Hi,
I used the offset only to generate final map.
Definitions of particular maps is very simple:
map modrovska_s01.map
modrovska_s01
endmap
map modrovska_s08.map
modrovska_s08
endmap
map modrovska_s03.map
modrovska_s03
endmap
map modrovska_s10.map
modrovska_s10
endmap
map modrovska_s11.map
modrovska_s11
endmap
map modrovska_s12.map
modrovska_s12
endmap
map modrovska_s12-21.map
modrovska_s12.map
modrovska_s21.map
endmap
map modrovska_s13.map
modrovska_s13
endmap
map modrovska_s14.map
modrovska_s14
break
modrovska_s14a
endmap
map modrovska_s15.map
modrovska_s15
endmap
map modrovska_s16.map
modrovska_s16
endmap
map modrovska_s19.map
modrovska_s19
endmap
map modrovska_s19-24-25.map
modrovska_s19.map
break
modrovska_s24-25.map [0 -8 m] below
endmap
map modrovska_s20.map
modrovska_s20
endmap
map modrovska_s11-20.map
modrovska_s11.map
break
modrovska_s20.map [-3 -3 m] below
endmap
map modrovska_s21.map
modrovska_s21
break
modrovska_s21a
modrovska_s21b
endmap
map modrovska_s22.map
modrovska_s22
endmap
map modrovska_s24.map
modrovska_s24
endmap
map modrovska_s24-25.map
modrovska_s25.map
break
modrovska_s24.map [0 -7 m] below
endmap
map modrovska_s25.map
modrovska_s25
endmap
map modrovska_s26.map
modrovska_s26
endmap
map modrovska_s27.map
modrovska_s27
endmap
map modrovska_s28.map
modrovska_s28
endmap
map modrovska_s30.map
modrovska_s30a
break
modrovska_s30
endmap
Martin
>
> Interesting Martin
> Your example mostly demonstrates one level of offset, but it goes to two
> levels bottom-left (to blue to purple), and apparently three levels at the
> bottom (to green to blue to dark blue). However looking closely it seems
> that the map-connection line to blue goes directly from yellow (ie not from
> green). If this is the case there are two scenarios:
> <image002.png>
> Scenario 1 - based on the map-connection line I have highlighted, both the
> green and blue are first-level offsets. I may be mistaken as the image is
> not sufficiently clear.
> If it is two levels of offset, then that is not sufficient to trigger the
> ‘bug’ David and I have described.
> If it is three levels of offset, then you have somehow managed to avoid the
> ‘bug’ and the map-connection lines/points are coincidentally on the same
> alignment.
>
> Scenario 2 – is that this example demonstrates the ‘bug’ described, if not
> particularly clearly. My synopsis of the bug was “the line created by point
> map-connection is only correctly originating from its parent map at the most
> deeply nested level of offset and at the 1st level offset. At all other
> (intermediate) offset levels, the map-connection line reverts to originating
> from the top-level map, and not from its direct parent.”
>
> So Martin, if you could perhaps clarify. I suggest adding a horizontal
> component to the light blue map in my snip above, and confirming whether the
> map offsets are two or three level.
> If it is two level, it does not test the bug. If it is three level and there
> is no ‘bug’, the map connection line, blue to dark blue, should radiate from
> blue and not from yellow.
>
> Tarquin
> I’ll respond to your message later – off to work now!
>
> Thanks
> Bruce
>
> From: Therion <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> On Behalf Of Martin Sluka via Therion
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2023 23:08
> To: List for Therion users <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: Martin Sluka <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [Therion] 2 Map-connection issue - Going to four levels - Offset
> tests SAMD-ITF-IS example
>
> Just a sample. Colorised by altitude.
>
> M.
>
> <image001.png>
> _______________________________________________
> Therion mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
> <https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion>
_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
