Fully agree. Good points & examples.
On Thursday, 11 June 2020 21:06:14 UTC+2, springer wrote:
>
> Just one more variable here, in terms of whether and when to individuate
> TW instances: AUDIENCE
>
> Many of my TW projects are already -- or may eventually be -- shared with
> a particular kind
Springer,
A most important consideration - who is the audience?. For many wikis it is
them-self, and the prior issues are important, but anything planed for the
bigger world the scope is often easy to define.
Thanks for making this important point.
This aspect could possible be broken down
Just one more variable here, in terms of whether and when to individuate TW
instances: AUDIENCE
Many of my TW projects are already -- or may eventually be -- shared with a
particular kind of audience (often students in a course, but not always). I
have one catch-all wiki for all the personal
>
> I support multi wikis! In my opinion like a word processor you should have
> different docs for different purposes!
I agree that one way to conceive a wiki is as a "document" in the same way
a word processor does. But many mental other models work too! For instance
your very own Tiddler
While maintaining several wikis is a little cumbersome, but I support multi
wikis! In my opinion like a word processor you should have different docs
for different purposes! Use the searchwikis plugin to have a central wiki
then!
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:48 AM Michael
I'm sure this has come up before, but what are the downsides to keeping one
large wiki vs. several smaller ones? I mostly use mine as a sort of
commonplace book and have two wikis, one that is related to work (technical
stuff + project notes) and the other that is everything else of interest.
6 matches
Mail list logo
