Hi, I used the offset only to generate final map.
Definitions of particular maps is very simple: map modrovska_s01.map modrovska_s01 endmap map modrovska_s08.map modrovska_s08 endmap map modrovska_s03.map modrovska_s03 endmap map modrovska_s10.map modrovska_s10 endmap map modrovska_s11.map modrovska_s11 endmap map modrovska_s12.map modrovska_s12 endmap map modrovska_s12-21.map modrovska_s12.map modrovska_s21.map endmap map modrovska_s13.map modrovska_s13 endmap map modrovska_s14.map modrovska_s14 break modrovska_s14a endmap map modrovska_s15.map modrovska_s15 endmap map modrovska_s16.map modrovska_s16 endmap map modrovska_s19.map modrovska_s19 endmap map modrovska_s19-24-25.map modrovska_s19.map break modrovska_s24-25.map [0 -8 m] below endmap map modrovska_s20.map modrovska_s20 endmap map modrovska_s11-20.map modrovska_s11.map break modrovska_s20.map [-3 -3 m] below endmap map modrovska_s21.map modrovska_s21 break modrovska_s21a modrovska_s21b endmap map modrovska_s22.map modrovska_s22 endmap map modrovska_s24.map modrovska_s24 endmap map modrovska_s24-25.map modrovska_s25.map break modrovska_s24.map [0 -7 m] below endmap map modrovska_s25.map modrovska_s25 endmap map modrovska_s26.map modrovska_s26 endmap map modrovska_s27.map modrovska_s27 endmap map modrovska_s28.map modrovska_s28 endmap map modrovska_s30.map modrovska_s30a break modrovska_s30 endmap Martin > > Interesting Martin > Your example mostly demonstrates one level of offset, but it goes to two > levels bottom-left (to blue to purple), and apparently three levels at the > bottom (to green to blue to dark blue). However looking closely it seems > that the map-connection line to blue goes directly from yellow (ie not from > green). If this is the case there are two scenarios: > <image002.png> > Scenario 1 - based on the map-connection line I have highlighted, both the > green and blue are first-level offsets. I may be mistaken as the image is > not sufficiently clear. > If it is two levels of offset, then that is not sufficient to trigger the > ‘bug’ David and I have described. > If it is three levels of offset, then you have somehow managed to avoid the > ‘bug’ and the map-connection lines/points are coincidentally on the same > alignment. > > Scenario 2 – is that this example demonstrates the ‘bug’ described, if not > particularly clearly. My synopsis of the bug was “the line created by point > map-connection is only correctly originating from its parent map at the most > deeply nested level of offset and at the 1st level offset. At all other > (intermediate) offset levels, the map-connection line reverts to originating > from the top-level map, and not from its direct parent.” > > So Martin, if you could perhaps clarify. I suggest adding a horizontal > component to the light blue map in my snip above, and confirming whether the > map offsets are two or three level. > If it is two level, it does not test the bug. If it is three level and there > is no ‘bug’, the map connection line, blue to dark blue, should radiate from > blue and not from yellow. > > Tarquin > I’ll respond to your message later – off to work now! > > Thanks > Bruce > > From: Therion <therion-boun...@speleo.sk <mailto:therion-boun...@speleo.sk>> > On Behalf Of Martin Sluka via Therion > Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2023 23:08 > To: List for Therion users <therion@speleo.sk <mailto:therion@speleo.sk>> > Cc: Martin Sluka <martinsl...@mac.com <mailto:martinsl...@mac.com>> > Subject: Re: [Therion] 2 Map-connection issue - Going to four levels - Offset > tests SAMD-ITF-IS example > > Just a sample. Colorised by altitude. > > M. > > <image001.png> > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion@speleo.sk <mailto:Therion@speleo.sk> > https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion > <https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion>
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion