> For those who are not aware, at DANTE, also work is being done on
> hyphenation and new version of patgen with UTF-8 support:
>
> https://lists.dante.de/pipermail/trennmuster/2018-November/thread.html#3649
Well, as it turned out, standard patgen *is* capable of processing
UTF-8 directly.
Hi all,
For those who are not aware, at DANTE, also work is being done on
hyphenation and new version of patgen with UTF-8 support:
https://lists.dante.de/pipermail/trennmuster/2018-November/thread.html#3649
Best,
Pander
On 12/3/2018 2:29 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
(sorry for the delayed post)
Attached is patgen.lua, which is a lua52/luatex version of patgen, is case
someone finds it useful as yet another port of patgen. The original plan was to
extend this to do utf-8, but I lost interest (and then lost
Hi,
(sorry for the delayed post)
Attached is patgen.lua, which is a lua52/luatex version of patgen, is case
someone finds it useful as yet another port of patgen. The original plan was to
extend this to do utf-8, but I lost interest (and then lost the sources also, so
this is a newly created
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:50:49PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Another possibility for an experienced C++ user would be to convert
> opatgen's (GPLed) source code to modern C++, then publishing it on
> gitlab or something similar.
>
>
>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:50:49PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Dear Werner and others,
> >>In this matter I defer entirely to the TUG hyphenation team
> >>(Arthur, Mojca, ...) who know infinitely more about such things
> >>than I ever did or will.
> >
> > I wrote a UTF-8 version
>>In this matter I defer entirely to the TUG hyphenation team
>>(Arthur, Mojca, ...) who know infinitely more about such things
>>than I ever did or will.
>
> I wrote a UTF-8 version of patgen a few years ago. It is very
> slow because I didn’t need it for production, but I can
Thanks, Philip, for forwarding this discussion to the TeX-hyphen list.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:20:53PM +, Philip Taylor wrote:
>In this matter I defer entirely to the TUG hyphenation team (Arthur,
>Mojca, ...) who know infinitely more about such things than I ever did or
>
David Carlisle wrote:
> would suggest that he
is (very wisely) using Xe[La]TeX rather than an 8-bit engine
But then I'm not sure that there is a suitable version of
patgen
