urn my attention to non-sphinx issues.
Thanks again Pat for taking the time to respond, and for getting me
thinking about some different possibilities. It's greatly appreciated!
Cheers,
Simon
On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 07:47:18 UTC-5, Pat Allan wrote:
>
> Hmm, this is certainly an odd one! Is
params[:criteria], :with => filters, :sort_mode
=> :extended, :order => order
Thanks again,
Simon
On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 07:29:36 UTC-5, Pat Allan wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I guess the first place I’d start is by verifying the number of records
> you’re expecting Sphin
y have any ideas what might be
happening here, or any other suggestions for what I can try?
Thanks,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a
is implemented using apartment and a subdomain
matcher. You can find current code in the tenancy branch of Bookyt
(https://github.com/huerlisi/bookyt/tree/tenancy). Installation docs
(INSTALL.textile might be a little out of date regarding tenancy, just ping
me).
Thanx and cheers
Simon
--
You received
during
this time?
Thanks,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thinking Sphinx group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/thinking-sphinx/-/5skq38P9ko0J.
To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx
other than default_delta.rb.
Any ideas what the issue might be?
Thanks,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thinking Sphinx group.
To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
with 2.0.4,
where I think the latest ts-delayed-delta required = 2.0.
So once I sorted out what worked with Rails 2, and what versions of
dependencies these needed, everything got up and running. Hopefully
this will help out somebody else trying to get this going on Rails 2.
Cheers,
Simon
On Mar 10, 9
Clever. Thanks for the help!
Simon
On Jan 13, 2:33 am, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote:
Hi Simon
Sphinx has no concept of searching for empty fields. I think a better option
would be to add an attribute indicating whether the specific column is blank:
has LENGTH(body) 0
?
Thanks,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thinking Sphinx group.
To post to this group, send email to thinking-sph...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
thinking-sphinx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options
Yeah, I think so. It has over 1.5 GBs and I have the mem_limit set to
256M.
Simon
On Dec 23, 3:36 am, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote:
Does the VM have enough RAM? I'm running out of suggestions for the cause to
be honest. And I don't have any similar sized datasets on hand
or not. If not, then
this definitely feels too slow. What machine are you running this on? And
does the speed improve if you remove body from the index definition?
--
Pat
On 20/12/2010, at 12:38 AM, Simon wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. Not sure what you mean about the columns .
They are columns
at the
default value, in 100,000 blocks, and with the huge value to try and
get all the values at once. I thought it seemed pretty slow too,
considering there are no joins or anything like that happening.
Thanks again,
Simon
On Dec 19, 2:33 am, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote:
Hi Simon
?
Thanks,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thinking Sphinx group.
To post to this group, send email to thinking-sph...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
thinking-sphinx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options
Whoops, nevermind. Apparently I completely overlooked the fact that
its only min_word_len, and not min_word_length, every time I looked at
what I had written in my config file.
On Dec 17, 10:35 am, Simon simon.wilkin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is the sphinx min_word_length option supported
other people. Does anybody have any suggestions for
what I could do to improve the performance, or any comments on the
speed of the indexing compared to what they have seen?
Thanks,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thinking Sphinx group
/freelancing-god/thinking-sphinx.git I was getting
back the error Plugin not found: [git://github.com/freelancing-god/
thinking-sphinx.git]. Perhaps the tarball wasn't updated to the
latest version?
Simon
On May 16, 10:09 pm, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote:
Hi Simon
Ideally the boolean
that the UI hangs when an entry is created/
modified, as the delta indexing is being done. Is there a way to push
this to a background or asynchronous process so that it doesn't
interfere with the UI rendering?
Thanks,
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
it to be an attribute, and now it behaves
perfectly. Thanks!
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thinking Sphinx group.
To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx@googlegroups.com
18 matches
Mail list logo