[tw5] Re: [TW5] How to Transclude all tiddlers with a tag

2020-06-10 Thread Geoff Tothill
UTC+1, Eric Shulman wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 1:01:07 PM UTC-7, Geoff Tothill wrote: >> >> It works perfectly, but I have discovered a problem with my grand plan, >> which I should have predicted. >> Many of the tags are repeated in the new tiddler,

[tw5] Re: [TW5] How to Transclude all tiddlers with a tag

2020-06-09 Thread Geoff Tothill
UTC+1, Eric Shulman wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 6:05:05 AM UTC-7, Geoff Tothill wrote: >> >> I need to transclude a relatively large number of tiddlers and display >> the tags in the transcluded content wrapped in their graphical form >> (lozenges). >&g

[tw5] Re: [TW5] How to Transclude all tiddlers with a tag

2020-06-09 Thread Geoff Tothill
:31 PM UTC+1, Eric Shulman wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 6:05:05 AM UTC-7, Geoff Tothill wrote: >> >> I need to transclude a relatively large number of tiddlers and display >> the tags in the transcluded content wrapped in their graphical form >> (lozenges).

[tw5] Re: [TW5] How to Transclude all tiddlers with a tag

2020-06-09 Thread Geoff Tothill
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this thread - it seems popular! I have a slightly different requirement if anyone can help me with it. I need to transclude a relatively large number of tiddlers and display the tags in the transcluded content wrapped in their graphical form (lozenges).

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki on SharePoint - Real world Application

2020-06-09 Thread Geoff Tothill
Hi Tony, I wondered how you were getting on with this project. I also had a need to use tiddlywiki on a corporate (read Office 365) SharePoint server and find in its current iteration it works pretty well. Im using stand alone tiddlywiki files renamed as .aspx and these launch in a full frame

[tw5] Re: TW5: just a <> search box

2020-05-17 Thread Geoff Tothill
Thanks Matt, Much appreciated. My mistake somewhere. I will revisit this afternoon. Have a good afternoon, Geoff. On Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 1:25:18 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > Geoff Tothill wrote: >> >> I made the change and this seems to give me 1 as the count despite the &

[tw5] Re: TW5: just a <> search box

2020-05-17 Thread Geoff Tothill
Thanks Matt, I made the change and this seems to give me 1 as the count despite the number of actual results returned :-( Thanks for looking that this, G On Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 11:58:36 AM UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > Geoff > > Since that was written, new filter ops have been added, including th

[tw5] Re: TW5: just a <> search box

2020-05-17 Thread Geoff Tothill
Hi Jed / Dave, Sorry to resurrect this old thread, but its in regard to your code that allows a search box to be placed in a tiddler, which is very useful. I have installed your macro and all works as expected except for the number of matches indicator. I'm assuming it takes its value from this