Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes

2005-02-08 Thread Thomas Esser
Hi Frank, It seems to me that texconfig-sys init should call fmtutil-sys and updmap-sys, too, not fmtutil and updmap plain - I didn't check for texlinks.] That is wrong, just try texconfig-sys formats change some bits in the config file (-goes via fmtutil --edit to TEXMFSYSCONFIG) and the

Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0

2005-02-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Thomas Esser writes: Hmm. Maybe, in texmf.cnf, TEXMFVAR must be added to SYSTEXMF SYSTEXMF works for what it is good for: to decide if some font source comes from a system tree. Texmf.cnf says about SYSTEXMF % The system trees. These are the trees that are shared by all the users.

Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0

2005-02-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Frank Küster writes: Maybe SYSTEXMF should be renamed to TEXMFSYSFONTS? Hm, which version of teTeX in Debian do you mean? For the 3.0 packages, neither TEXMFVAR nor TEXMFSYSVAR will be in TEXMFSYS. Ah, I see, there were some major changes after 2.99.7 that I haven't introduced into my

Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes

2005-02-08 Thread George N. White III
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Thomas Esser wrote: Did you notice that the table of contents of the INSTALL file is still: Yes, I noticed it when I looked it up today. Unfortunately, I did not notice it before the release. :-( Nor any of the testers! Microsoft has the advantage that they can hire someone