Geoffrey Young wrote:
OK, please let us know when and if you see it again.
I see that there were quite a few changes since the last A-T release,
any volunteers to wear the Release Manager cap and get a new version out?
I'll do it, once the need_* functions have been implemented (which I'll do
as w
> OK, please let us know when and if you see it again.
>
> I see that there were quite a few changes since the last A-T release,
> any volunteers to wear the Release Manager cap and get a new version out?
I'll do it, once the need_* functions have been implemented (which I'll do
as well :)
--Ge
William McKee wrote:
How about the current cvs? Do you still get it?
I haven't tried it since my last email and don't have much spare time
at the moment. I suspect I'll run across it again when the next A::T
release comes out if it's not fixed . I'll keep my eyes open.
OK, please let us know when
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:27:47PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Finally getting back to this thread Even with the latest Apache-Test
> >from CVS, I'm still getting the infinite looping when A::T tries to do
> >it's self-configuration.
>
> Sorry for taking so long to followup, William. It's har
William McKee wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not sure, but you could run both with tracing on -trace=debug or
APACHE_TEST_TRACE_LEVEL=debug and then compare the logs. Could be that in
one case it finds a global httpd.conf but not in the other?
Hi Stas,
Fi
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I'm not sure, but you could run both with tracing on -trace=debug or
> APACHE_TEST_TRACE_LEVEL=debug and then compare the logs. Could be that in
> one case it finds a global httpd.conf but not in the other?
Hi Stas,
Finally getting
William McKee wrote:
Thanks for the info Stas and Joe. I will try rebuilding with Joe's
suggestion. However, I'm curious why things work just fine when I run
the tests and pass in the path to httpd. For example:
t/TEST -httpd /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
I'm not sure, but you could run both with
Thanks for the info Stas and Joe. I will try rebuilding with Joe's
suggestion. However, I'm curious why things work just fine when I run
the tests and pass in the path to httpd. For example:
t/TEST -httpd /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
William
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:19:10PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
> >problem That appears to be a problem. If I try to run it as a normal
> >user (which is how I was testing), I get the following error:
> >
> > Ouch! ap_mm_crea
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:43:49PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So does this file exist and executable? /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd? any
symlinks involved? I fail to reproduce it on my machine.
Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
problem That
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:43:49PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> So does this file exist and executable? /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd? any
> symlinks involved? I fail to reproduce it on my machine.
Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
problem That appears to be a
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, what do you have inside:
/home/william/.apache-test/Apache/TestConfigData.pm
[...]
$Apache::TestConfigData::vars = {
'httpd' => '/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd',
So does this file exist and executable
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Thanks William, what do you have inside:
> /home/william/.apache-test/Apache/TestConfigData.pm
package Apache::TestConfigData;
use strict;
use warnings;
$Apache::TestConfigData::vars = {
'httpd' => '/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd',
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
Got the latest version from CVS again and
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Please show us the verbose trace:
>
> t/TEST -trace=debug
>
> including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
> brought you back to interactive config again.
Got the latest version from CVS again and this t
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
ok, the plan was to roll an official release this afternoon (as in now).
what's the feeling on this? r
> Please show us the verbose trace:
>
> t/TEST -trace=debug
>
> including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
> brought you back to interactive config again.
ok, the plan was to roll an official release this afternoon (as in now).
what's the feeling on this? release
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:00:36PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Make sure you don't have APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES env var turned
on. That's exactly the problem I've raised in the other thread.
Yeah, I read some of that thread though didn't follow the exact details.
In a
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:00:36PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Make sure you don't have APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES env var turned
> on. That's exactly the problem I've raised in the other thread.
Yeah, I read some of that thread though didn't follow the exact details.
In any case, the only
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:58:36AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, it was due to my recent change to remove the use of
revision 2 as a default.
I was able to reproduce it. Now fixed in cvs. Please confirm that it works
for you.
Hi Stas,
Actually I just pulled it ou
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:58:36AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Thanks William, it was due to my recent change to remove the use of
> revision 2 as a default.
> I was able to reproduce it. Now fixed in cvs. Please confirm that it works
> for you.
Hi Stas,
Actually I just pulled it out of CVS and
William McKee wrote:
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
I had errors during testing which appear to be due to problems with the
auto configuration. Here's the steps I used:
perl Make
> please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
> applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
I had errors during testing which appear to be due to problems with the
auto configuration. Here's the steps I used:
perl Makefile.PL
make
On May 19, 2004, at 9:02 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.11 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.11-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your
existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back succ
blargh - cut and paste error. the subject should read Apache-Test-1.11.
--Geoff
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.11 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.11-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
--Geoff
Changes since 1.10:
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:35 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I have no problems posting attachements to this list (mozilla-mail ||
pine). It's possible that it's specific to your mail sw. Have you
tried contacting test-dev-owner to report this problem?
No, haven't worried about it too much. I'll
David Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:25 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
That's because the mail list software strips them off! I'll send it
to you directly.
eh? since when? it's a first time I hear that. Is it because of the
way your mailer attaches them?
Doubt it, but it has happene
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:25 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
That's because the mail list software strips them off! I'll send it
to you directly.
eh? since when? it's a first time I hear that. Is it because of the
way your mailer attaches them?
Doubt it, but it has happened to me on this list be
David Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Can you please test with the current cvs, should be fixed now.
Confirmed, thanks!
Thanks for testing, David.
I don't think we have changed anything, besides the patches you've
submitted by yourself ;) There is no p
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Can you please test with the current cvs, should be fixed now.
Confirmed, thanks!
I don't think we have changed anything, besides the patches you've
submitted by yourself ;) There is no patch attachment, btw.
That's because the mail lis
David Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 01:07 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.06 is now available. 1.06 is
the version of Apache-Test that will ship with mod_perl 1.99_11.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.06-dev.tar.gz
please take the ti
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 01:07 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.06 is now available. 1.06 is
the version of Apache-Test that will ship with mod_perl 1.99_11.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.06-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the c
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.06 is now available. 1.06 is the
version of Apache-Test that will ship with mod_perl 1.99_11.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.06-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-
34 matches
Mail list logo
