[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

Thanks so much Eric, Just what I wanted to know. I assume as long as my tag pill inner is lower on the list of items tagged $:./tags/Macro then it will override the core? Such core macro overrides would be a useful thing, perhaps however we need a mechanism to indicate when this is occurring?

[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 4:35:25 PM UTC-7 TW Tones wrote: > I wanted to have a label on a tag-pill, rather then the tag name yet have > the same tag drop down. Can you suggest a method? Ideally without modifying > the macro? > Changing the tag-pill output will, of necessity, require

[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

Eric, This is an interesting reuse of the tag-pill macro. Thanks for sharing. The tag macro is not too well documented but seems to have a lot of possibilities/parameters, although not documented. For example I wanted to have a label on a tag-pill, rather then the tag name yet have the same

[tw5] Re: Does Relink add a new filter operator?

Si, Interesting discovery. I suppose in reality it has a quite specific function to list items that relink has under "rename management" that are "White listed" and exist on the current tiddler, for re-link to act on. See $:/plugins/flibbles/relink/ui/configuration/Fields - So I am

[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 9:04:25 AM UTC-7 mehequeda...@gmail.com wrote: > The action I want to run is navigation to a tiddler whose name is stored > in a field. I know how to make it work with a button: > \define actions() <$action-navigate $to={{!!source_type}}/> > <$button actions=<>>Click

[tw5] Re: How can you display a list at the click of a button?

miket... - Somewhat like what Soren says, but not quite: It doesn't look like you actually want to perform an "action" as it is meant in TW but rather just show and hide(?) a regular listing. For this, refer to the revealwidget , the "accordion" example,

[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

Just a guess but maybe this part {{!!source_type}} has lost its context (i.e the currentTiddler) and seeks for souce_type in the tag(-tiddler)? I.e what is currentTiddler in the action? One way to test is to add a source_type field in the tag-tiddler to see if it does navigate to there.

[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

It works fine for the button but not for the tag-pill. Anyway, hardcoding a concrete name is also not working: \define actions() <$action-navigate $to="Target"/> <$macrocall $name="tag-pill" tag={{!!source_type}} actions=<>/> On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 23:14:57 UTC+2 Mat wrote: > Just a guess

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki5, Raspberry Pi and Vim: A guide for the command line aficionado

Sorry for delay in response, my first attempt seemed not to get picked up by Google Groups. Anyway, I appreciate the reply; your set up sounds a lot more sophisticated. I too will use the new version as a prompt to see if I can refine how I'm doing this, nodemon is fine but definitely feels

[tw5] Does Relink add a new filter operator?

Relink adds a "Relink references" tab the info panel for a tiddler, which appears to show any fields, links, macros etc. that reference the current one. Looking at the template for this ( $:/plugins/flibbles/relink/ui/TiddlerInfo/ReferencesTemplate

[tw5] Re: Tag-pill as a button

I'm resurrecting this thread because it happens to me to be in the same situation: I want to make some tag-pill to execute some action. The action I want to run is navigation to a tiddler whose name is stored in a field. I know how to make it work with a button: \define actions()

[tw5] Re: Filter for cleaning the base, but keeping the basic settings.

I tried it doesn't fit. Since many records are not related to the system. It is necessary to do on the tag, I think so. For example, new buttons with the tag *$:/tags/SideBar*. This is not a system entry and it will disappear. вторник, 6 июля 2021 г. в 16:26:36 UTC+3, David Gifford: >

[tw5] Re: Filter for cleaning the base, but keeping the basic settings.

[!is[system]] in the filter tab of Advanced search. But make sure you don't have any regular tiddlers that are needed for your template (base). On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 5:58:04 AM UTC-5 miket...@gmail.com wrote: > Let's say I set everything up and want to make a new base. I want to > remove

[tw5] Filter for cleaning the base, but keeping the basic settings.

Let's say I set everything up and want to make a new base. I want to remove only information posts, but keep all my own customizations, CSS and plugins. Post with similar tags: $:/tags/Stylesheet CSS $:/tags/MenuBar $:/tags/SideBar ... etc Am I thinking right? Or is it possible to clear the

[tw5] Re: What's the issue with IDs again?

Ciao PMario I wanted to join Mat in saying that is a *great *reply. Very clarifying. For my own usage I would comment I have used IDs successfully BUT I do it within a single tiddler with transclusions where I want simple in Tiddler navigation. I always use unique IDs. The use case is an

[tw5] Re: Bob and keystrokes

uups forgot something, Clicking the [OK] button will work the other way around. Clone temp -> form and delete the temp. The edittext-widgets tiddler parameter will need to be a variable. ... depending on which tiddler is active atm. form or temp -m On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 8:06:28 AM UTC+2

[tw5] Re: Bob and keystrokes

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 4:29:30 AM UTC+2 Ed Heil wrote: > Thanks, TW, PMario. What defines a temporary tiddler for these > purposes? Being under $:/temp/ ? > Yes. ... It depends how your form looks like and how the tiddler you need looks like. I would define a view-mode for the form,