Re: [Thunar-dev] Ejecting USB flash drives
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 17:42:49 +0100, Harald Judt wrote: Hi, Since thunar switched to udev, the unmount action has been replaced with an eject action which unfortunately removes the drive from the list in the left-pane menu. I do not want that; I want the USB flash drive in my list as long as it is physically attached to the computer. Eject is wrong here anyway, you can't eject it like you can a CD or DVD. How can I revert this annoying behaviour? @thunar-dev: If this is only possible via patching the sources, I'm very willing to do it this way. I HAL times, thunar gathered the eject capability from HAL and used it if the HAL entry had it set. So to enable/disable the eject entry you had to change/add according entries in a HAL fdi file. I don't know how it currently works, but maybe a similar interface exists that just needs to be adjusted to your needs. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] Ejecting USB flash drives
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 20:22:20 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 17:42:49 +0100, Harald Judt wrote: Hi, Since thunar switched to udev, the unmount action has been replaced with an eject action which unfortunately removes the drive from the list in the left-pane menu. I do not want that; I want the USB flash drive in my list as long as it is physically attached to the computer. Eject is wrong here anyway, you can't eject it like you can a CD or DVD. How can I revert this annoying behaviour? @thunar-dev: If this is only possible via patching the sources, I'm very willing to do it this way. I HAL times, thunar gathered the eject capability from HAL and used it if the HAL entry had it set. So to enable/disable the eject entry you had to change/add according entries in a HAL fdi file. I don't know how it currently works, but maybe a similar interface exists that just needs to be adjusted to your needs. I found eject related settings in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.freedesktop.udisks.policy: action id=org.freedesktop.udisks.drive-eject [...] defaults allow_anyno/allow_any allow_inactiveno/allow_inactive allow_activeyes/allow_active /defaults /action Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] thunar-volman ported to udev/GIO
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:14:54 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote: What you need to test these changes is the jannis/port-to-udev branch of Thunar and the branch with the same name of thunar-volman. Enjoy! Does this work with xfce 4.6, or only with 4.7? Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] Thunar disturbs hard disk spindown
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 13:17:50 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: Hi, sometimes I notice that a process called thunar-vfs-mime causes my hard disk to spin up, according to the kernel log after echo 1 /proc/sys/vm/block_dump: 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3269093 (applications) on dm-5 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3268654 (defaults.list.CEFS6U) on dm-5 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): WRITE block 107040736 on dm-5 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3268657 (?) on dm-5 2010-01-26_12:12:15.71294 Spinning up /dev/sda after 4 minutes. 7flush-254:4(1196): WRITE block 455352 on dm-4 2010-01-26_12:13:15.71760 Spinning down /dev/sda. Minor addition: the PID changes each time, so it seems to be triggered by some other service. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
[Thunar-dev] Thunar disturbs hard disk spindown
Hi, sometimes I notice that a process called thunar-vfs-mime causes my hard disk to spin up, according to the kernel log after echo 1 /proc/sys/vm/block_dump: 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3269093 (applications) on dm-5 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3268654 (defaults.list.CEFS6U) on dm-5 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): WRITE block 107040736 on dm-5 7thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3268657 (?) on dm-5 2010-01-26_12:12:15.71294 Spinning up /dev/sda after 4 minutes. 7flush-254:4(1196): WRITE block 455352 on dm-4 2010-01-26_12:13:15.71760 Spinning down /dev/sda. I use Debian Sid with the following versions: ii libthunar-vfs-1-2 1.0.1-2 ii thunar 1.0.1-2 ii thunar-data 1.0.1-2 ii thunar-thumbnailers 0.4.1-2 ii thunar-volman 0.3.80-3 Is this just a misconfiguration, or a bug? Usually, the HD keeps spinned down for 30-80 minutes. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] Opened Thunar window makes mount.ntfs-3g consume too much CPU time.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 21:02:40 +0200, v...@ukr.net wrote: On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:01:15 +0100 Nick Schermer nickscher...@gmail.com wrote: Stop hijacking threads on the ml, but report bugs or start a new thread. Thanks, Nick Ok. If the thing I wrote about is a different problem - here is a separate thread. :) Hint: A reply to another mail doesn't start a new thread just because you change the subject. You mail is still marked as being the answer to another mail (look into the References: and In-Reply-To: headers of your mail). Only writing a _new_ mail (an not replying to another mail) starts a new thread. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] Ownership of auto-mounted devices
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 16:35:51 +1000, Jonathan Hepburn wrote: [...] Could someone please point me in approximately the right direction, if not just tell me the solution? Where is the ownership of removable devices decided? I think to fix this, a few more defails are required. How exactly is the HD mounted? Through in-kernel ntfs or with fuse and ntfs3g? Could you post the output of the mount command after you plugged in the HD? Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to apply actions to multiple files
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 18:48:43 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:25:12 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to know how to apply a custom action to multiple selected files. In this case, I have photos from my camera, which need to be rotated manually if taken in portrait orientation (no builtin sensor). I tried the custom actions, but they don't seem to work if more than one file is selected. Is there a different way to do this? Regards, Tino Hi Tino, You can use something like this in the custom action config: #Name: Convert Image #Description: Create special new image(s) #Command: x-terminal-emulator -e /usr/share/pct-thunar-scripts/scripts/convert-image %F #Patterns: * #Image Files: True As I wrote above, I already tried to add a custom action, which looked pretty much like the one you suggested (unless I miss the point). But it's useless, as it is not present in the context menu if I select more than one file. Or am I doing something wrong? remove the current custom action thunar -q to kill current thunar add custom action make use to use * as patterns en true for image file check thunar -q to kill the current thunar and restart and test the custom action. I repeated this (actually, it was the same I tried before, without the thunar -q calls), but got the same result. The custom action is visible when 1 file is selected, but not visible if 2 files are selected, so it is useless for my task. At least I don't see the entry in the context menu. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] eject usb-harddrive
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 15:33:11 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: [...] Anyways, I think that it could be sufficient as a workaround to: - either have a customised action in thunar only be applied to this specific drive and spinning it down - or trying to hack whatever function is used by thunar to eject media like usb-harddrives so that it would not just unmount but also spindown the drive. Forgot to ask one thing: do you have an eject button for your drive, or only unmount? The Xfce 4.4.2 release was somewhat buggy regarding the detection of removable media and providing the eject funktion in the GUI. If you only see unmount in the context menu of the drive, you could try exo-eject in the command line to see if that works for you. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] eject usb-harddrive
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 16:30:10 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: [...] As mentioned above, I do see the eject button. Anyways, I tried exo-eject to see whether this would give me a more comprehensive error message, well here it is (the command I ran was exo-eject -h SAME_AS_BELOW -e): Failed to eject /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_serial_WD_1200BEVExternal_575845333037343330353232_0_0. No property info.interfaces on device with id /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_serial_WD_1200BEVExternal_575845333037343330353232_0_0. Could you post the output of lshal while the drive is attached and mounted? Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] eject usb-harddrive
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 20:22:18 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: [...] Tried sudo eject -v /dev/wdpassport with the output that the eject succeeded. (see the full output here: http://pastebin.org/32834) Anyhow, when I unplugged the usb-cable (that is also powering the hdd) it made this awful sound described in the bugreport mentioned earlier. So it seems eject simply doesn't spin down the harddrive. Should it? From theory, if you use eject -s, eject sends a START STOP UNIT command, which should spin it down. I'll try to check it myself tomorrow. Btw., I attached an example fdi file for my card reader, to add the requires_eject property. Maybe HAL does the right thing if you adopt it to your hard disk and copy it to /etc/hal/fdi/policy (check with lshal if it is really set) and then use exo-eject. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] ThunarVFS, volumes and pathes
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:09:03 +0100, Christophe Chapuis wrote: Well, looks like I've partially found why my problem occurs... It looks like when I'm listing all the known volumes and ask for they mount path, it returns me pathes like file:///media/sda1, file:///media/sda2, ..., the volume being mounted or not. Therefore I understand that as a consequence thunar_vfs_volume_manager_get_volume_by_info doesn't work well. I don't have any idea where it did take that sort of path, it's not at all like that in my fstab, for example. thunar can also do automatic mounts (thunar-volman), without fstab entries. The mount path is /media/some label, so it seems to fill in the path that is used for automatic mounts. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] Problem with thumbnails
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:16:50 -0500, Erik Harrison wrote: On Feb 17, 2008 6:37 AM, Erlend Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hehe, high-performance and large images? It is possible to load and store thumbnails inside the EXIF data AFAIK. I imagine large JPEGs will sometimes have that. The thumbnailer could check for that and fail otherwise. Most images produced by a digital camera will have a thumbnail stored in the exiv data (it's the same thumbnail the camera uses to display the image on the LCD). Thunar already extracts those (this came in 0.8.0, and gives very good performance). Or, the thumbnailer should gracefully fail when overwhelmed, and let Thunar use the generic icon for that mime type. Well the problem is how to tell when you're overwhelmed? Difference people have difference ideas of when a thumbnailer should and shouldn't run... I think most people would say don't run if it's going to use swap space, I would say don't run if it's going to adversely affect the apparent responsiveness of the operating environment. If you're running a remote filesystem (fusesmb / sshfs) then the file-sizes which are safe to thumbnail change dramatically. Which is why I wasn't arguing for a constant file size. I figured a simple timeout would scale nicely. Thunar could also set a memory limit to the thumbnailer process (via ulimit or similar), so that the thumbnailer process is killed if it starts eating too much memory. Thunar woulld have to find out the hosts memory size to calculate a sensible limit, though. IMHO a fixed value would not work well here to satify all users. Another idea is a config item where the user can set a maximum size for the thumbnailer process. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:36:04 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch. Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well. Are there patches against 4.4.2? http://thunar.xfce.org/download/sources/Thunar/0.9.0/Thunar-0.9.0-use-eject-where-necessary.patch I think that Yves-Alexis asked for an official patch for xfdesktop4. My version can be found here: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3738 Brian already commented it[1], and I use it for several weeks now on 2 computers. Regards, Tino [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/thunar-dev@xfce.org/msg03506.html ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 18:36:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:22:34PM +, Tino Keitel wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:36:04 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch. Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well. Are there patches against 4.4.2? http://thunar.xfce.org/download/sources/Thunar/0.9.0/Thunar-0.9.0-use-eject-where-necessary.patch I think that Yves-Alexis asked for an official patch for xfdesktop4. My version can be found here: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3738 Brian already commented it[1], and I use it for several weeks now on 2 computers. You'll be glad, Simon Huggins just uploaded an xfdesktop with your patch :) By the way (and this is a new thread I guess), for some devices it's ok to have eject and umount. The only one I'm thinking of is RW CD/DVD where if the I noticed that xfdesktop4 and thunar behaved differently in this case and asked what I should implement, see http://www.mail-archive.com/thunar-dev@xfce.org/msg03504.html and Brian's reply. Changing both to show Eject _and_ Unmount is easy, though. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 19:40:22 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 18:36:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:22:34PM +, Tino Keitel wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:36:04 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch. Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well. Are there patches against 4.4.2? http://thunar.xfce.org/download/sources/Thunar/0.9.0/Thunar-0.9.0-use-eject-where-necessary.patch I think that Yves-Alexis asked for an official patch for xfdesktop4. My version can be found here: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3738 Brian already commented it[1], and I use it for several weeks now on 2 computers. You'll be glad, Simon Huggins just uploaded an xfdesktop with your patch :) By the way (and this is a new thread I guess), for some devices it's ok to have eject and umount. The only one I'm thinking of is RW CD/DVD where if the I noticed that xfdesktop4 and thunar behaved differently in this case and asked what I should implement, see http://www.mail-archive.com/thunar-dev@xfce.org/msg03504.html and Wrong mail. I mean this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/thunar-dev@xfce.org/msg03496.html Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:18:46 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 15:44:36 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch. Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well. I patched xfdesktop in a minimal way (see the attachment), which lead to the following inconsistency: In thunar, either Eject or Unmount is shown in the menu, depending on thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable(). In xfdesktop, both Eject and Unmount are shown when thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable() returns true. What behaviour should be preferred? Eject. Feel free to cook up a patch, open a bug on bugzilla, and attach it. Done. Hi Brian, what do you think about the patch? It does not hurry for Xfce itself, but the Debian maintainers wait for a comment to decide if this fix can be included in the 4.4.2 build for Debian. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:16:11 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote: [...] P.S. Also, what happens for the Floppy Drive icon? Sounds pretty confusing to have an Eject menu item that -- physically -- appears to do nothing (unless you're on an old Mac). When your floppy device HAL entry contains requires_eject, then Thunar will create an Eject menu entry. So when the hardware doesn't support eject, but HAL reports it, then HAL is wrong, not Xfce. :-) Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
[Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
Hi, the changelog for Thunar 0.9.0 mentions this: --- Use the correct HAL property to determine whether a given volume or device requires eject (Bug #3119). --- As I wasn't aware that #3119 was already fixed in SVN, I opened #3466 and created my own fix. It asks HAL for the eject flag: + /* an eject menu entry is shown if this returns true */ + volume_hal-eject = libhal_drive_requires_eject (hd); The SVN changeset for revision 25647 shows that Benny did it in the same way: + /* check if the drive requires eject */ + volume_hal-requires_eject = libhal_drive_requires_eject (hd); However, all the devices that previously had an eject button in the context menu don't have it anymore with 4.4.2. I checked the lshal output and the eject property is still there for the device: storage.requires_eject = true (bool) I noticed that the changes done by Benny use a function thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable(), whereas I just modified thunar_vfs_volume_is_disc() to return true for devices with the eject flag. I assume that the new eject feature in 4.4.2 is tested and working, I just don't know _how_ it works. Can anyone enlighten me what I have to do to get the eject button back for my iPod, card reader etc.? Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:29:24 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: [...] Hm, there seems to be an error in thunar-shortcuts-view.c. The Eject Volume action is only added for discs. Try the attached patch. Thanks for the quick reply, I'll try the patch and report back. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:29:24 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: [...] Hm, there seems to be an error in thunar-shortcuts-view.c. The Eject Volume action is only added for discs. Try the attached patch. While looking at the source, I wondered if the same patch is necessary for thunar-tree-view.c, too. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch. Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well. I patched xfdesktop in a minimal way (see the attachment), which lead to the following inconsistency: In thunar, either Eject or Unmount is shown in the menu, depending on thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable(). In xfdesktop, both Eject and Unmount are shown when thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable() returns true. What behaviour should be preferred? Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 00:38:55 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
Tino Keitel wrote:
I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane
without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch.
Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well.
I patched xfdesktop in a minimal way (see the attachment), which lead
Forgot the attachment.
Here it is.
Regards,
Tino
diff -ru xfdesktop4-4.4.2.orig/src/xfdesktop-volume-icon.c xfdesktop4-4.4.2/src/xfdesktop-volume-icon.c
--- xfdesktop4-4.4.2.orig/src/xfdesktop-volume-icon.c 2007-11-17 20:31:41.0 +0100
+++ xfdesktop4-4.4.2/src/xfdesktop-volume-icon.c 2007-12-11 22:14:46.005592273 +0100
@@ -573,8 +573,7 @@
icon);
}
-if(thunar_vfs_volume_is_disc(volume)
-thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable(volume))
+if(thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable(volume))
{
mi = gtk_image_menu_item_new_with_mnemonic(_(E_ject Volume));
gtk_widget_show(mi);
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 15:44:36 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote: Tino Keitel wrote: I can confirm that I have no Eject button in the shortcuts pane without the patch, and and Eject button with the patch. Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well. I patched xfdesktop in a minimal way (see the attachment), which lead to the following inconsistency: In thunar, either Eject or Unmount is shown in the menu, depending on thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable(). In xfdesktop, both Eject and Unmount are shown when thunar_vfs_volume_is_ejectable() returns true. What behaviour should be preferred? Eject. Feel free to cook up a patch, open a bug on bugzilla, and attach it. Done. Btw., the 4.4.2 version is missing in Bugzilla. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] How to use the eject function
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:18:46 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: Done. It's bug #3738. ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
Re: [Thunar-dev] backup files
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:55:36 +, Erlend Davidson wrote: [...] Wow - that's cool! Would it be possible to filter files by pattern too (I think this would be more useful). I already thought about this, too. But no time to implement it, yet. Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
[Thunar-dev] no responses to thunar bugs
Hi, one month ago I started to submit thunar related patches to bugzilla.xfce.org (2856, 3038, 3466). I got no response for any of them. Even if the developers think that the patches are totally crap (some of them are merely intended as a quick fix, so that it works for me), I'd like to get such a comment, so I can try to improve them. I also reported an issue on the xfce mailing list and was asked to open a bug for it. So I did, I also submitted a fix for the bug. Later I discovered that the same problem was already fixed in SVN trunk. So for me the lack of response already lead to a waste of time by fixing things that are already fixed. Is there a better way to get a response for thunar related patches than bugzilla.xfce.org? Regards, Tino ___ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@xfce.org http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
