Re: [patch] more robust startup + counting

2001-11-29 Thread Doug MacEachern
this broke something. i keep getting: % t/TEST ... waiting for server to start: ok (waited 0 secs) ... still waiting for server to warm up: ok (waited 1 secs) failed to start server! (please examine t/logs/error_log) and yet the server is running.

Re: [patch] more robust startup + counting

2001-11-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
That would be my patch to detect an 'extra unused arg' to httpd. As it is, there was no quick-fix I could see, so I've reverted. Update your httpd-2.0 cvs - Original Message - From: Doug MacEachern [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:34 AM

Re: [patch] more robust startup + counting

2001-11-29 Thread Stas Bekman
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: That would be my patch to detect an 'extra unused arg' to httpd. As it is, there was no quick-fix I could see, so I've reverted. Update your httpd-2.0 cvs In this particular case it was a bug in my latest patch. It's fixed now. - Original Message - From: Doug

Re: example of a t/SKIP file?

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Doing this on Win32 (NT4), I have a t\SKIP file containing: modules/dav ssl/all And yet I get these when running t\TEST. And yes, I've tried it with sloshes rather than slashes. Is it checking for requirements *before* checking t\SKIP? modules\dav.skipped: cannot find module 'dav',

Re: example of a t/SKIP file?

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Doing this on Win32 (NT4), I have a t\SKIP file containing: modules/dav ssl/all Stone me! OtherBill was right; these need to be specified as modules\\dav ssl\\all on Win32. Bleargh.. Thanks, Bill! -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini

Re: example of a t/SKIP file?

2001-11-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Doing this on Win32 (NT4), I have a t\SKIP file containing: modules/dav ssl/all Stone me! OtherBill was right; these need to be specified as modules\\dav ssl\\all on Win32. Bleargh.. May be the SKIP file's parser should complain when it

Re: example of a t/SKIP file?

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I'd like to see the modules::dav syntax adopted +1 This would certainly make things more consistent/simple to document. Don't you mean 'more consistent::simple'? :-) -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer,

Re: example of a t/SKIP file?

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Stas Bekman wrote: modules\\dav ssl\\all May be the SKIP file's parser should complain when it cannot find the specified files? No, I don't think so -- then you'd have to special-case wildcards. I'd just rather it was consistent -- and even better, platform-neutral. I like OtherBill's

Re: [patch] more robust startup + counting

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Stas Bekman wrote: In this particular case it was a bug in my latest patch. It's fixed now. Eh, I'm now getting this on Win32: perl t\TEST apache.exe -v failed: Bad file descriptor at Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm line 687. ?? -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini

Re: [patch] more robust startup + counting

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Stas Bekman wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Eh, I'm now getting this on Win32: perl t\TEST apache.exe -v failed: Bad file descriptor at Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm line 687. I don't think this has anything to do with this. If the line counter wasn't shifted,

Re: [patch] more robust startup + counting

2001-11-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I don't think this has anything to do with this. If the line counter wasn't shifted, you've got a broken Symbol::gensym. The failing line is: open $handle, $cmd| or die $cmd failed: $!; -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar,