Re: system-upgrade on RPi fails

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:06 PM Alessio wrote: > > Hello. > I don't remember if it has always been this way. > I was trying to upgrade from Fedora 38 to 39 on a Raspberry. > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=39 > > The point is that on the subsequent boot, following > dnf

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and > Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a working gaming experience > in Fedora Linux releases. This is motivated by the issue we had in the > F37 cycle

Re: rc.local fails

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:54 AM George R Goffe via test wrote: > > Howdy, > > To get rc.local running you used to be able to put the file in /etc/rc.d and > then reboot. > > This has worked for quite some time but does not any more. This situation has > been happening now for several months.

Re: F38 dnf modules isn't going to be functional

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:54 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:14 AM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:20 PM Frantisek Zatloukal >> wrote: >>> >>> But that's microdnf, not the current default dnf. I don'

Re: F38 dnf modules isn't going to be functional

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:20 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > But that's microdnf, not the current default dnf. I don't think microdnf > was used by default in any of our blocking spins/images. > We ship microdnf in the arm minimal image due to issues with dnf and memory usage[1] and it's used

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 5:52 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:47 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > Accepted blockers > > - > > > > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image > > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED > > ACTION: Relevant

Re: Fedora-Minimal-37-20221014.n.0.aarch64 report bug

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:57 PM wang_chen wrote: > > download Fedora-Minimal-37-20221014.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz and install to > raspberry pi 3b+, > start display: 5.924021] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62! > [5.924021] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62! That doesn't provide any useful

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 37 Beta Release Announcement

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Fedora Linux 37 Beta Released > -- > > The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability > of Fedora Linux 37 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora Linux 37 > release > at

Re: Fedora IoT Test Day 7th April 2022

Hi Luna, Can you go into detail as to what worked/didn't work exactly, I don't have a context as to what that means. Peter On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:26 AM Luna Jernberg wrote: > Worked for me today :) > > Den ons 6 apr. 2022 15:52Luna Jernberg skrev: > >> did not work, will do a second try

Re: [Anaconda-devel] deprecate bootloader selection criterion

On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 1:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 6:54 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 2:37 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy > > > wrote: &

Re: [Anaconda-devel] deprecate bootloader selection criterion

On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 2:37 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria#Bootloader_disk_selection > > > > "The installer must allow the user to choose which disk the system > > bootloader

Re: Fedora Workstation Installation crashing when in EFI

> First time posting here. When I tried to install the beta on my laptop > while in EFI mode the installer would crash after installing the bootloader > and transition to configuring software and go back to GDM. When I switch my > laptop to Legacy it doesn't happen, which leads me to

Re: Heads up: Possible ext4 file issue in rawhide after updates of 17th or 18th of September

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 9:24 PM stan via test wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:39:38 -0600 > Chris Murphy wrote: > > > Could you file a bug and include: e2fsprogs version; kernel version > > for initial use (installation); kernel version the problem appears > > with, if different; and compete

Re: [External]Firmware updates not being applied?

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 3:15 AM Mark Pearson wrote: > > Do you have secure boot enabled? > > There's currently an issue with shim that is preventing fwupdx64.efi working > properly when SB is enabled. I know they're working on it - but workaround > for now is to disable SB. This is still an

Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 3:18 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > > > On 23/04/2021 16:57, Peter Robinson wrote: > [snip] > > > > There's the RPi4 that will work in 32 bit mode and it is available > > with 2-8gb of RAM, there's i.MX6 devices with 2+gb of RAM, there

Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+

> > If there is documentation or marketing that gives the impression that > > Workstation on 32-bit ARM is some sort of > > priority/"supported"/recommended/blocking/whatever environment, it > > should be changed. > > The whole arm.fedoraproject.org website makes it seem like that. We > actually

Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+

> Now, not to be a stick in the mud, but what other common armhfp hardware > is out there? If the Pi 3B+ isn't "up to the task", perhaps desktop > images that aren't expected work should just be dropped? I'm not sure a > desktop environment running on armhfp in a VM is that common of a use case.

Re: Wayland apparently not compatible with new UHD Graphics CPUs

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:03 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 15:59 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > I know I'm the one who always runs the old PCs, but I recently decided I > > should have one new one in the mix. The one I got has an ASUS Z590-A > > motherboard and an

Re: heads up: kernel-5.12-rc1 and swapfile corruption

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's > some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;( Note it's only for swap files, not partitions or zram/zswap, so most default Fedora use cases should be unaffected.

linux-firmware heads up for brcmfmac wifi firmware

Hi All, Just a heads up for those that have a brcmfmac, the Cypress variants of these WiFi modules (there's 3 vendors that make them: Broadcom, Cypress/Infineon and now Synaptics) have got new firmwares, I'm giving a heads up because in some cases the firmwares are being updated from firmwares

Re: [fedora-arm] Enabled some openQA desktop tests on aarch64

Hey Adam, Sorry for the delayed reply here. I wanted to reply properly, then it got lost in my inbox. > Hey folks! Just a heads up that I merged a branch I've had lying around > for weeks that enables *some* of the openQA desktop tests on the > aarch64 Workstation image. Thanks for this, it's

Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 3:50 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > A large computer vendor with whom we have a friendly relationship would like > to update the image they're shipping on their systems so that 1) new users > don't have quite so many updates immediately and 2) auiu newer kernel helps > with

Re: [fedora-arm] aarch64 testing enabled in openQA production

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:31 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > > A few of you have seen this already, but just wanted to send out a > wider announcement: having been deservedly shamed by pbrobinson, I > spent most of this week working on aarch64 testing in openQA, and am > happy to

Re: Fedora SOAS 33 Beta Startup Goes Straight to Login Screen

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:51 PM Silvia Sánchez wrote: > > > Hello there! > > How did you install it? SOAS is supposed to run live. The quick test I did on a live SoAS nightly went to a login screen, there's been no recent changes to the SoAS kickstart or the Sugar UX so there's something that's

Re: FC33 beta thunder-bird access to smtp tls v1

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:23 PM William John Murray wrote: > > Dear fedora, > > Any suggestions for things to check? For me this is a blocker on > fc33... Probably set the crypto policy to legacy: update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY ___ test

Re: F33 testing request: bluetooth mice

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:21 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 21:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:02 PM Brandon Nielsen > > wrote: > > > > > > On 10/14/20 11:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >

Re: F33 testing request: bluetooth mice

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:02 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote: > > On 10/14/20 11:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > A new proposed blocker bug showed up today: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874082 > > > > the issue is that if you have a bluetooth mouse working, then

Re: F33 testing request: bluetooth mice

> A new proposed blocker bug showed up today: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874082 > > the issue is that if you have a bluetooth mouse working, then suspend > the system, when you resume the bluetooth mouse will not be working any > more. You have to go into the GNOME Bluetooth

Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B

> I am trying to boot Fedora IoT aarch64 images on my Raspberry Pi 4B but > failing to do so as I see an error that EFI was unable to load the image. I > have tried using the raw images of the current 32 IoT and 33 Pre-release IoT. > Please tell me where I am going wrong. As per the IoT

Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B

> Thanks for your response. Note, however, that this info is "as of" almost a > year ago. Has any progress been made since then? As the maintainer of these devices in Fedora I can clearly state they are still unsupported. I do this in my own time, I don't have time to do kernel development nor

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 10/2/20 12:32 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > Beta is out! Time to focus on Final blockers. > > > > Action summary > > > > > > Accepted blockers > > - > > 1. firefox — Firefox not using langpacks for

Re: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit)

> Hi, folks. I'm sad to report that Thomas Gilliard (satellit), who was a > valued member of the QA team for many years, passed away last week. His > wife contacted me with the news. Thomas was a regular and reassuring > presence at QA and blocker review meetings and ran many thousands of > tests

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 33 RC 20200703.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:19 AM Jaap Bosman wrote: > > Hi, > > On https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html I see > Fedora-Rawhide-20200704.n.1 and not jul 3? > > where is 20200703? for testing? This is IoT edition: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/iot/ > > On 03-07-2020 19:07,

Re: Suggest a new criterion for Suspend.

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:35 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello friends, > yesterday, during the Blocker Review Meeting we decided to suggest a > blocking criterion for suspending the system, because it would clarify the > situations where to accept a blocker like the one from yesterday >

Re: IoT release blocking images

> Sorry for the delay on this, but I have updated[1] the Release > Blocking wiki page[2] to include the IoT blocking images as I > understand them. If I have misunderstood, please let me know. That looks fine to me, Paul can you please double check. > [1] >

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

> > Hello team, > > > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca > > > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, > > tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day > >

Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33

> I am a Rawhide user, although I am not your intended audience.I just like > tinkering with it. > > Today, my install of Rawhide ( Xfce ), tried futily to update to the f33 path. > > I would like to know what I need to do to continue on that f33 path. I am > missing a key. Right ? The

Re: Proposal to change ARM Release Blocking Criteria - Drop XFCE (32bit), Add Workstation(64bit)

> > > Proposed changes to the Desktop release criteria for ARM and AArch64 in > > > Fedora 32: > > > * drop Xfce on 32-bit ARM from release blocking desktops > > > * add Workstation on AArch64 to release blocking desktops > > > > I am not following recent developments of chap arm based mini

Re: Proposal to change ARM Release Blocking Criteria - Drop XFCE (32bit), Add Workstation(64bit)

> > Proposed changes to the Desktop release criteria for ARM and AArch64 in > > Fedora 32: > > * drop Xfce on 32-bit ARM from release blocking desktops > > * add Workstation on AArch64 to release blocking desktops > > > Program Management is okay with this proposal, but ideally I'd like to >

Re: Proposal to change ARM Release Blocking Criteria - Drop XFCE (32bit), Add Workstation(64bit)

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Proposed changes to the Desktop release criteria for ARM and AArch64 in > > Fedora 32: > > * drop Xfce on 32-bit ARM from release blocking desktops > > * add Workstation on AArch64 to release blocking desktops > > I am not following

Re: Kernel test day and exfat

On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:41 PM Alessio wrote: > > I read that kernel 5.4 now support exfat filesystem. Does this feature will > be enabled in the kernel shipped by Fedora? It was initially enabled but caused issues so was disabled again. The samsung team that originally developed it have done a

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 9:06 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 14:58 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does > > > someone want to propose a set (ideally

Re: Release blocking architectures

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:40 AM Alessio wrote: > > Hello. > Please forgive all my dumb questions. > I need just a clarification. What are release blocking architectures nowadays? > In the test matrix there is ARM alongside x86_64. > This means armv7hl or aarch64? There's more release blocking

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:50 AM David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Yeah, that's where I was going to go next (there has already been a > > thread about this this morning). If what we care about is that Fedora > > boots on EC2, that's what we

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

> On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the > > criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, but > > that is no longer the case, most if not all EC2 instance types no > > longer use Xen. >

Re: Fedora 30 Final blocker status email #2

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > Final freeze begins on Tuesday, 16 April. Fedora 30 release is > currently scheduled for 30 April. > > Action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197 >

Re: Fedora IoT Edition test day 2019-03-13

Adding IoT list for reference too :) On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:33 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey All, > > Fedora Internet of Things is a variant of Fedora focused on IoT > ecosystems. > Whether you’re working on a home assistant, industrial gateways, or data > storage and analytics, Fedora

Re: Eucalyptus

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:44 PM wrote: > > In the Cloud test matrix [1], there is an Eucalyptus section. > I don't know what it was (it is), but https://www.eucalyptus.com/ > doesn't exist anymore. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190214.n.0_Cloud > > Such

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was > broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became > apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which > seems like an oversight. > > I discussed this briefly with Matthias Clasen this

Re: F29-armhfp - updates-testing updates

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:16 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Should I install updates from the updates-testing repo on my Cubieboard2 > Xfce setup at this time? > > Is there something there that I could check out? I don't see anything > there connected to what I am currently doing. But then I

Re: Fedora 29 Beta blocker status mail #1

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:06 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Adam, > > What is the position on openSSL 1.1.1? > > The openSSL team has targeted Sept 11 as the release date, and I have > not seen any other word on the user list. Of course there may be > different discussion elsewhere. > > For all

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

>> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since >> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :) >> >> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still >> at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a >> bit of catching

Re: Broken dnf from 06-30-2018

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > > Has anyone discovered a way forward for updating Fedora Rawhide given dnf just > seg faults currently? Can you use rpm to just update it lmanually? > -- > Russel. > === > Dr Russel Winder t:

Re: Broken dnf from 06-30-2018

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2018-07-01 at 09:19 +0100, Russel Winder wrote: >> I wonder if this >> episode indicates that there should be work done to make sure that a broken >> dnf can never be installed? > > How do you propose we do that? Personally I would

Re: Update 2018-06-30 breaks dnf

On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2018-07-01 at 09:56 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> […] >> >> The python 3.7 rebuild should mostly be complete so I suspect it'll be >> tagged into the main f29 rawhide repository early next week. >>

Re: Update 2018-06-30 breaks dnf

On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2018-07-01 at 09:16 +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > […] >> >> It seems this is the only way forward except: dnf 3.0.1 is broken, 3.0.2 >> requires Python 3.7 ABI but 3.6.5 is installed. dnf 2.7.5 also seems to >> require Python 3.7 API

Re: GNOME: log in not possible/crash after update/upgrade

>> today, I've updated my fedora (from 2018-04-17, with updates-testing). >> After reboot, I wasn't able to log in (session just crashed right after >> typing my password). The bug is already reported in BZ: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573683 >> >> The reason of crash and

Re: GNOME: log in not possible/crash after update/upgrade

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > Hi, > today, I've updated my fedora (from 2018-04-17, with updates-testing). After > reboot, I wasn't able to log in (session just crashed right after typing my > password). The bug is already reported in BZ: >

Re: SD slot errors

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:45 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > I've just installed F28 beta on my Cube Mix Plus tablet. It seems to > work but a sequence of messages keep showing up in the dmesg > output every 10 seconds. > > Note: this is the first time I've used Linux with this

Re: F28 with GCC 8 ?

On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, 17:44 Ed Greshko, wrote: > I was trying to get a 3rd party utility compiled on F28 and it failed. I > didn't do > any research or debugging but since it works fine on F27 I'm guessing it > is due to changes in GCC from 7 to 8 which the 3rd party

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, 00:42 Adam Williamson, wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular

Re: kernel update process (failure)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 03/21/2018 05:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I know this isn't strictly a "test" question. But I think maybe more folks >> with >> greater insight my be lurking here. >> >> In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the

Re: F28 System Wide Change: AArch64 Server Promotion

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 03:43 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> > A significant miss here is 'testing'. Making an arch primary means we >> > need to ensure we have the necessary

Re: F28 System Wide Change: AArch64 Server Promotion

>> > == Scope == >> > * Proposal owners: >> > The general AArch64 support is already in place and is widely and >> > actively supported by the Fedora ARM SIG and numerous ARM vendors >> > and >> > third parties in Fedora. There will be further and wider support, >> > hardware enablement, polish

Re: F28 System Wide Change: AArch64 Server Promotion

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 8 January 2018 at 12:28, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:16:05AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> A significant miss here is 'testing'. Making an arch primary means

Re: F28 System Wide Change: AArch64 Server Promotion

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 14:40 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> >> == Scope == >> * Proposal owners: >> The general AArch64 support is already in place and is widely and >> actively supported by the Fedora ARM SIG and

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: updates to address today's CPU/kernel vulnerability

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:49 AM, stan wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:23:58 +0800 > Ed Greshko wrote: > > >> And how about >> https://www.windowscentral.com/all-modern-processors-impacted-new-meltdown-and-spectre-exploits >> ? > >> Unless there

Re: Cheese: no longer works with my webcam, other testing requested

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > Doing the 'desktop_menus' validation test for Final RC-1.2 - the awful > one where you have to run every app on the live image - I just found > that Cheese doesn't seem to work with my webcam any

Re: Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status. > > tl;dr action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 >

Re: Shim update breaks booting (was: Fedora 27 compose report: 20170825.n.0 changes)

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:24:59PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote: >> Package: shim-signed-13-0.2 >> Old package: shim-signed-0.8-10 >> Summary: First-stage UEFI bootloader >> RPMs: shim-aa64

Re: F27: SELinux is preventing journald to start

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Dario Lesca wrote: > After updating today and reboot: Adam has already started a thread about this, check the details in that thread (useful to check that stuff before emailing too) ___ test mailing

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller >> <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote: >> Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging >> problems? I could write a bug if you think that might be a good thing >> to do. > >

Re: Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Hi, folks! A while ago, Xen virtualization functionality was added to >> the criteria and the validation test case set, on the understanding >> that Oracle would provide testing for it (and help fix bugs as they

Re: Unstable gnome shell F26

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > GNOME Shell F26 x86_64 crashes spontaneously and logs me out. > ABRT wasn't even installed. > > Where to start debugging these days? It's probably a driver/GPU bug, the actual shell for me has been rock solid of late

Re: Problem with F26 fedora repo?

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Ed Greshko <ed.gres...@greshko.com> wrote: > On 06/16/17 22:55, Peter Robinson wrote: >> I've seen that if the date/time is wrong due to cert verification. >> Also you can add =global to the end of the repo URL and see if >> that works an

Re: Problem with F26 fedora repo?

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Ed Greshko <ed.gres...@greshko.com> wrote: > On 06/16/17 22:27, Peter Robinson wrote: >> I don't think so and it's mirrored out. I suspect you're in an area >> where there's not a lot of country based mirrors (I've seen this in >>

Re: Problem with F26 fedora repo?

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Hi, > > I've been seeing this now for the past 14hrs, or there about > > [root@f26-b14 yum.repos.d]# dnf clean metadata > Cache was expired > 24 files removed > [root@f26-b14 yum.repos.d]# dnf check-update > Fedora

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: >> > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Mike Ruckman <ro...@fedoraproject.org> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: >> I don't really understand this, and I haven't read the meeting log, so I >> apologize if my questions are dumb. > > I was in the meeting, and I was

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Richard Ryniker wrote: > I agree with you that Firefox is an important resource that Fedora should > deliver, but think a criterion that failure to supply the same default > package set for all (blocking) architectures will do more harm than

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

>> For a little background, yesterday we had a very long discussion of a >> bug[1] during the blocker bug meeting. The quick overview of that bug is >> that Firefox failed to build on some non-x86 architectures, so the >> package maintainer opted to stop building Firefox on anything but i686 >>

Re: Fedora 26 Alpha status update

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Just wanted to let everyone know where we're at with the F26 > Alpha. > > An Alpha RC2 compose request is in, and RC2 should be building at > present. The main change between RC1 and RC2 is a fix for

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 12:10 +, Russel Winder wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > >> >> […] >> > You can always just pull it

Re: Package caching

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:45 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > […] >> >> you can set a private Fedora mirror using squid, my old write up is >> at >> http://sharkcz.livejournal.com/2534.html (my server still works :-)) >> and

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > I appreciate that Rawhide always has the latest kernel snapshot as the > one and only kernel and that it is up to users to manage their own > kernels. However I wonder if there should be a simple, standard way of > being

Re: **URGENT** karma request (Wordpress)

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Jonathan Calloway wrote: > Question - is there a place you can point me for adding the necessary repos > for EPEL? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#How_can_I_use_these_extra_packages.3F >> On Feb 2, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Adam

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate RC-20161119.3 Available Now!

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 18:16 -0800, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-20161119.3 is >> now >> available for testing. Please help us complete all the

Re: Does the Rawhide stop rolling?

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Bowen Wang wrote: > Hi everyone, > I haven't seen updates from Rawhide since Monday, does it stop rolling > or frozen? There was a bit of a blip in the road, it's running again now and there should be a compose completed later on today.

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, <rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is now >> available for testing. Please help us complete al

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: >

Re: Fedora 24 Final blocker bug status mail #2

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! The Final freeze kicks in soon, so time for another blocker > bug update. > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318045 - anaconda - NEW >Incorrect keymap when decrypting encrypted

Re: Fedora 24 won't boot after upgrade

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Ricardo Argüello wrote: > Graphical login won't display after reboot, you should disable SELinux. > selinux-policy and selinux-policy-targeted 3.13.1-183 are the culprits: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331619 > > Update

Re: No updates?

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > The Fedora Rawhide mirrors appear to have had no updates of Rawhide > since 2016-03-31. Given I am normally used to 200MB+ per day to have > gone 5 days with no updates is bordering on the traumatic! :-) The updates are

Re: No desktop icons with "gnome on wayland" as desktop variant in F24

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi F24 testers, > > I installed F24 workstation and set "gnome on wayland" as login option, set > "Dektop icons" to "on" using gnome-tweak-tool, but still desktop icons are > not shown (same problem as in F23).

Re: Next push to F24?

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22=F24 > > There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as > 11 days. When will be the next push to "stable"? Once Alpha gets signed off... same process

Re: Pungi 4 milestone builds: proposals

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> releng flipped any necessary switches for >> 'release' behaviour. > > I think this is the only meaningful argument for having TC/RC distinction. > Personally I'm fine with it both ways. It's nice to see which images are

Re: f24, livecd-tools vs livemedia-creator

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Possibly three separate questions: > > Which one is now being used to create lives? In F-24+ live-media-creator > Bugs for livemedia-creator are assigned to lorax right? Correct. > When I boot

  1   2   3   >