Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

The only actually core code is in bootprefix.js and boot.js. Reminds me of Linux... :) On May 12, 2017 20:37, "Jeremy Ruston" wrote: > Hi Josiah > > > This may be a language difference. A "plugin" for me conjures up on > OPTIONAL feature to add-on, not a system. The

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Ciao Jeremy This may be a language difference. A "plugin" for me conjures up on OPTIONAL feature to add-on, not a system. The "core" may well share the same tiddler structure as the rest but it ALSO defines the structure of itself and the rest? Right? I think there is a meaningful difference.

[tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Thanks Jeremy and TiddlyTweeter for a good chuckle reading this thread. Reminded me of Alice in Wonderland: 'When I use a *word*,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it *means* just *what* I choose it to *mean* — neither more nor less.' It also made me wonder what the core plugs

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Jeremy So its NOT a plugin :-) Its the system itself. If so, WHY is it listed as a plugin? THAT I do not understand. Josiah > Jeremy Ruston replied ... > The same as if you took the engine out of your car, or cut the heart out of > an animal. > > Okay. But I can't switch it OFF. What

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Hi Josiah, Tiddlywiki is one single html file. You have seen lots of html files not being tiddlywiki. Clearly something is added to it to make it a tiddlywiki. Thinking about it that way it is an add-on. Birthe This may be a language difference. A "plugin" for me conjures up on > OPTIONAL

[tw] Re: doesn't seem to work

Thank you On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 3:14:30 PM UTC-5, codacoder...@outlook.com wrote: > > Watch your case: > > This works > > This does not > > > > On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 2:55:59 PM UTC-5, Thomas Schulte wrote: >> >> underlines in the wiki but tag doesn't stop underlining. What >>

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Hi Josiah > > This may be a language difference. A "plugin" for me conjures up on OPTIONAL > feature to add-on, not a system. The "core" may well share the same tiddler > structure as the rest but it ALSO defines the structure of itself and the > rest? Right? I think there is a meaningful

[tw] TiddlyFox - freshly installed - doesn't work anymore

Hi, My TiddlyWiki cannot be saved anymore with TiddlyFox installed. When I click the save button I'm prompted to save the file under a new name or open it in IE. I removed and reinstalled TiddlyFox but it didn't help. Windows 7 FireFox 53.0.2 (32-bit) What else can I post to help find the

[tw] Re: [TW5] From a formated date to a day, a month and a year ?

Imo you can throw almost any string at Date.parse() or "new Date" and convert it to a js date object. Which then can be used with the tw utility function. just some thought. -m -- You received

[tw] Re: [TW5] From a formated date to a day, a month and a year ?

Hi, I didn't find anything useful with the js date object. I think I'll end writing a js macro that find the index of "0DD" or "DD" in the format string and extract it from the date string. To get the month will be a bit more complicated as it can be a number or a name, but not so much. FrD

[tw] Re: TiddlyFox - freshly installed - doesn't work anymore

SORRY! One should read what Jeremy wrote in the Instructions for TiddlyFox ;) Now I found the "Big Blue Ball", followed the instructions (click it and allow saving) and now it works. Great stuff btw., Jeremy! I still love TiddlyWiki and already convinced several others. Unfortunately I have

[tw] Re: TiddlyFox - freshly installed - doesn't work anymore

Hi Stephan, Good job convincing others to use Tiddlywiki! You are greatly missed here, but we only have the time that we have. Birthe Den fredag den 12. maj 2017 kl. 08.47.44 UTC+2 skrev Stephan Hradek: > > SORRY! > > One should read what Jeremy wrote in the Instructions for TiddlyFox ;) > >

[tw] Re: TiddlyFox - freshly installed - doesn't work anymore

Ciao Stephen, don't feel in anyway bad. I think you are highlighting a common issue with software usage. We get used to a specific way it works. Even folk like you,with lots of experience of TW, can get slightly tripped up when it changes how it works. Stephan Hradek wrote: > > SORRY! > > One

[tw] Re: TiddlySmile ...

Well from the photo, it sure does not look like a tiddler to me. If it is in fact a tiddler, April Mackenzie, Oxford, Mississippi may have taken part in the test by April Mackenzie, Moscow, Scotland , who testet the taste of porridge. She did not like the taste herself so fed the tiddlers

[tw] Re: TiddlySmile ...

B. You are right. That Tiddler is unnaturally LARGE. After intensive research I should perhaps, now, inform Ms. April Mackenzie of Oxford, Mississippi, she may be living a Radiation Zone? J. On Friday, 12 May 2017 18:45:55 UTC+2, Birthe C wrote: > > Well from the photo, it sure does not

Re: [tw] Announcing the 2nd TiddlyWiki European Meetup on 10th & 11th June 2017

I may not be able to come after all: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/us-ban-laptops-europe-flights On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:35:06 AM UTC-4, PMario wrote: > > hi folks, > > I'd really like to join you. .. but I booked my holiday trip at the same > time :/ > > have fun! > mario > -- You

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Hi Josiah >> On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 2:59:52 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> why is tiddlywiki CORE considered a plugin? There's no "considered" about it, the core of TiddlyWiki is a plugin called $:/core. It's the same as any other plugin, just a bundle of tiddlers. Best wishes Jeremy.

[tw] doesn't seem to work

underlines in the wiki but tag doesn't stop underlining. What can be done? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw] simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

why is tiddlywiki CORE considered a plugin? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

[tw] Re: doesn't seem to work

Watch your case: This works This does not On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 2:55:59 PM UTC-5, Thomas Schulte wrote: > > underlines in the wiki but tag doesn't stop underlining. What > can be done? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki"

[tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

I'd say Jeremy's choice here is the ultimate in dogfooding: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 2:59:52 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > why is tiddlywiki CORE considered a plugin? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

Ciao Jeremy Okay. But I can't switch it OFF. What would happen if I could? Josiah On Friday, 12 May 2017 22:29:21 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hi Josiah > > On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 2:59:52 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> why is tiddlywiki CORE considered a plugin? >> > > There's no

Re: [tw] Re: simple question: why is tiddlywiki core considered a plugin?

> > Ciao Jeremy > > Okay. But I can't switch it OFF. What would happen if I could? The same as if you took the engine out of your car, or cut the heart out of an animal. Best wishes Jeremy > > Josiah > >> On Friday, 12 May 2017 22:29:21 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> Hi Josiah >> On