25 impallari-raleway-fonts-3.0-2.git20161116.6c67ab1.fc25 lighttpd-1.4.48-1.fc25 lis-2.0.3-2.fc25 mediawriter-4.1.1-1.fc25 openssl-1.0.2m-1.fc25 perl-Finance-Quote-1.47-1.fc25 perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.11-1.fc25 perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.07-1.fc25 perl-Shipwright-2.4.42-1.fc25 pluma-1.18.3-1.fc25 pysnmp-4.4.2-1.fc25 python-msrest-0.4.18-1.fc25 python-msrestazure-0.4.16-1.fc25 python-openidc-client-0.4.0-1.20171113git54dee6e.fc25 python-stem-1.6.0-1.fc25 sway-0.15.0-2.fc25 timeline-1.16.0-1.fc25 webkitg
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171114.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171113.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171114.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker armhfp Path: Server/armhfp/images/Fedora-Modular-Container-Base-27_Modular-20171114.n.0.armhfp.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 27 Retrospective is live!
The Retrospective page for Fedora 27 QA is now up:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_QA_Retrospective
We use the retrospective page to track things that went well and things
that didn't go so well during the Fedora 27 validation process, and for
tracking ideas we have but don't have time to act on during the rush of
doing validation (that's the wishlist).
Please, add any feedback you have of this type to the retrospective
page! There are instructions on the page for adding feedback.
All feedback is useful, and once 27 retrospections is done, we'll take a
look at all the items on the page and come up with specific
recommendations for addressing them which we'll file as pagure issues and
work on in the time before Fedora 28 validation starts up. We've been
doing this for a while now and it's turned out to be a great way to keep
constantly improving our processes.
You can look at the previous pages for inspiration:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:QA_Retrospective
And here's an old list of leading questions to prompt
feedback:
1. Were you able to participate in any Fedora 27 Alpha, Beta or
Final test runs?
2. What worked well, what prevented you from participating, were
instructions clear?
3. What worked (or didn't work) well about Fedora Test Days this
release?
4. Are you a maintainer, why do you think your critpath updates
haven't been tested? What could you do to encourage more
testing of your proposed updates?
5. Did you escalate any bugs for consideration as
{Alpha,Beta,Final} release Blockers? Why not? Was the process
well documented and did it make sense?
6. Did you attend or contribute to any Fedora blocker meetings?
Why not? What did you like, dislike? What prevented you from
participating?
7. Did you find any of the release criteria changes or validation
test extensions particularly useful or problematic?
8. Can you think of any obviously important areas we are not
currently covering the validation tests and criteria?
Thanks
//sumantrom
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > It seems to save a few hundred MB off the workstation boot, probably closer > to the size for the old server boot. Fortunately, I don't (yet) have a > bandwidth cap so it's more a matter of what I've been used to using being > changed. :) All the netinstalls are based on the exact same boot image, the only difference should be the product image file that does a bit of installer UI customization for defaults and stuff, including what package set (Software Selection default button) is chosen. So I'd expect there to be maybe a 1MB difference between them. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 18:16 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 16:51 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > > > Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos > > > > available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've > > > > overlooked something obvious. > > > > However, it is in fact correct that the non-modular Server images for > > F27 aren't really considered a part of the release. They were produced > > for all nightly and candidate composes, including the final release, > > but I believe the plan is not to include them in the modified compose > > that is actually sent out to mirrors as the release, and not to promote > > them in any way. > > > > If you know how to get them from the RC compose you can of course still > > go ahead and use them...but Modular Server is the only supported Server > > edition for F27, AIUI. > > That's a bit of a pity for those liking to do minimal installs. > Are there going to be any available net installs that, by default, install > the standard Fedore repos instead of the modular server ones? Sure. The Workstation and Everything netinst images. The Everything netinst is in fact produced (and considered release blocking) more or less specifically for this purpose. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
+1 I would also like to do a minimal install if possible. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:39:15PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > >> go ahead and use them...but Modular Server is the only supported Server > >> edition for F27, AIUI. > > > > That's a bit of a pity for those liking to do minimal installs. > > Are there going to be any available net installs that, by default, install > > the standard Fedore repos instead of the modular server ones? > > I would be surprised if I'm the only one who likes to install that way. > > Obviously, there are workarounds, but it would be nice if something similar > > was available by default. > > > > Thanks, as always. > > Minimal installs haven't ever been Fedora Server though. But maybe you > want a minimal install and then group install server? Ok. I've been, for many releases, chosing the server netboot and gotten minimal install from its software selection. This is the first time it's given me different repos. As mentioned, I can use the workstation boot, I just prefer downloading some kind of net install. I'll probably just go to using the workstation from now on. Heh, sounds like I'm pouting, saying that in a sulky voice. > > Anyway, with the existing getfedora.org, at the very bottom is and > option, Alternative Downloads. That takes you here: > > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/ > > If you download Everything, it's a netinstaller that includes a > Software Selection option and in there is a minimal install as well as > Fedora Custom OS, and the F27 version has the same interface and > options. It seems to save a few hundred MB off the workstation boot, probably closer to the size for the old server boot. Fortunately, I don't (yet) have a bandwidth cap so it's more a matter of what I've been used to using being changed. :) Thanks to both Chris and Adam for clarifications. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 16:51 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: >> > >> > > Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos >> > > available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've >> > > overlooked something obvious. >> > >> >> However, it is in fact correct that the non-modular Server images for >> F27 aren't really considered a part of the release. They were produced >> for all nightly and candidate composes, including the final release, >> but I believe the plan is not to include them in the modified compose >> that is actually sent out to mirrors as the release, and not to promote >> them in any way. >> >> If you know how to get them from the RC compose you can of course still >> go ahead and use them...but Modular Server is the only supported Server >> edition for F27, AIUI. > > That's a bit of a pity for those liking to do minimal installs. > Are there going to be any available net installs that, by default, install > the standard Fedore repos instead of the modular server ones? > I would be surprised if I'm the only one who likes to install that way. > Obviously, there are workarounds, but it would be nice if something similar > was available by default. > > Thanks, as always. Minimal installs haven't ever been Fedora Server though. But maybe you want a minimal install and then group install server? Anyway, with the existing getfedora.org, at the very bottom is and option, Alternative Downloads. That takes you here: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/ If you download Everything, it's a netinstaller that includes a Software Selection option and in there is a minimal install as well as Fedora Custom OS, and the F27 version has the same interface and options. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:16:50PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 16:51 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > > > Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos > > > > available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've > > > > overlooked something obvious. > > > > > > > However, it is in fact correct that the non-modular Server images for > > F27 aren't really considered a part of the release. They were produced > > for all nightly and candidate composes, including the final release, > > but I believe the plan is not to include them in the modified compose > > that is actually sent out to mirrors as the release, and not to promote > > them in any way. > > > > That's a bit of a pity for those liking to do minimal installs. > Are there going to be any available net installs that, by default, install > the standard Fedore repos instead of the modular server ones? > I would be surprised if I'm the only one who likes to install that way. Ok, to update myself, I see that there is a 500 MB Workstation boot (going by the nightlies) which is only a bit bigger than the server boot, and that it offers the minimal install. So, that will do, enabling me to do my usual minimal install and get the normal Fedora repos. Thanks. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 16:51 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos > > > available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've > > > overlooked something obvious. > > > > However, it is in fact correct that the non-modular Server images for > F27 aren't really considered a part of the release. They were produced > for all nightly and candidate composes, including the final release, > but I believe the plan is not to include them in the modified compose > that is actually sent out to mirrors as the release, and not to promote > them in any way. > > If you know how to get them from the RC compose you can of course still > go ahead and use them...but Modular Server is the only supported Server > edition for F27, AIUI. That's a bit of a pity for those liking to do minimal installs. Are there going to be any available net installs that, by default, install the standard Fedore repos instead of the modular server ones? I would be surprised if I'm the only one who likes to install that way. Obviously, there are workarounds, but it would be nice if something similar was available by default. Thanks, as always. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
2017-11-13 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - Minutes
== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting == Meeting started by adamw at 16:01:43 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-11-13/fedora-qa.2017-11-13-16.01.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:01:52) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:06:57) * "adamw to create RC-1.6 validation event, investigate why automatic creation failed" - this is done, and the automatic creation failed because PDC didn't send out a fedmsg for the compose (adamw, 16:07:24) * "sumantro to complete the module test cases, ask for help if needed" - sumantro has completed a draft, it's up for review on test@ (adamw, 16:10:17) * Fedora 27 wrap-up (adamw, 16:12:38) * Fedora 27 was signed off on Thursday, will release tomorrow (adamw, 16:14:01) * Fedora Modular Server 27 Beta was signed off the same day and will release tomorrow as well; we are still working towards Final for Modular Server (adamw, 16:14:37) * ACTION: sumantro to set up Retrospective page for Fedora 27, send out requests for feedback (adamw, 16:16:28) * ACTION: adamw and kparal to update common bugs page (adamw, 16:19:36) * ACTION: adamw to create F29 blocker trackers (adamw, 16:19:44) * ACTION: adamw to grant sumantro necessary powers to create milestones in pagure (adamw, 16:21:50) * ACTION: sumantro to create f28 milestones in pagure (and close old tickets/milestones as appropriate) (adamw, 16:22:04) * Fedora Modular Server 27 GA test planning (adamw, 16:28:49) * Modular Server GA is planned for 2018-01-09, but may move up (adamw, 16:32:48) * the release validation process has been updated to create events for 27 modular composes, so we should get normal wiki validation pages for future composes (adamw, 16:36:03) * Fedora 28 planning (adamw, 16:41:27) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/526 --> Kernel 4.14 Test Day on 2017-11-30 , I will go ahead and co-ordinate with jforbes (sumantro, 16:42:39) * ACTION: sumantro to act as co-ordinator for F28 test day cycle (adamw, 16:44:18) * Kernel 4.14 Test Day will be on 2017-11-30 , sumantro and jforbes are organizing, see https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/526 (adamw, 16:44:46) * there is some intent to reconcile the modular and non-modular compose processes for F28, but it is not yet done. (adamw, 16:48:49) * Rawhide compose gating will likely start during the F28 cycle (adamw, 16:52:09) * next onboarding call and Fedora 102 classroom session planned for December (adamw, 16:57:30) * Open floor (adamw, 16:58:21) * ACTION: coremodule to put together Heroes of Fedora posts for F27 cycle (adamw, 17:01:17) Meeting ended at 17:08:08 UTC. Action Items * sumantro to set up Retrospective page for Fedora 27, send out requests for feedback * adamw and kparal to update common bugs page * adamw to create F29 blocker trackers * adamw to grant sumantro necessary powers to create milestones in pagure * sumantro to create f28 milestones in pagure (and close old tickets/milestones as appropriate) * sumantro to act as co-ordinator for F28 test day cycle * coremodule to put together Heroes of Fedora posts for F27 cycle Action Items, by person --- * adamw * adamw and kparal to update common bugs page * adamw to create F29 blocker trackers * adamw to grant sumantro necessary powers to create milestones in pagure * coremodule * coremodule to put together Heroes of Fedora posts for F27 cycle * sumantro * sumantro to set up Retrospective page for Fedora 27, send out requests for feedback * adamw to grant sumantro necessary powers to create milestones in pagure * sumantro to create f28 milestones in pagure (and close old tickets/milestones as appropriate) * sumantro to act as co-ordinator for F28 test day cycle * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * adamw (107) * sumantro (31) * sgallagh (19) * coremodule (8) * zodbot (5) * langdon (3) * dominicpg (3) * pschindl (2) * siddharthvipul1[ (1) * jforbes (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 16:51 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > > > > However, the only repos available are the modular server repos. In > > contrast, the other install has the standard fedora repos that were > > installed, as they've always been, during a standard install. > > > > Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos > > available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've > > overlooked something obvious. > > And, it seems this may just be on the nightlies page. Looking at > mirrors.kernel.org in F27-Beta, it seems the normal server netinstall iso > is available. If that's the case, everything's fine as far as I'm > concerned. The nightlies code basically treats non-modular and modular 27 composes as interchangeable: it'll display whichever came most recently. I could change this, but I haven't bothered. However, it is in fact correct that the non-modular Server images for F27 aren't really considered a part of the release. They were produced for all nightly and candidate composes, including the final release, but I believe the plan is not to include them in the modified compose that is actually sent out to mirrors as the release, and not to promote them in any way. If you know how to get them from the RC compose you can of course still go ahead and use them...but Modular Server is the only supported Server edition for F27, AIUI. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Server downloads
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > However, the only repos available are the modular server repos. In > contrast, the other install has the standard fedora repos that were > installed, as they've always been, during a standard install. > > Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos > available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've > overlooked something obvious. And, it seems this may just be on the nightlies page. Looking at mirrors.kernel.org in F27-Beta, it seems the normal server netinstall iso is available. If that's the case, everything's fine as far as I'm concerned. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Server downloads
I'm hoping that I'm overlooking something here. I installed Fedora-27 from a nightly a few weeks ago. I downloaded a server boot only, installed minimal, and everything was normal. Today, doing a VirtualBox install, all I saw available was the modular server. So I used that, and again chose minimal. However, the only repos available are the modular server repos. In contrast, the other install has the standard fedora repos that were installed, as they've always been, during a standard install. Is there now only going to be a modular server with modular server repos available? This seems a regression to me, but I'm suspecting that I've overlooked something obvious. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes
___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Modular 27-20171113.n.1 compose check report
Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 21/94 (x86_64), 5/19 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171113.n.0): ID: 169764 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169764 ID: 169812 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169812 ID: 169841 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169841 ID: 169858 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169858 Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171113.n.0): ID: 169762 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169762 ID: 169776 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169776 ID: 169782 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169782 ID: 169784 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169784 ID: 169789 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169789 ID: 169790 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169790 ID: 169826 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169826 ID: 169827 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169827 ID: 169828 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169828 ID: 169829 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169829 ID: 169831 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169831 ID: 169832 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169832 ID: 169833 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169833 ID: 169842 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169842 ID: 169843 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169843 ID: 169844 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169844 ID: 169848 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169848 ID: 169849 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169849 ID: 169854 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169854 ID: 169867 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169867 ID: 169868 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169868 ID: 169871 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169871 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/94 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in 27-20171113.n.0): ID: 169774 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169774 ID: 169779 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169779 Passed openQA tests: 65/94 (x86_64), 14/19 (i386) Installed system changes in test i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.05 to 0.35 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169458#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169783#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal: System load changed from 0.22 to 0.11 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169470#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169795#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: System load changed from 0.05 to 0.18 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169511#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169836#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Request To Review] Testcases for dnf modular
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 13:21 +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:38 PM Sumantro Mukherjee > wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > > Now that we have the F27 Modular Server Beta, It will be great to have the > > test cases. > > I've started writing them, I would like to have the feedback and thoughts > > on them. > > I have mostly used dnf module --help as a base to derive the these. If > > something is > > missing, I would love to draft them too, just let me know. > > > > [1] Listing all modules: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/FMS_module_list > > > Looks good, though we should probably add a set of modules that *must* be > enabled/disabled on the default install. It doesn't need to address all > possible modules in the list, but we should have a minimum set that must be > correct. I'd see that as a separate test. Testing the module list functionality is one thing, defining and checking a set of minimum content for the default Server install is another... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnf system upgrade, grub2
On Sat, 2017-11-11 at 16:08 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Chris Murphy composed on 2017-11-11 13:39 (UTC-0700): > > > Felix Miata wrote: > > > Must be more than one problem with grub dependencies. Every one of my > > > (BIOS/MBR-only) F26 to F27 upgrades added grub packages, without any > > > complaints, > > > even though no F26 grub* rpms were installed, needed or wanted. :-( > > That is expected because grub2 is one of the packages found in the > > Fedora Workstation group, and a system upgrade is does distrosync by > > default. One of the upgrade requirements for the various "products" in > > Fedora is that the upgraded system is the same as an installation of > > Fedora Workstation. > > Sounds even more broken, as all I did in both is: > > dnf upgrade --releasever=27 > > That was after attempted versionlocking, but apparently there's no way to lock > out unwanted packages with dnf anything like there is in Debian or Mageia > (unintuitive, manually edited configfile) and openSUSE (simple: zypper al > ). lmgtfy: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/403181/how-to-pin-a-package-in-dnf-fedora -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171113.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171113.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171113.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker armhfp Path: Server/armhfp/images/Fedora-Modular-Container-Base-27_Modular-20171113.n.0.armhfp.tar.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Request To Review] Testcases for dnf modular
Dear Sumantro, Did you talk to DNF QE team? I suggest you coordinate your work with Karel Srot from DNF QE team. There is a tool to test DNF and I know Karel already has a good set of tests which covers Modular side of DNF [1], just missing some user stories. There is also a regular DNF Devs and DNF QE mtg, where we discuss all around DNF QA and particularly Modular DNF, and if you want to contribute you are welcome to join, just please ping Karel all about it. Also please mind we have a modular DNF BZ tracker [2]. [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/tree/modularity [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478068 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20171113.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 21/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171112.n.0): ID: 169607 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169607 ID: 169718 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169718 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171112.n.0): ID: 169608 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169608 ID: 169614 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169614 ID: 169615 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169615 ID: 169616 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169616 ID: 169618 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169618 ID: 169627 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169627 ID: 169630 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169630 ID: 169643 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169643 ID: 169644 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169644 ID: 169690 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169690 ID: 169691 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169691 ID: 169692 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169692 ID: 169693 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169693 ID: 169695 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169695 ID: 169696 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169696 ID: 169697 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169697 ID: 169708 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169708 ID: 169712 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169712 ID: 169713 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169713 ID: 169714 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169714 Soft failed openQA tests: 4/128 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20171112.n.0): ID: 169633 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169633 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20171112.n.0): ID: 169632 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169632 ID: 169706 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169706 ID: 169707 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169707 Passed openQA tests: 90/128 (x86_64) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20171112.n.0): ID: 169631 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169631 Skipped openQA tests: 11 of 130 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.27 to 0.13 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169192#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169590#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.20 to 0.06 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169196#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169594#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.01 to 0.18 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169214#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169612#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: dnfdaemon.service System load changed from 0.84 to 1.09 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/169234#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test
Re: [Request To Review] Testcases for dnf modular
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:38 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey All, > > Now that we have the F27 Modular Server Beta, It will be great to have the > test cases. > I've started writing them, I would like to have the feedback and thoughts > on them. > I have mostly used dnf module --help as a base to derive the these. If > something is > missing, I would love to draft them too, just let me know. > > [1] Listing all modules: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/FMS_module_list Looks good, though we should probably add a set of modules that *must* be enabled/disabled on the default install. It doesn't need to address all possible modules in the list, but we should have a minimum set that must be correct. > > [2] Enabling & Disabling modules: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/FMS_enable_disable_module This test doesn't actually validate that the enable/disable correctly happened. At minimum, the results should be tested by repeating [1] and confirming that the values have changed. At best, we should have a set of packages known to install or fail to install that we use to prove the state. > > [3] Install & Update : > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/dnf_install_remove_update_module This page looks reasonable, but there are numerous typographical errors (including some in the commands) that should be corrected. It should also add a test for switching streams (e.g. verify that one can install nodejs-8 and then switch it to nodejs-6). > > [4] Module Info : > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/dnf_module_info > > This set of test cases needs to have a set of success conditions defined. "It displays some text" isn't good enough for blocker criteria. > > Thanks > //sumantro > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
