[tw] (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-22 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Hi All -- new TW5 user here. Really love the product so far. I've run into a behavior that might be a bug, or (more likely) me just not understanding the syntax. I'm trying to display a list of tiddlers by date created (not just modified). And it seems to me that the negation operator in

[tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-23 Thread Daniel Cunningham
But the syntax of your code is very different than that shown in the docs -- can you give guidance on this? Best, -- Daniel On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 4:22:50 PM UTC-8, PMario wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 11:48:49 PM UTC+1, Daniel Cunningham > wrote: >>

[tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-23 Thread Daniel Cunningham
ld$]]" > > > > <$view field="$dateField$" format="date" template="$format$"/> > <$list filter= > "[sameday:$dateField${!!$dateField$}!is[system]$subfilter$sort[$dateField$]]" > > > > <$link to={{!!title}}> >

[tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-23 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Sorry It was when I tried to add a comment above the macro that I threw the error. I need to study up on TW5 comment syntax. On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 11:15:35 PM UTC-8, Daniel Cunningham wrote: > > Uhhh, scratch the "leading whitespace fragility" question. I need to

[tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-23 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Uhhh, scratch the "leading whitespace fragility" question. I need to chase my own sloppiness down... :-) On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 10:34:03 PM UTC-8, Daniel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for that follow-up! I'm beginning to see (thanks to you and Ma

[tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-22 Thread Daniel Cunningham
the filter expression to > work your way. If you clone and modify, remember that you have to save and > refresh before the new macro will take effect. Also be sure to have a > backup of your TW file before you start. > > Good luck, > Mark > > On Wednesday, February 22, 201

Re: [tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-24 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Hi Mario, You are quite the gentleman! Rookie mistake on my part. Many thanks for spotting the error! Best regards, -- Daniel On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:00 AM, PMario wrote: > Hi, > > I think there is a typo. IMO it should be: > > \define

Re: [tw] Re: (TW5) Problem with operator on: subfilter:"sort[created]" ?

2017-02-24 Thread Daniel Cunningham
t's simply: "Dude. Whitespace matters." :-) And it's very much worth learning, because of the results (and power) it can give you. Thanks, Mario. -- Best regards, Daniel On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:25 AM, PMario <pmari...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, February 24, 201

[tw] [TW5] User interface for copy by value (vs reference) operations on singleton tiddlers

2017-03-20 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Hi All: I hope this is not going to be an embarrassing question. But I did search the docs and groups/forums to no avail, so here goes... I am trying to do a copy of a single tiddler from one local TW5 file to another. For example, an "action item" exists in a small "to-do list" TW5 wiki,

[tw] Re: [TW5] User interface for copy by value (vs reference) operations on singleton tiddlers

2017-03-22 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Thanks for your time on this Eric. I saw in the TW5 intro tiddlers that newbies like me can volunteer to update the docs and initiate git pull requests. So I'll try to do that soon, and add some of your instructions, and the other clarifications in this thread. It's what lesser minions like

[tw] Re: [TW5] User interface for copy by value (vs reference) operations on singleton tiddlers

2017-03-22 Thread Daniel Cunningham
opy, then drag it from the list in the 'open' > tab to the destination tidwiki > > all the best > BJ > > On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:48:09 PM UTC+1, Daniel Cunningham wrote: >> >> Hi All: >> >> I hope this is not going to be an embarrassing question.

[tw] Re: [TW5] User interface for copy by value (vs reference) operations on singleton tiddlers

2017-03-22 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Now, THAT (the inter-window tab-to-tab drag/drop) is a thing of beauty. That works SO well with my workflow. I'm getting misty-eyed. I'm serious -- that's awesome. Thanks so much! On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 3:33:46 PM UTC-7, Thomas Elmiger wrote: > > Hi > > It is also possible to perform a

Re: [tw] [TW5] User interface for copy by value (vs reference) operations on singleton tiddlers

2017-03-22 Thread Daniel Cunningham
gt; Hi Daniel > > On 20 Mar 2017, at 18:48, Daniel Cunningham <dan...@chintiminifarm.com > > wrote: > > To import the one tiddler from the source wiki took about 120 clicks, as I > had to disable all the tiddlers that I did not want to copy over. That's a > lot of clic

Re: [tw] Re: A TiddlyWiki Math(s) TextBook

2017-04-24 Thread Daniel Cunningham
I echo BJ's finding that the link is not working for me either. :-( I'm genuinely interested, but I think the frustration of several cycles of "thar she blows!" followed by "myuh, myuh, myuh..." is wearing thin. On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:40 AM, RichardWilliamSmith <

Re: [tw] Re: A TiddlyWiki Math(s) TextBook

2017-04-25 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Thanks, Richard -- this link works (the array of earlier ones didn't). At first glance... WOW! Something else. Kudos to you. I'll be teaching my two boys calculus this summer, and I may just chose this one. I believe that the non-linearity may really lend itseld to letting student learn the

[tw] Re: A TiddlyWiki Math(s) TextBook

2017-04-21 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Hi Richard, The moved dropbox link does not seem to be working. Can you re-post? On Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 2:40:40 PM UTC-7, Richard Smith wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > Sorry. I moved it into a sub-directory along with some others, the direct > link is now >

Re: [tw] Re: A TiddlyWiki Math(s) TextBook

2017-05-09 Thread Daniel Cunningham
interested folks to join in some > sharing & perhaps meeting about these ideas > > //steve. > > > On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 11:26:18 PM UTC-4, Daniel Cunningham wrote: >> >> Thanks, Richard -- this link works (the array of earlier ones didn't). >&g

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Host on github for free without any git knowledge or software installation

2017-11-23 Thread Daniel Cunningham
resulting wiki. > > Actually you may check these two results visiting the following pages > (accordingly): > >- https://protw.github.io/tw5/static >- https://protw.github.io/tw5 > > Sincerely, > > Olegh Bondarenko > http://goo.gl/bzDZfd > > > >

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Host on github for free without any git knowledge or software installation

2017-11-26 Thread Daniel Cunningham
2, 2.2.1 - 2.2.4). >>> >>> The way how to build the resulting wiki is determined in tiddlywiki.info >>> <https://github.com/protw/tw5/blob/master/wiki/tiddlywiki.info>. There >>> you can see section "build" having two subsect

[tw] Re: [TW5] Host on github for free without any git knowledge or software installation

2017-11-20 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Hi Daniel I have been experimenting with my own fork of your tw5-auto-publish2gitlab-pages . I haven't messed around with either GitHub or a continuous

[tw] Re: [TW5] Host on github for free without any git knowledge or software installation

2017-11-20 Thread Daniel Cunningham
Hi Danielo, I have been experimenting with my own fork of your tw5-auto-publish2gitlab-pages . I haven't messed around with either GitHub or a continuous