Re: Apache::Test renaming foo

Jan Price wrote: I'm not sure how I got on this list - but please take me off! I know some computer languages, but what you're writing is "over my head!!" list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: __

Re: Apache::Test renaming foo

Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: that other thread was becoming too much to follow :) You just ruined the record we were heading to. It was 62 messages and growing. ;) Or would you rather say, that you are anxious to publish the article? ;) well, it's less about my

Re: Apache::Test renaming foo

AIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:04 PM Subject: Re: Apache::Test renaming foo > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > >> that other thread was becoming too much to follow :) > > > > > > Or would you rather say, tha

Re: Apache::Test renaming foo

Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: that other thread was becoming too much to follow :) Or would you rather say, that you are anxious to publish the article? ;) well, it's less about my level of anxiety than it is about managing expectations and keeping everyone informed :) [snip] The la

Re: Apache::Test renaming foo

Geoffrey Young wrote: that other thread was becoming too much to follow :) Or would you rather say, that you are anxious to publish the article? ;) I thought it might be a nice idea to wrap up the issues thus far because it seems to me we have a consensus on how to resolve the Apache::[Tt]est col

Apache::Test renaming foo

that other thread was becoming too much to follow :) I thought it might be a nice idea to wrap up the issues thus far because it seems to me we have a consensus on how to resolve the Apache::[Tt]est collision issues. from what I can see, stas has come up with a few patches that make it possible