Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Hi Riz > Is there a workaround to perform the search only when pressing the enter key > or something. No, not at present. But there’s nothing to stop anybody building an alternative search implementation that requires “enter” to trigger the search. > Also, will there be a similar solution for

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Hi Mark > > Will we be able to effectively turn this feature off by putting it something > like 100? Especially on a device, with a software keyboard, typing a wrong > character becomes overly expensive. I'd much rather check my work and have > the search begin after the phrase is right. By

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Will we be able to effectively turn this feature off by putting it something like 100? Especially on a device, with a software keyboard, typing a wrong character becomes overly expensive. I'd much rather check my work and have the search begin after the phrase is right. Thanks! Mark On

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Is there a workaround to perform the search only when pressing the enter key or something. Also, will there be a similar solution for the slow edit text fields? A work around will do too On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 14:06:52 UTC+5:30, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > I’ve pushed a fix to add a minimum

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

That does seem faster, Jeremy. Many thanks Jon On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:36:52 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > I’ve pushed a fix to add a minimum length threshold for the search field: > > https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/2603 > > New minlength operator committed in: > > >

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

I’ve pushed a fix to add a minimum length threshold for the search field: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/2603 New minlength operator committed in:

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Thanks for the replies - yes, I've definitely found that closing other browser tabs makes a big difference, so as suggested, I've got the TW open in a single tab in Firefox whilst Chrome is open for other stuff. Jon On Monday, 10 October 2016 17:53:10 UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Jon, > >

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Hi Jon, Afaik, there is a "refresh" delay for each keypress only after which TiddlyWiki goes to fetch results. If there isn't such a delay, then this needs to be implemented immediately. There's this ticket, but I'm almost certain it is more or less unresolved: *refresh delay for text input

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Ciao Jon Its worth mentioning some factors involved ... - as you mention, power of computer - size of file (but see below) - the browser you are using and its configuration FYI over time there have been several tests of "capacity" of TW and its performance is not as simple as a

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Hi Mark, most of the images are in an external directory - it must be the lack of indexing that's the issue (and presumably OneNote has that) Jon On Monday, 10 October 2016 00:29:48 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > 10 Mb or so is where I expect to hit the wall, though others are more > tolerant or

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

10 Mb or so is where I expect to hit the wall, though others are more tolerant or have much more powerful computers. What do you have in your TW that's racking it up to 10 Mb? If you have images, the best thing to do is to export them to external files in a subdirectory. I look at the

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

Hi Mark, My TW is 9Mb. Search is still slow with the recent tab closed but I'll try it on the desktop at work to see how much of the lag is due to the computer. Jon On Sunday, 9 October 2016 20:44:02 UTC+1, Jon wrote: > > Hi, > > I use OneNote at work and find the search facility to be

[tw] Re: [TW5] Search lag

How big is your TW? There is no real indexing in TW, so the larger the file, the slower it's going to be. On a desktop computer, searches in my 5Mb TW are nearly instantaneous. I also use an older tablet to search Bible (6 Mb) references. The slowness is noticeable, but acceptable. The main