Hi sini-Kit
That's my feeling -- not so much a limitation of the keep[] operator, but
deficiencies in filtering fields based upon existence/non-existence and
empty/non-empty value.
Perhaps another operator required here (or modifications to existing
operators)?
regards
On Wednesday, 24
I came here today to say THANKS for this plugin. I write scripts for my
podcast (http://www.coiledspring.org/) using TW5, and this plugin is great
for assembling the script using boilerplate bits like the intro, credits
and so on. I tweaked the styles to make the transclusion much more visible.
We can make two variants keep (witch work with all lists) and ekeep for
not intersection with empty lists. But it will not solve the problem in
TW5 with searching something empty. For example it was problem for me to
find all empty fields in the tiddler.
And I have to do something like that
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 9:28:54 PM UTC-8, Andrew wrote:
>
> ...
>
...
The HTML syntax for a checkbox does *not* have an "unchecked" attribute.
Also, for cross-browser compatibility, use a value of "checked"... not
"true". Thus:
and
-e
>
--
You received this message
Thank you all. Not sure what lingo-base() is for yet, and I have to make it
more readable, so if anyone wants to help with that it would be much
appreciated, but I ended up with:
\define lingo-base() $:/language/TiddlerInfo/
\define add() [[$(currentTiddler)$]]
\define remove()
Hmmm. Looking further down the code, I see you're running into the same
issue with the <$checkbox> widget, too. You won't be able to run your
<> and <> macros within the <$checkbox> widget. (I learned
this the hard way myself.)
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 4:24:52 PM UTC-8, Andrew wrote:
>
> I'm trying to add to the list field using the checkbox widget and can't
> figure out how to write it.
>
The $checkbox widget doesn't invoke action widgets like a $button does...
it only allows you to set/clear a field value or
Hi sini-Kit
The keep[] operator can be used for A intersect B -- in your usage you
wished for a special condition -- that an intersect with an empty set is
ignored (as you wished to simultaneously test fro the existence of the
field.)
Your modification to the keep[] operator works in this
Hi Andrew
The $checklist widget might meet your requirements -- the widget extends
the functionality of the $checkbox widget to handle lists in ordinary
fields and indexes. There is, therefore, no need to use the $listops
widget, provided that your requirement is only to toggle the value of
Hi, Andrew —
I think the problem stems from trying to pass a variable ($(currentTiddler)$)
into the <$action-listops> widget.
I'm not sure how to get around that using only core code — but if you
install Tobias's setvars plugin (
http://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins/#setvars ), you can use
Hello everyone,I'm trying to add to the list field using the checkbox widget
and can't figure out how to write it. Currently I have tried the following. But
it fails. Any suggestions?
\define add()
<$action-listops $tiddler="$:/plugin/ajh/format/list" $field="list"
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Yakov wrote:
Chris, could you please do the same for the current snapshot of
tiddlyweb.tiddlyspace.com?
I'll be moving the contents of that space to
https://tank.peermore.com/ sometime before the end of the year.
Much of the content in @tiddlyweb is formatted as markdown
My Tiddlywiki shop is not all I do. Today I try to make nice CSS styles
in TW5 blog which will look good for SEO in static variant
http://tiddlywikiblog.neocities.org/ (--rendertiddlers)
and easy to modify in tw5 variant
http://tiddlywikiblog.neocities.org/heeg.html
> That's totally
Hi Mark
Point taken on the plugins preview, then will add myself to waiting list.
But stil to know, will there be smth like IntelliTagger and YpurSearch in
the new plugins?
Thanks
Dan
In TW5, with filters you can use regular expressions, which gets you a long
way towards the features of
Would something like the resume edition with a longer output be useful?
Because what you want is possible and isn't too hard if you do it correctly.
You make a tiddler that will display your output with something like this
in the text field:
<$list filter='[tag[Section]sort[order]]'>
In TW5, with filters you can use regular expressions, which gets you a long
way towards the features of YourSearch (but not the javascript feature if
you're using that).
The built in tagger in TW5 is somewhat intelligent in that it presents a
list which then gets narrowed each time you type a
About #1, changing priorities is a lot easier if you set up a list with an
editable field. Here's something I use to remind about topics that I'm
currently interested in:
<$list filter="[tag[Current]sort[priority]]" >
<$edit-text
size="2" field="priority"/>
{{!!title}}
<$link
Hi Tobias;
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Tobias Beer wrote:
>
> 1) Please upgrade that wiki, its edit-template is still broken in your
> pre-release version.
>
> I do not clearly understand what you are talking about. You mean I should
step up to TW5 version 5.1.11 ?
While tiddlywiki is great for storing and linking information. But not so
great if you need to piece your information (tiddlers) together to a more
structured text.
*My objective here is to*: easily sort tiddlers in a custom order and export
is there a:
1. plug-in to help with this or
Hi Eric
Thank you for the comprehensive answer, really good to know what direction
to take :)
For my use case, I'm using TiddlyWiki classic with 2 essential plugins:
* YourSearch http://tiddlywiki.abego-software.de/#[[YourSearch%20Help]]
* IntelliTagger
Hi SiniKit,
> 1) I ask many questions in this group, and people (thanks them) waste lots
> of time explaining me something. So I want to show them the result of
> their answers.
>
Thanks, that's surely inspiring.
> 2) TW5 don't have some useful features, and it will be great if I see
21 matches
Mail list logo