[Therion] 2 Map-connection issue - Going to four levels - Offset tests SAMD-ITF-IS example

2023-03-23 Thread Bruce Mutton
Thanks Martin So we now have confirmation of the same inconsistent map-connection behaviour, relative to offset level, across three different ways of managing surveys and maps: * Separate surveys and maps (Martin's example, Therion best practice) * Maps defined in surveys (My example

Re: [Therion] 2 Map-connection issue - Going to four levels - Offset tests SAMD-ITF-IS example

2023-03-23 Thread Martin Sluka via Therion
> 23. 3. 2023 v 20:13, Bruce Mutton : > > One more question. > I presume you have strict separation of surveys and maps in this dataset, as > demonstrated here https://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/faq#how_to_arrange_the_maps > and > https:

Re: [Therion] 2 Map-connection issue - Going to four levels - Offset tests SAMD-ITF-IS example

2023-03-23 Thread Martin Sluka via Therion
Hi, I used the offset only to generate final map. Definitions of particular maps is very simple: map modrovska_s01.map modrovska_s01 endmap map modrovska_s08.map modrovska_s08 endmap map modrovska_s03.map modrovska_s03 endmap map modrovska_s10.map modrovska_s10 endmap map modrovsk