The following Fedora 31 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1543eae191
clamav-0.101.5-1.fc31
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3d5f61419f
milkytracker-1.02.00-5.fc31
4
On 12/1/19 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2019-11-30 at 20:06 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Kind of.
I just put together the notebook I will be using when F32 ships. It is
a Lenovo X140e, 8GB memory, and a 500GB SSD.
It was an EDU series and I *THINK* I have the bios set right.
On 12/1/19 9:26 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-01 09:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Kind of.
I just put together the notebook I will be using when F32 ships. It is a
Lenovo X140e, 8GB memory, and a 500GB SSD.
It was an EDU series and I *THINK* I have the bios set right. Defaulting to
On Sat, 2019-11-30 at 20:06 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Kind of.
>
> I just put together the notebook I will be using when F32 ships. It is
> a Lenovo X140e, 8GB memory, and a 500GB SSD.
>
> It was an EDU series and I *THINK* I have the bios set right. Defaulting
> to first UEFI boot now
The following Fedora 30 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-160303ebeb
libidn2-2.3.0-1.fc30
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-71b2273a9f
libarchive-3.3.3-7.fc30
10
On 2019-12-01 09:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Kind of.
>
> I just put together the notebook I will be using when F32 ships. It is a
> Lenovo X140e, 8GB memory, and a 500GB SSD.
>
> It was an EDU series and I *THINK* I have the bios set right. Defaulting to
> first UEFI boot now rather than
Kind of.
I just put together the notebook I will be using when F32 ships. It is
a Lenovo X140e, 8GB memory, and a 500GB SSD.
It was an EDU series and I *THINK* I have the bios set right. Defaulting
to first UEFI boot now rather than Legacy first.
I do have limited time, but I am willing
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 9:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> 7. People vote by submitting comments containing VOTE +1/0/-1 on a
> separate line (and including any justification or feedback they wish in the
> comment as well; the command has to simply be on its own line so that we
> can detect it
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Pagure
> ***
>
> This is very similar to the Bugzilla description. For each proposed blocker,
> we (auto-)create a ticket in a "fedora-blockers" project, for the purpose of
> a blocker discussion. We interlink the bug and the ticket.
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
10 matches
Mail list logo
