Can you tell me about Tiddlywiki, what is it used for? I made my account
here and honestly I have never known what it is for and what can be done
here.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Just tested. It works fine to me.
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 3:42:34 PM UTC-7 allench...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for sharing.
> I tried this version, however, it doesn't work on my tiddly wiki in 5.2.3,
> even though it updated recently.
> it seems like that the plugin support the
Thanks for sharing.
I tried this version, however, it doesn't work on my tiddly wiki in 5.2.3,
even though it updated recently.
it seems like that the plugin support the highest version in 5.1.22, but
not the latest version in 5.2.3
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:48:23 AM UTC-8 PMario wrote:
Hi,
https://flibbles.github.io/tw5-relink/
That's the latest version it shows >= v5.1.22 the build date is 6.Nov.2022
-m
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 6:21:28 PM UTC+1 allench...@gmail.com wrote:
> HI community,,
> I upgraded my tiddly wiki to the latest version 5.2.3. But as a depending
>
HI community,,
I upgraded my tiddly wiki to the latest version 5.2.3. But as a depending
user of Relink plugin, i'm not able to use that in this version of tiddly
wiki anymore. I checked the plugin official page, showing latest compatible
version of tiddly is 5.1.2. Does anyone have any ideas
Next on deck:
```
<>
```
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:20:27 AM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote:
> BTW, currently only works with tags that have no spaces in them.
>
> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:15:46 AM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote:
>
>> The "code" in the macro is not pretty to look at.
BTW, currently only works with tags that have no spaces in them.
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:15:46 AM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote:
> The "code" in the macro is not pretty to look at. I don't do pretty code
> until I've got proof of concept working.
>
> Proof of concept works (I think,
The "code" in the macro is not pretty to look at. I don't do pretty code
until I've got proof of concept working.
Proof of concept works (I think, proof in the pudding), so now I can
consider making pretty code.
If you want to play with the working "select * from *tag*" (a *tag* is a
Oops, still have a bug in there. On it.
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:39:46 AM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote:
> Okay, "nulls" handled, for this sample query, anyhoo.
>
> Must test with different "tables" (in what I'm doing, I'm using tags as
> the way to define virtual tables; a bit
9 matches
Mail list logo
