[tw5] Re: BASIC Anywhere Machine: New SetClipboardText() function, etc.

2022-01-22 Thread Charlie Veniot
URL to this GG post: https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/uZmJpLsFehc On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 12:04:00 AM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote: > Work on the Programmer's Reference > > TiddlyWiki > continues. > > Attached:

[tw5] BASIC Anywhere Machine: New SetClipboardText() function, etc.

2022-01-22 Thread Charlie Veniot
Work on the Programmer's Reference TiddlyWiki continues. Attached: current list of enhancements to the BASIC implementation. Noteworthy addition: SetClipboardText(*string*) This was a quick and easy function to add, allowing

[tw5] Re: Dynamic class

2022-01-22 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
``` We need to see more of your code. Syntax like $something$ only works inside a macro. So what are the parameters of the macro? And how is the macro called? Likewise, a notation like <> represents a macro or variable, which has to be defined. If you have such a variable, how is it defined?

[tw5] Dynamic class

2022-01-22 Thread Thomas Schnetzer
Hello I try to make a tabs with a dynamic changeable class tc-vertical and tc-horizontal. I tried many things the simplest are this two but they didn't work. The $tName$ works but class seems to use another render path. <$macrocall $name="tabs" tabsList="""[tag[$tName$]nsort[order]]"""

Re: [tw5] Re: dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread Charlie Veniot
Simply stated: use a Google Form (or something similar) to submit bugs. - Cognitively and in terms of sensory-overload, Github is brutal in general, but especially when one is dealing with a cognitive disability. I can't offer up suggestions on how to change the Github interface,

Re: [tw5] Re: dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Charlie > I often say "first things first, consider upgrading", but 5.2.1 has the same > issue. So I say stick with what you have if it is working no-worse than the > latest. The problem is that the OP is using the macro "templatename" as an attribute value in the

[tw5] Re: dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread Charlie Veniot
*Good stuff !* I often say "first things first, consider upgrading", but 5.2.1 has the same issue. So I say stick with what you have if it is working no-worse than the latest. As for bug-reporting, that, to me, is a crappy process that needs some tender loving care, including a need to

[tw5] Re: dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread CarloGgi
It worked like a charm, thanks! If it is really a bug, is there a dedicated place to submit it for analysis? My TW version is 5.2.0 Thanks again and regards, CG On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:57:46 PM UTC+2 cj.v...@gmail.com wrote: > TiddlyTalk is a pain. Let me try pasting that code

[tw5] Re: dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread Charlie Veniot
TiddlyTalk is a pain. Let me try pasting that code again so that it shows okay over there. ``` <$button> <$action-createtiddler $basetitle="testTiddler" $template={{{ [[BASENAME-]addsuffix{!!grammar_class}] }}} > <$action-navigate

[tw5] Re: dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread Charlie Veniot
I'm thinking you found a bug related to how the action-createtiddler handles the $template parameter. In the meantime (i.e. until there is a fix or somebody can explain this "feature" going on) ... The following seems to work A-1 for me in my testing (ignore the "pre" tags): <$button>

[tw5] dynamically building a string by concatenation in a macro

2022-01-22 Thread CarloGgi
hallo folks, i need to feed the $template parameter of an <$action-createtiddler> widget with the correct template tiddler's name. The latter has a fixed part 'BASENAME' and a parameterized (or variable) suffix, which is choosen by means of a <$select> input. The idea is to have a macro build

[tw5] Re: Chinese characters in Stroll doesn't work well

2022-01-22 Thread David Gifford
Hi fh hf! Welcome to TiddlyWiki / Stroll! I think this is caused by Tiddlywiki's minimum length for search strings. I think if you go into $:/config/Search/MinLength in the shadow tiddlers and reduce 3 to 2 or 1 you will solve this problem. But it also means searching could take longer. When