[ts] Re: disabling '|' (OR) and '-' (NOT) clauses in the search string

it to be an attribute, and now it behaves perfectly. Thanks! Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Thinking Sphinx group. To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx@googlegroups.com

[ts] delta indexing on demand?

that the UI hangs when an entry is created/ modified, as the delta indexing is being done. Is there a way to push this to a background or asynchronous process so that it doesn't interfere with the UI rendering? Thanks, Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received

[ts] Re: delta indexing on demand?

/freelancing-god/thinking-sphinx.git I was getting back the error Plugin not found: [git://github.com/freelancing-god/ thinking-sphinx.git]. Perhaps the tarball wasn't updated to the latest version? Simon On May 16, 10:09 pm, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote: Hi Simon Ideally the boolean

[ts] min_word_length

? Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Thinking Sphinx group. To post to this group, send email to thinking-sph...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to thinking-sphinx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options

[ts] Re: min_word_length

Whoops, nevermind. Apparently I completely overlooked the fact that its only min_word_len, and not min_word_length, every time I looked at what I had written in my config file. On Dec 17, 10:35 am, Simon simon.wilkin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is the sphinx min_word_length option supported

[ts] normal indexing speed?

other people. Does anybody have any suggestions for what I could do to improve the performance, or any comments on the speed of the indexing compared to what they have seen? Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Thinking Sphinx group

[ts] Re: normal indexing speed?

at the default value, in 100,000 blocks, and with the huge value to try and get all the values at once. I thought it seemed pretty slow too, considering there are no joins or anything like that happening. Thanks again, Simon On Dec 19, 2:33 am, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote: Hi Simon

[ts] Re: normal indexing speed?

or not. If not, then this definitely feels too slow. What machine are you running this on? And does the speed improve if you remove body from the index definition? -- Pat On 20/12/2010, at 12:38 AM, Simon wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reply.  Not sure what you mean about the columns . They are columns

[ts] Re: normal indexing speed?

Yeah, I think so. It has over 1.5 GBs and I have the mem_limit set to 256M. Simon On Dec 23, 3:36 am, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote: Does the VM have enough RAM? I'm running out of suggestions for the cause to be honest. And I don't have any similar sized datasets on hand

[ts] searching for empty fields

? Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Thinking Sphinx group. To post to this group, send email to thinking-sph...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to thinking-sphinx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options

[ts] Re: searching for empty fields

Clever. Thanks for the help! Simon On Jan 13, 2:33 am, Pat Allan p...@freelancing-gods.com wrote: Hi Simon Sphinx has no concept of searching for empty fields. I think a better option would be to add an attribute indicating whether the specific column is blank:   has LENGTH(body) 0

[ts] delayed_delta not found

other than default_delta.rb. Any ideas what the issue might be? Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Thinking Sphinx group. To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

[ts] Re: delayed_delta not found

with 2.0.4, where I think the latest ts-delayed-delta required = 2.0. So once I sorted out what worked with Rails 2, and what versions of dependencies these needed, everything got up and running. Hopefully this will help out somebody else trying to get this going on Rails 2. Cheers, Simon On Mar 10, 9

[ts] should the ts:dd rake task keep running while re-indexing

during this time? Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Thinking Sphinx group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/thinking-sphinx/-/5skq38P9ko0J. To post to this group, send email to thinking-sphinx

[ts] New additions not appearing in search results

y have any ideas what might be happening here, or any other suggestions for what I can try? Thanks, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a

Re: [ts] New additions not appearing in search results

params[:criteria], :with => filters, :sort_mode => :extended, :order => order Thanks again, Simon On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 07:29:36 UTC-5, Pat Allan wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > I guess the first place I’d start is by verifying the number of records > you’re expecting Sphin

Re: [ts] New additions not appearing in search results

urn my attention to non-sphinx issues. Thanks again Pat for taking the time to respond, and for getting me thinking about some different possibilities. It's greatly appreciated! Cheers, Simon On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 07:47:18 UTC-5, Pat Allan wrote: > > Hmm, this is certainly an odd one! Is

[ts] How to handle multiple databases for multi tenancy using apartment gem

is implemented using apartment and a subdomain matcher. You can find current code in the tenancy branch of Bookyt (https://github.com/huerlisi/bookyt/tree/tenancy). Installation docs (INSTALL.textile might be a little out of date regarding tenancy, just ping me). Thanx and cheers Simon -- You received