Thank you all.
The reason is you could then write wiki text to turn the contents of any
field name with -link into a link by the prefixes name
Great tip.
I decided to use source-url, source-book, source-person, depending on from
where I collected the note.
--
You received this message
talha131 and PMario
"source" is fine to use as you need in most tiddlers. It has special
meaning, I believe, in plugins only (PMario?)
The TW ADVICE is ...
*source = The source URL associated with a tiddler*
You can interpret this liberally. For instance, I have use it not for URLs,
but
Hi,
There is only 1 field that you have to use to create a valid tiddler. The
"title". That's it.
Every other field name is just a convention.
https://tiddlywiki.com/#TiddlerFields shows all fields that are used by
core tiddlers.
As far as I know, It's OK to use source. Especially as you
This answer lays with yourself.
Perhaps fine if your not editing the plugin Tiddler.
However can I suggest source-link
The reason is you could then write wiki text to turn the contents of any
field name with -link into a link by the prefixes name
E.g. source is the title of a link stored in
Though I could not find official documentation, but it seems source field
has special usage in TW.
For example, this edition uses source field for creating a hierarchy of
tiddlers.
http://tw5.scholars.tiddlyspot.com/
It is also used for the source URL of a plugin.
(optional) Source URL of
5 matches
Mail list logo
