Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes

2005-02-08 Thread Thomas Esser
Hi Frank,

 It seems to me that texconfig-sys init should call fmtutil-sys and
 updmap-sys, too, not fmtutil and updmap plain - I didn't check for
 texlinks.]

That is wrong, just try
  texconfig-sys formats
change some bits in the config file (-goes via fmtutil --edit to
TEXMFSYSCONFIG) and the changed/added formats to via fmtutil --byfmt
to TEXMFSYSVAR).

The environment manipulation done in texconfig-sys has of course not
only some effect on the texconfig script that it calls, but also to all
other subprocesses.

 I have tried to understand how texconfig works if a user invokes it. As
 far as I can see, for every configuration file they touch, a copy is
 generated in TEXMFCONFIG (which is $HOME/.texmf-config by default).

Right.

 This seems to have the (probably unwanted effect) that the user is thus
 cut-off from site-wide changes.

The same is true if some user puts a custom copy of koma-script into
his $TEXMFHOME.

 If a user changes a configuration file $cfile for the first time, the
 changed file after check_out is not only copied or cat'ed to
 $TEXMFCONFIG/$relDir/$cfile, but additionally a diff or the change regex

Well, this sounds like a complicated solution (different config files
would need different kind of updates) with a questionable effect.

Thomas


Re: texconfig action and site-wide changes

2005-02-08 Thread George N. White III
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Thomas Esser wrote:
Did you notice that the table of contents of the INSTALL file is still:
Yes, I noticed it when I looked it up today. Unfortunately, I did not
notice it before the release. :-(
Nor any of the testers!  Microsoft has the advantage that they can hire 
someone who has never used a product and ask them to try installing it 
during testing.  TeTeX testers tend to be experienced so most probably 
didn't bother reading INSTALL.  It would be nice to get a few people who 
are new to TeX involved in testing.

--
George N. White III  [EMAIL PROTECTED]