Re: finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Tomas G. Rokicki
I'd be content to apply that patch (to the TeXLive tree, which is the current dvips `source' as far as I'm concerned) unless I hear any objections . . . -tom

Re: finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Paul Vojta
> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 23:55:18 +0100 > From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce a new teTeX pretest release. Thomas: I hav

small update to teTeX pretest (20011104)

2001-11-04 Thread Thomas Esser
I just have fixed the depend.mk files for xdvik / oxdvik in the teTeX pretest. The two new files that I just have uploaded to my server are teTeX-src-beta-20011103-20011104.xdelta teTeX-src-beta-20011104.tar.gz They will appear on CTAN in systems/unix/teTeX-beta in the next few hours. I will

Re: finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Thomas Esser
> I think these lines in texk/make/rdepend.mk are supposed to > delete the system dependencies on X libraries: > > @MAINT@ -e 's,/usr[^ ]* ,,g' \ > @MAINT@ -e 's,/usr[^ ]*$$,,g' \ Thanks, that's it. I just have added /software to these patterns and recreated the depend

Re: finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
> "Thomas" == Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I cannot reproduce this. I guess, that some local fmtutil.cnf > file on your side wants to create a "mptopdf" format. Just > remove that line from your fmtutil.cnf file is the best > solution, I think. Yes, that was th

Re: finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Thomas Esser
> 1) remove texk/xdvik/depend.mk >This file contained absolute paths to the X11 stuff. Ok, my fault. I have enabled maintainer mode and recreated texk/xdvik/depend.mk. I had to replace this file, because I have restructured the libs stuff. I think that if I enable maintainer mode, then I also

finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Stefan Ulrich
[ Reinhard wrote: ] >> 2) remove the lines >> #ifndef MAKING_HEADER >> #include "krheader.h" >> #endif >> from texk/xdvik/xdvi.c >> I do not know whether these changes are correct [ I wrote: ] > Well, this header is needed for K&R compatibility, so it doesn't > hurt to remove it if you have

finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Reinhard Kotucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > to get everything compiled I had to do the following changes: > 1) remove texk/xdvik/depend.mk >This file contained absolute paths to the X11 stuff. I was just about to write a similar followup ;-) This is the path: /software/oss/X11/X11R6.

finally: new teTeX pretest (20011103)

2001-11-04 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
Hi, to get everything compiled I had to do the following changes: 1) remove texk/xdvik/depend.mk This file contained absolute paths to the X11 stuff. 2) remove the lines #ifndef MAKING_HEADER #include "krheader.h" #endif from texk/xdvik/xdvi.c I do not know whether these chang